It was a decision about state constitutionality. They need to go back and rectify a poorly written law.
LOL, what the f are you talking about. All they did was define what a marriage was. The court said it was unfair to do that. It had nothing to do with whether the law was written poorly.
They need to have it in clearly in the constitution that they can do that. That's what the f I'm talking about. They will fix it. But not before you die from hyperventiling about it.
Your idea for a federal constitutional amendment is goofy.
167 posted on 11/18/2003 12:21:08 PM PST by Protagoras
(Hating Democrats doesn't make you a conservative.)