[Destructor]

You asked what the Constitutional justification was for the War On Drugs, and I told you to the best of my ability based on what I have read. Just because I've read something in order to learn more about it doesn't automatically mean that I agree with any of it. I've read the Communist Manifesto, and I certainly don't agree with any of that business!

I've got to go to work now. Some of us aren't unemployed drug addicts.

[CSM]

You are dancing on both sides of the issue. You say that the constitutional justification for the WOD is the "general welfare" clause. You say you are against the "general welfare" clause. You say you are for the WOD.

You can't be against something, yet support it when convenient for you. That is called hypocrital (note: not an oath doctors take).

"I've got to go to work now. Some of us aren't unemployed drug addicts."

Yep, when logic fails just get on with the ad hominem attacks!