1 posted on
12/18/2002 11:00:51 AM PST by
zingzang
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
To: Notwithstanding; Salvation
ping
2 posted on
12/18/2002 11:02:08 AM PST by
Desdemona
To: zingzang; scripter; Clint N. Suhks
Bump & Ping
3 posted on
12/18/2002 11:02:56 AM PST by
EdReform
To: zingzang
I couldn't help laughing. He compared the Catholic Church to a gay bar!
To: zingzang
"...the evidence indicates that disproportionate numbers of gay men seek adolescent males or boys as sexual partners."Of course, the homosexuals and the pro-homo cheerleaders will attempt to deny this by pointing out that most pedophiles are heterosexual (although no heterosexual would be interested in a boy - only homosexuals). Considering that heteros are 98% of the population but homosexuals are 30% of the pedophiles, it's a nonsensical defense.
6 posted on
12/18/2002 11:09:01 AM PST by
FormerLib
To: *Homosexual Agenda; Khepera; ppaul; buffyt; L.N. Smithee; conserve-it; g'nad; Clint N. Suhks; ...
Let me know if you want to be included or removed in future pings of this type.
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Homosexual Agenda, click below: |
|
click here >>> |
Homosexual Agenda |
<<< click here |
|
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
12 posted on
12/18/2002 11:13:27 AM PST by
scripter
To: zingzang
13 posted on
12/18/2002 11:14:57 AM PST by
Remedy
To: zingzang
14 posted on
12/18/2002 11:15:47 AM PST by
EdReform
To: zingzang
Queers and pedophiles are two different species.
I regard the former as confused... the latter as scum in need of a bullet.
Homo priests don't bother me. They are passive clerics and God will judge them.
It's the ones that prey on on kids... pedophiles, that are the danger.
Like Michael Jackson and Paula Poundstone, these people are dimented and sick. And they are incurable!
22 posted on
12/18/2002 11:25:51 AM PST by
johnny7
To: zingzang
It's quite obvious from the Catholic Church homosexual abuse scandal that homosexual men are much more likely to molest teenage boys than heterosexual men teenage girls. The Catholic Church must decide - normal priests who parents can trust with their sons - or a disordered homo priesthood where your sons are in danger with a priest. Parents are fed up and the vast, vast majority of them will NEVER allow their sons to be alone with a priest again.
To: zingzang
NAM&LA, has been a proud member of the so-called "gay rights" movement, Actually, the so-called "gay rights" movement would love to rid itself of the association with the above mentioned group. They certainly are not welcomed.
To: zingzang
He presented a retired priest and psychotherapist named Richard Sipe, who estimated that 30 percent of Catholic priests are gay. Thats a high number. But Sipe didnt want them kicked out. In fact, he told Pitts that a ban on homosexuals in the priesthood would be "like a gay bar refusing to serve homosexual patrons. It doesnt make any sense." This has got to be one of the strangest analogies ever offered in defense of homosexuals as priests. His rationale is that since gay bars serve gays, the church should keep its homosexual priests. But the church is not supposed to be an arm of the homosexual movement. |
Courage, an apostolate of the Roman Catholic Church, ministers to those with same-sex attractions and their loved ones. We have been endorsed by the Pontifical Council for the Family.
52 posted on
12/18/2002 12:01:12 PM PST by
Remedy
To: zingzang
The important concept here is "celibate".
Active homosexuals in the church are the same as married men lying their way into the priesthood. It's the lie, the cover-up.
It's the moral equivalent of robbers being able to keep the money they steal or illegal immigrant becoming citizens while immigrants who following the rules can't become citizens. It's cheating.
It's the "clinton way" -- the cheat, the lie. To opposite of spiritual.
Catholics can change the celibate standing of their priest. But celibate for heterosexuals and not for homosexuals? Too bizarre.
77 posted on
12/18/2002 12:31:39 PM PST by
GOPJ
To: zingzang
Homosexual Priests: A Time for Truth
"... The homosexual movement has a history of trying to claw its way into places its agenda doesnt belong, not for the betterment of mankind, but simply to legitimize and normalize perverse behavior. This is apparent in the all-too-common need of homosexuals to declare their sexuality rather than simply do the job they sign on to do.
This is extremely detrimentalfirst, it creates conflict with others as most believe homosexuality to be wrong, and it shows that the full efforts of the employed homosexual are not going towards performing the task at hand but largely to declaring their lifestyle. When it comes to serious concerns such as the Church, schools, and the Boy Scouts that involve our children, we cant take the risk of giving them this power to destroy the values we as parents try to instill, nor can we put our countrys welfare at stake by turning these pivotal foundational institutions and our military into homosexual social experiments.
The homosexual movement is marked by two major tendencies: the tendency to continually infiltrate all good aspects of society; and once they have achieved that, the tendency to destroy this good. Public education, the Boy Scouts, the military, and now the Catholic Church have been targeted, and all have been hurt by the effects of homosexuality. The media and the Church must break its silence towards this enemy. If they do not, the people themselves must rise up and expose it..."
78 posted on
12/18/2002 12:34:21 PM PST by
EdReform
To: zingzang
For future reference -- this is an unsigned editorial from the publishers of a leading gay newspaper in San Francisco, in response to a letter from a gay person condemning the participation of NAMBLA in the upcoming Gay Freedom Day parade:
"The love between men and boys is at the foundation of homosexuality. For the gay community to imply that boy-love is not homosexual love is ridiculous. We must not be seduced into believing misinformation from the press and the government. Child molesting does occur, but there are also positive sexual relations. And we need to support the men and the boys in those relationships." "Point of View: No Place for Homo-Homophobia." San Francisco Sentinel, March 26, 1992.
To: zingzang
Suggested investigation: Someone with too much time on their hands should do a statistical analysis of the differing way homosexual pedophilia is reported as opposed to hetero-pedophilia. Whenever a male is molesting a female, the sex of the child seems to be prominently stated. When its homo-pedophilia, it looks to me like the press tends to bury any reference to the sex of the victim.
Given the comparable rates, how much MORE vulnerable are our sons, than our daughters? I'll bet the number is huge.
To: zingzang
Funny how the rest of the world is mute on this subject. Could'nt be solely an American problem.
Maybe it is...DuuuUH...
To: zingzang
The media has it's lights focused on the controversy surrounding the pedophile activities of homosexual priests within the church. So why isn't anyone talking about the the women who obviously knew about those priest's behavior and did nothing? Is it possible for homosexual females to belong to the church as well as males? If the church is infested with homosexuals do they all have to be men?
Doesn't it seem reasonable to assume that if there are male homosexual priests sexually active within the church that there are probably female homosexual nuns, and lay women, that are active too?
To my knowledge, this question has never been brought up. Why not?
I understand that the statistics of female pedophiles are much lower than male pedophiles, but if there are sexually active homosexual nuns and/or laywomen could they not be engaged in activities that have yet to be brought to light?
With all the information now coming to light about the priests sexual activities one has to ask how nuns, and other women working in the church, knew nothing of what was going on? The priests have been abusing children for years, and the women those priests work with on a daily basis are never asked what they knew or how they may have played a role in those activities.
I think it's a question worth asking of those investigating the church scandals.
To: zingzang
Conclusion: If Homos were called Queeers instead of Gays
then more kids would be running away rather than trying to hang around and be happy!......
167 posted on
12/19/2002 5:21:13 PM PST by
TRY ONE
To: zingzang
bump for later read.
184 posted on
12/27/2002 8:59:35 AM PST by
jjm2111
To: zingzang
"The Vatican is now drafting a document that could ban homosexuals from the priest hood." Its about time.
185 posted on
12/27/2002 9:03:54 AM PST by
Mikey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson