“Ron Paul is against illegal immigration. He takes a very strong position on this.”
I understand that Ron Paul is famous for voting against spending on activities that are not expressly authorized by the Constitution. Now I have two questions for you:
What exactly in the Constitution provides any power to the federal government to act against illegal immigration?
How does a staunch defender of the Constitution as Ron Paul justify spending resources on activities not expressly and specifically authorized by the Constitution?
I nominate this comment for the all time stupidest thing ever posted on Free Republic.
or perhaps
To provide for calling forth the Militia to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions.