Here you are, on this very thread boldly supporting the gun grabbing AW law:
True conservatives understand there is no chance of electing a more conservative president than Bush and they understand that the AW ban is essentially irrelevent to anything.
Our nation and its liberties existed for almost 150 yrs before "Assault" weapons were even invented. Such things were never even imagined by our founders.
I am an NRA member who believes prohibition of such weapons is not a reason to refuse to back a good man doing his best to preserve our nation in its deadly fight against an enemy as evil as it has ever faced. Those who turn away from him are neither conservatives nor patriots rather they are such as one would not want as an ally because they will cut and run at the least excuse. You are either with the President or doing the work of the RATmedia. The choice is yours.
93 posted on 11/13/2003 2:24 PM PST by justshutupandtakeit
Proof positive, from your own lying lips.
Case closed.
The truth, as usual, lies somewhere in between. justshutupandtakeit is not supporting the AW ban; he is minimizing it's relevance. You're wrong, tpaine, and you are extending what his statements are to encompass a viewpoint that he probably does not hold.
Of course, j.s.u.a.t.i. and I disgree on the point of the relevance of the AW ban, quite strongly. I vehemently appose the continuation of the AW ban, and the significance of it is marginal at the moment -- because it deals mostly in cosmetics (except the 10-rd mag cap) -- but, if reapproved, expect all sorts of new restrictions that are NOT cosmetic.