Replies

I do fear.

Look at this whole discussion: Centered on gays. That is exactly how the gay and lesbian activists like it: Here we are, accept us. I AM SORRY BUT THE PROBLEM ARE NOT GAY PEOPLE - THEY ARE FINE. And as the debate drags on, with a gay-friendly media it is oh so easy to change soft minds on these kinds of issue. see, even a church-going lutheran on this thread buys the myth that above-average-income succesful gays face the same 'civil rights' trials as the oppressed blacks of the 1950s and 1960s. minds can be fooled. And as for most conservatives, if its done 'right' and not in our face, no we wont care. In fact, if this was a massachusetts law, I'd have 1/10th the problem with it. Democracy is somewhat self-correcting.

I do have a problem with the destruction of family and marriage, and yet this fight is just a piece of the puzzle.

And yes, Dean is "in bed" with the gay activists (no pun intended), and it can be tied to him, and that may help 'sell' the people on the cultural socialism that the Democrats represents (pro-death anti-family etc) but that's a lesser form of politics that DOESNT SOLVE THE PROBLEM.

THE PROBLEM IS A COURT- CENTERED TYRANNY THAT OVERRULES THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!!!!

Sure we can win a few elections - BUT ARE WE GOING TO SAVE THE COURTS FROM JUDICIAL TYRANNY????

"THE PROBLEM IS A COURT- CENTERED TYRANNY THAT OVERRULES THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE!!!! "

My goodness, you have nailed the issue. At what point do we throw out these robed tyrants. That would sell our culture down the river.