I sized you up for a troll, and you're convincing me I was right. If you'd even bothered to look, you'd have noticed that I've already posted the links -- in THIS thread -- as have others.
But nope. You just want to shoot from the lip, and play your stupid games.
Well guess what? I ain't playing your game.
Bye now.
That is 3 replies to me, and still no answer. A link is hardly an answer to a simple question. Was is a statement she made verbally? A written statement? Her parents interpretation of her wishes? The doctors interpretation of her actions and movements?
Is it really that hard for you to answer the simple question. You said it was known that she wants to live, I merely asked you how you come to that conclusion. This is not a game, I am curious, as that would probably change my mind. I have yet to hear that claim made or substantiated - that she has expressed her wished to live.
I am aware of much of the speculation about her wishes, so you do not need to point me to that.
You are the one playing a game. My thoughts are clear and have been on every Shiavo thread I post to. I would error on the side of the individual rather than on government interference in medical decisions. I see a different slippery slope that others here - I see one where 3rd parties and the government try to make medical decisions for individual on the claim that they are promoting life.
If there is abmibuity, life should always be chosen. But if a clear intention is expressed by an individual, it should not be overidden by the State....regardless of the protestations of well meaning persons.