This old canard is manifestly false. Ron Paul is not willing to let the islamo-horde overrun our borders any more than he is willing to let the Mexican hordes overrun our borders. He just insists that the Congress vote a declaration of war before we engage in one. The reason for this should be obvious. It is to avoid the horrific backstabbing of the troops by the craven politicians of both stripes that we see playing out today. I can see no better example of the wisdom of the founders that Ron Paul speaks for than this.
Not true. Paul maintains that the Iraq war was mistake. Spouting democrat talking points like WMDs, ‘no plan’, etc.
That gives me no confidence in his potential to be commander-in—chief.
Perhaps there wasn’t a declaration of war, but congress did vote their approval. and there hasn’t been formal declarations of war for decades.
So. Since we are already currently engaged, how do you (or Ron Paul) suggest that we rectify this?
I'm up way past my bedtime now, but I look forward to the Kool-Aid inspired entertainment from a few on this thread that is sure to greet me in the morning.
'Night! :-)
This old canard is manifestly false. Ron Paul is not willing to let the islamo-horde overrun our borders any more than he is willing to let the Mexican hordes overrun our borders. He just insists that the Congress vote a declaration of war before we engage in one. The reason for this should be obvious. It is to avoid the horrific backstabbing of the troops by the craven politicians of both stripes that we see playing out today. I can see no better example of the wisdom of the founders that Ron Paul speaks for than this.
That is worth repeating for those who might have missed your post.