Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: robertpaulsen
Not at all; I see it as a rather thick line. Tobacco is a legal product. And the "privacy of their own home" does not protect an individual from legal action.

Yet, you think that restaurants should have the right to decide if they want people smoking in their restaurants or not, and that people should have the right to smoke or not. Yet you think that people shouldn't have any right to smoke pot at all. That's the thin line I'm talking about...
96 posted on 08/09/2002 7:54:16 AM PDT by WyldKard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]


To: WyldKard
You think there's a thin line between smoking cigarettes and smoking pot? What, just because they contain the word "smoking"?

Well, I see a difference. Do you see a "thin line" between smoking cigarettes and smoking crack? Or smoking pot with PCP? Smoking pot with formaldehyde? Laced with heroin? Laced with cocaine?

If it's illegal, I don't care whether it's smoked, snorted, or injected. There is no thin line.

103 posted on 08/09/2002 8:14:22 AM PDT by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

To: WyldKard
Yet you think that people shouldn't have any right to smoke pot at all. That's the thin line I'm talking about...

Oh geeesh........Ask BLOOMBERG about HIS pot smoking experience! LOL


107 posted on 08/09/2002 8:26:34 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson