Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Google “Gag” Order
The Christian Courier ^ | 1-13-03 | by Jared Jackson

Posted on 01/20/2003 5:48:42 PM PST by AdamSelene235

The Google “Gag” Order

by Jared Jackson

Google.com retaliates against the Christian Courier’s “The Progressively Aggressive ‘Gay’ Movement” article. No better example of aggressive behavior could be cited.

Several months ago, we started a teaching campaign using the Google Ad words mechanism. Last week, all of our ads were removed because someone at Google became incensed with our opposition to homosexual conduct.

Google Adwords is an advertising program promoted by the Google search engine enterprise (www.google.com). The Google Adwords program allows a client to target content on its web site directly to a select market. It accomplishes this by allowing the advertiser to purchase key words in their search engine. When the client’s key word is typed into the search engine, thousands of results are returned. But on the right-hand side of the page, a special ad with a link to the customer’s web site, article, or product is displayed.

The advantage of this program is that for a very low cost, you can target the content of your web site very effectively to people who are especially interested in a particular topic.

This past summer we started using Google Adwords to promote various articles on our web site. This strategy was, in our opinion, very successful in driving traffic to our web site. For instance, more than 12,000 people interested in Catholic traditions read our feature article on "Sola Scriptura" and more than 4,100 people, interested in the Left Behind series of books, read our article on Examining Premillennialism.

Our latest attempt at an Adwords campaign was to target those concerned about human cloning. With the recent news of the alleged first human clone being born, we anticipated that many people would be intrigued by this topic. And so, we purchased this ad:

Ethics of Human Cloning Is human cloning ethical? How does one evaluate the ethics of cloning? www.christiancourier.com Interest:

When an ad is submitted, it becomes effective immediately. However, Google will review the ad and subject it to its own moral filter.

Google.com: Promote Sodomy, Yes – Promote Righteousness, No There are a number of reasons why an ad might be disapproved. For instance, certain characters in the title – like the exclamation mark (“!”) – will put a stop to your ad. Google wants their ads to appear attractive. Who can blame them?

Another reason Google will ask to you revise your ad is if there are explicit “calls to action” like “click here!” – although the call to action “chat with hot guys in your area” is acceptable!

A third reason that is certain to get your ad rejected and your account cancelled is to have an article on your web site with the title The Progressively Aggressive “Gay” Movement. That is exactly what happened in our case, last Monday.

Google Puts the “Gag” in “Gag Order” Although we have used the Adwords program successfully during the last year, our recent attempt to promote our article on The Ethics of Human Cloning landed on Theresa’s desk. Theresa is a member of the Google Adwords Team. She wrote the following.

From: adwords-support@google.com Date: Fri, 3 Jan 2003 12:35:12 -0800 Subject: Your Google AdWords Approval Status

Hello Jared,

Thank you for advertising with Google AdWords. Our goal is to help you create high-impact advertising that reaches your target audience and maximizes your investment.

After reviewing your account, I have found that one or more of your ads or keywords does not meet our guidelines. These results are outlined in the report below.

In order to ensure your ad's success and relevance, our AdWords Specialists review each ad and keyword for compliance with our Editorial Guidelines.

We disable keywords and temporarily suspend ads that don't meet our guidelines.

If a keyword has been disabled, your ad(s) will no longer be displayed for searches on this keyword. If an ad has been suspended, please edit it based on our suggestions below. Save your changes to automatically resubmit it for review. To log in to your account, please go to: https://adwords.google.com/select/

---------------------------------------------- Campaign: 'Campaign #9,' Ad Group: 'Ad Group #1' ----------------------------------------------

AD TEXT:

Ethics of Human Cloning Is human cloning ethical? How does one evaluate the ethics of cloning? www.christiancourier.com

Action taken: Suspended - Pending Revision Issue(s): Unacceptable Content ~~~~~~~~~

SUGGESTIONS: -> Content: At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain "language that advocates against an individual, group, or organization." As noted in our advertising terms and conditions, we reserve the right to exercise editorial discretion when it comes to the advertising we accept on our site.

--------------------- Read below for definitions of the issues we discovered:

Unacceptable Content: Google believes strongly in freedom of expression and therefore offers broad access to content across the web without censoring search results. Please note that the decisions we make concerning advertising in no way affect the search results we deliver.

--------------------- We're confident these changes will improve the performance of your ads and increase the return on your investment. For more information on performance tips and ad requirements, please see:

Optimize your ads: https://adwords.google.com/select/tips.html

The AdWords Editorial Guidelines: https://adwords.google.com/select/guidelines.html

Please feel free to email us at adwords-support@google.com if you have any further questions or concerns.

Sincerely,

The Google AdWords Team

As noted in this letter, the reason cited for the removal of our ads on cloning, was that our web site contained “Unacceptable content.”

I was puzzled. Surely this was a mistake. What “Unacceptable content” could they be talking about?

I wrote the following note.

“Please clarify as to why the following ad was rejected.”

More boilerplate was forthcoming. Then, this was added:

“At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain ‘anti-homosexual content.’ As noted in our advertising terms and conditions, we reserve the right to exercise editorial discretion when it comes to the advertising we accept on our site.”

Now the pieces of the puzzle were coming together.

In our article on cloning, a link to another article The Progressively Aggressive “Gay” Movement appeared on the right-hand side of the page in the “Related Articles” section. The two articles were “related” in our system because the both dealt with issues of morality.

Seeing this had hit a sore spot, I altered the links on the right-hand side and resubmitted the ad. After all, it was recommended that “these changes will improve the performance....”

Last Monday, I received this response.

Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 07:26:38 -0800 From: "AdWords Support" Subject: Re: AdWords user feedback: Please clarify [#1431874]

Hi Jared,

Thank you for your reply.

As my previous message stated, "As noted in our advertising terms and conditions, we reserve the right to exercise editorial discretion when it comes to the advertising we accept on our site."

And, as to why your ads have been disapproved, the following statement was taken from your webiste [sic]:

"At the same time, though, we must uncompromisingly affirm: This will not pass! Homosexuality is a moral evil, and we will oppose this sin without yielding any ground."

We value your right to your opinions however, if they are against an individual, group or organization, we do not allow them to be advertised on Google.

Sincerely,

Theresa Google AdWords Team

This policy, of course, means that Google refuses to accept advertising from those who are against anything – although, they certainly are selective in how they apply their self-made moral standard. (In fact, in a recent lawsuit, they vehemently defend their own content as “commerical free speech” having first amendment protection. However, according to this policy, their clients must relinquish theirs.)

And so, all of our ads – on baptism, premillennialism, restoration, etc. – have been cancelled.

If you want to get an idea of what kind of content Google finds acceptable, just type in the words “gay,” “sex,” “homosexual,” or some similar combination (although we really can’t recommend it). You will see what a great variety of absolutely filthy, degrading ads Google does accept and from which they make their living.

So the lesson learned is this: you can promote debauchery on Google, but not righteousness. You can extol the “virtues” of sodomy, but not godliness. You can speak against purity, but not against sinfulness. Such a distorted view of ethics boggles the mind.

Our response What are we to do? We don’t have the time or interest in mounting a campaign against Google. I did, however, send a reply.

To: "AdWords Support" Subject: Re: Fwd: Re: AdWords user feedback

Thank you for clarifying. I'm sure that in your editorial discretion, you feel that you have done the right thing in removing all of our ads in accordance with your personal feelings about the issue of homosexuality. However, I note with some interest that we have used Google services for months now and this is the first time this issue has surfaced.

Be that as it may, your personal interest in aggressively exercising editorial control of this unpublished policy is a perfect example of "The Progressively Aggressive “Gay” Movement," the article you find so offensive. You obviously have used your position to make your personal statement in regards to our content. So much for tolerance.

Sincerely,

Jared Jackson

Anger is a natural response. However, short of sending Theresa a note of complaint (click here to send her a note), there is little else to do.

We could remove our articles that address homosexuality. Such a compromise would be practical in the judgment of some. But we would rather suffer this injustice than withhold the whole council of God. We must obey God rather than be intimidated by evil men.

“If the world hateth you, ye know that it hath hated me before it hated you. If ye were of the world, the world would love its own: but because ye are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the world hateth you. Remember the word that I said unto you, A servant is not greater than his lord. If they persecuted me, they will also persecute you; if they kept my word, they will keep yours also. But all these things will they do unto you for my name’s sake, because they know not him that sent me” (John 15:18-21).


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News
KEYWORDS: adwords; censorship; christianlist; christianpersecutio; freedomofreligion; freep; google; homosexualagenda; mediabias; polcorrectness; politicallycorrect; prisoners; religion; searchengines; sexads; sexadvertisements; sodomy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last
To: uncowed
Try teoma.com. When I do a search on temoa, it generally comes up with the same things that google does. It does not have the "cached" pages, like google however. This is too bad because the "cached" pages gives you access to something that may no longer be posted, like a newspaper article.
41 posted on 01/20/2003 8:58:37 PM PST by eeman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Born in a Rage
Google is not the government and they can 'censor' any ads they don't want.

And I can quit using its search engine.

Done.

42 posted on 01/20/2003 9:02:15 PM PST by Kevin Curry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Born in a Rage
"Google is not the government and they can 'censor' any ads they don't want. Get over it and/or start your own search engine. There is no 1st Amendment issue here."

You are absolutely correct but the problem lies in the fact that the MEDIA will ALWAYS use situations such as this to forward the LIBERAL agenda. Google will not be presented as a private business that is using its legal powers of choosing advertisers, but as a champion of the fight AGAINST christianity.
Just look at how the MEDIA has chastised Augusta National for doing WHAT IT HAS THE LEGAL AUTHORITY TO DO!

It is not a question of first ammendment rights but how the MEDIA chooses to present the story!

43 posted on 01/20/2003 9:52:01 PM PST by 100%FEDUP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
I'm curious why you say that this "bigotry (towards Christians)is apt description of Google's behavior," apparently based on the single thread above. I presume you have evidence of many other similar events? I have had a large Christian website up and running for about 1-1/2 years, for which i thank Google for probably 70% of the hits i have received (it's quite a busy site), and in which some of the pages have been listed in the top ten from time to time. I don't happen to have any content in the site that condemns or even remotely implies condemnation of anyone, which may account for their quite positive treatment of my site. It also is clearly PRO-America...and highly supportive of our American military.

So, maybe the 'key' to success with Google (besides great meta-tagging ;-) is that you promote your ideas without dragging down other people? Just a thought.
44 posted on 01/20/2003 9:53:39 PM PST by DontMessWithMyCountry (It's serious business being an American in America these days.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Pushi
Well, they hired her.

And, presumably, trained her, both of which are irrelevant. Not only do underlings make mistakes, but so do bosses, who can be persuaded to reverse a standing policy. But this fellow will never know, because he didn't bother to ask. He was too busy complaining....

45 posted on 01/20/2003 10:02:38 PM PST by Hebrews 11:6 (Look it up!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Kevin Curry
Dito here. Just deleted Google from the favorites list. I read the Wired article; the Goofle owner/guy on the moral steering wheel over there listens to NPR in the car and he is apparently a Democrat/Independent airhead. Enough said. Thank you for that Wired link. As usual Freepers are the best.

So here's the answer according to Wired:

ALLTHEWEB.COM

I tried it and ALLTHEWEB is streamlined like Goofle, has 14 day update crawls, and is as fast as Goofle too. Ta Da.

46 posted on 01/20/2003 10:45:03 PM PST by rocknotsand (Use it or lose it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
You people are silly. Google didn't treat this advertiser any differently than all their others (I've had several ads pulled from Google for various reason). But somehow, when they treat The Christian Courier the same as everyone else, it's bigotry and worthy of a boycott! Too funny and, unfortunately, too typical.
47 posted on 01/21/2003 4:58:32 AM PST by Your Nightmare
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bribriagain
"usual arrogance of the Saved."

Thank you. We needed input from the damned. Take a bow.

I rest my case.

48 posted on 01/21/2003 5:16:34 AM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
“At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain ‘anti-homosexual content.’

OK, I'm pissed.

49 posted on 01/21/2003 5:21:05 AM PST by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
I read some place lately that google's French and German affiliates, google.fr and google.de, are going to stop linking their search engines to what they consider hate sites.
50 posted on 01/21/2003 5:24:13 AM PST by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Aquinasfan
“At this time, Google policy does not permit the advertisement of websites that contain ‘anti-homosexual content.

Do they, then, accept "pro-gay" content? Seems they have established that they are not (despite the claims of some here), morally neutral on certain issues.

Google is like unto CBCABCCNNNBCMSNBC or others that present leftist litanies without opposition. Obviously, some accept that as a given and good.

51 posted on 01/21/2003 5:32:32 AM PST by twntaipan (Political Correctness: The "Cultural Revolution" of the Left--with equally devastating results!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: Kuleana
Gay people suck.

Gay people can put it where the sun don't shine.

52 posted on 01/21/2003 5:45:16 AM PST by copycat (Arbeit macht frei.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: rocknotsand
NPR? My homepage is now switched from Google to AlltheWeb.com. Thanks for the info.
53 posted on 01/21/2003 5:47:50 AM PST by copycat (Arbeit macht frei.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AdamSelene235
Every few months I need to repeat what I have been saying for about 15 years now:

Political diversity, Multiculturalism and ersatz "tolerance" will be the death of our society.

54 posted on 01/21/2003 5:50:12 AM PST by Publius6961
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


God Bless This Great Country!


Donate Here By Secure Server

Or mail checks to
FreeRepublic , LLC
PO BOX 9771
FRESNO, CA 93794

or you can use

PayPal at Jimrob@psnw.com

STOP BY AND BUMP THE FUNDRAISER THREAD-
It is in the breaking news sidebar!


55 posted on 01/21/2003 5:55:23 AM PST by Mo1 (Support Free Republic and become a Monthly Donor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: RonDog
murders should have been murderers

Well, you can't have one without the other.
56 posted on 01/21/2003 6:04:04 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Grut; Born in a Rage; AdamSelene235
Google is a private business and can list or not list copy as it chooses. The Christian Courier has no claim on them except the usual arrogance of the Saved.

You're swallowing the camel to strain at your own personal gnats (..."usual arrogance of the Saved"). If A says he has a policy that won't permit B to do C and yet does C himself, then he should be held to account for his hypocrisy, especially if he is offering a service to the public that is based on the prohibition. At the minimum, his own personal preferences aside, he is engaging in false advertising.
57 posted on 01/21/2003 6:12:58 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: rocknotsand
I just tried alltheweb - pretty nice; in fact I found this picture of Hillary entering her walk-in closet to gather up Old Crusty:


58 posted on 01/21/2003 6:23:43 AM PST by ErnBatavia ((Bumperootus!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Grut
"I rest my case."

You never made one. You don't even know what religion I am.

59 posted on 01/21/2003 8:05:35 AM PST by bribriagain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: aruanan
...then he should be held to account for his hypocrisy...

Well, he (Google) is free to be a hypocrite and others are free to call him on it, but when the others expect him to change his ways because they've called him on it, that's "the usual arrogance of the Saved" all over.

60 posted on 01/21/2003 1:12:13 PM PST by Grut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson