[Belial]

True -It's proven gays have no gay gene. It's not biological.

Interesting! I'd love to see the announcement of this finding. It's pretty difficult to prove a negative. Further, you'd need to be able to trace the source of a complex behavioral pattern to environment and choice.

I think there are two possibilities: you read some propaganda pseudo-science, and believed it outright. Or maybe, you just made all that blather up yourself on the spot.

[Always Right]

Interesting! I'd love to see the announcement of this finding. It's pretty difficult to prove a negative. Further, you'd need to be able to trace the source of a complex behavioral pattern to environment and choice.

On the flip side, the gay agenda relies on their belief that gayness is all genetics. How can anyone deny that environment and choice play a significant role? I would not doubt that there is some genetic influence, but to try to pin gay behavior purely on genetics is a joke. Behavior IS complex and any sciencetist/psychiatrist/doctor who pronounces its all genetics should be removed from their profession.

[richtig_faust]

Interesting! I'd love to see the announcement of this finding. It's pretty difficult to prove a negative
MONOZYGOTIC TWIN STUDIES. It was found that only 51% of the cases where one of the twins was queer that the other one was also. The researchers also admitted that the statistics were probably skewed high because they sought out the people in the studies in such places as san fran. ie: where the atmosphere was pro-queer. If it was genetic the findings would have been closer to 100%