Liar??! His studies may not have been orthodox, and many are...yet not demonized by the homosexual lobby within the APA, but that doesnt prove his studies (especially ALL of his studies) are wrong does it? His studies are cited by many legitimate organizations and many other accepted studies. If hes a liar then produce a study/studies that DEBUNK any of his studies.
The APA frequently cites Bailey/Pillard, a study discredited by Bailey himself, a study where there was no control group, a study where the sample was solicited volunteers from the gay community. You and the APA are hypocrites to support any study that uses poor methodology, lets throw in the Hooker Study too, and then condemn Cameron for his methodology.
Now what was that study that debunks Cameron again, hmm???
>>>
bigger liar<<<You are a victum of PropaGAYganda: