Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Dr. James Dobson Criticizes Bush Appointment to the CDC
US Newswire ^ | 7/2/02

Posted on 07/04/2002 8:45:17 AM PDT by truthandlife

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last
To: lone star annie
I have heard this guy try to blackmail Newt Gingrich and the GOP. I don't care for him at all. He is devisive and negative and just the type that drives people out of the party.

Blackmail is a crime. If you have evidence of a criminal act then you should report it to the proper authorities.

21 posted on 07/04/2002 9:37:24 AM PDT by Sci Fi Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

Comment #22 Removed by Moderator

To: mombonn
>>She may well have been SILENT during the clintbilly years in order to protect herself<<

Julie Gerberding started as an AIDS doc in SF in the bad old days. I suspect she has left-wing sympathies.

But I don't know, and the reason I don't know is that she's a doctor, not a politician. I am appalled that Dobson would bash Bush and oppose a highly qualified nominee over what he thinks her politics may be.

23 posted on 07/04/2002 9:58:09 AM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
I am appalled that Dobson would bash Bush and oppose a highly qualified nominee over what he thinks her politics may be.

the most reasonable comment on this thread.

24 posted on 07/04/2002 10:05:53 AM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
BUMP
25 posted on 07/04/2002 10:33:22 AM PDT by Conservative Chicagoan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Registered
So it doesn't bother you one bit that he's right? Of course not, as a Bush apologist, Bush can do no wrong.
26 posted on 07/04/2002 10:44:21 AM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Registered
sorry.. you gotta let us know when you're being sarcastic hon.
27 posted on 07/04/2002 10:46:12 AM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Dobson 100% represents my view!
28 posted on 07/04/2002 11:04:59 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: mombonn
Last time I checked this is still a free country and Dobson is entitled to his views. He speaks for me anyway, so I appreciated what he had to say.

If anyone wants to look at the big picture, Dobson has been (and I am sure will be) a big support of President Bush. It is important that he speak up when he thinks Bush made a bad decision. He represents millions of people like me who want the President to hear our disappointment. That's the way our free society works.

29 posted on 07/04/2002 11:09:43 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Registered
Dobson, like many conservatives here, is probably suffering from the culmination of one after another Bush appointee and social spending let-downs.

Do I want someone to head the CDC that is an expert on communicable diseases and knows how to manage the scientific organization OR do I want someone whose chief qualifications are they are anti-gay, anti-sex education and a Christian? That's an easy choice for most people. Why is it so hard for Dobson to figure out?

30 posted on 07/04/2002 11:11:51 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
um, what good is it to have a two party system if when your party is "in" you can't pick your appointments according to their political views? That's silly and crazy. I assure you Clinton picked each and every person for their outrageous political views.
31 posted on 07/04/2002 11:12:14 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Registered
I'm talking about being a Conservative and implementing the Conservative agenda.

Now exactly what does "the" conservative agenda entail? Frankly Dobson doesnt represent the conservative agenda for most conservatives.

32 posted on 07/04/2002 11:15:58 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I assure you Clinton picked each and every person for their outrageous political views.

Well that's just a terrific example to follow.

what good is it to have a two party system if when your party is "in" you can't pick your appointments according to their political views?

I have been critical of Bush on many occasions and consider him to be, other than 9/11 and related matters a mediocre President so far. Political considerations in appointments are reasonable, but the head of the CDC or other scientific agencies should be chosen on their qualifications in the field, not their politics, IMO.

No, I don't think we all wanna be like Clinton&co.

33 posted on 07/04/2002 11:21:39 AM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I assure you Clinton picked each and every person for their outrageous political views.

I bet you're wrong. Clinton could probably have cared less what their views were. He just wanted the power and the fun of being the Head of State and Top Dog. His leftwing flunkies made the appointments and Clinton signed off on them. Clinton didnt care about a liberal agenda, he didnt care about the country, he just cared about ... Clinton.

34 posted on 07/04/2002 11:21:58 AM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
Dobson said: The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is already the world's largest promoter of homosexuality and 'safe-sex' programs, and now the president has appointed someone whose positions indicate that the organization will continue dishing out more of the same.

I just think, in this particular appointment, her politics will effect procedure and therefore matter. Especially to someone like Dobson (who speaks for people like me). If he doesn't like it he has the freedom to say so. The idea that all Republican's should walk in lockstep whether they agree with a decision or not is appalling to me. Dobson compliments Bush all the time and attacking him for his differences will not aid Bush in the least.

35 posted on 07/04/2002 11:30:11 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
I think Dobson is wrong and I think Bush is wrong. Not about this appointee - I don't know anything about her.

The "Centers for Disease Control and Prevention" needs to be dismantled and started over from scratch.

The CDC is as bad as WHO.

36 posted on 07/04/2002 11:32:26 AM PDT by Gabz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dave S
His leftwing flunkies made the appointments and Clinton signed off on them.

Dave, Sick Willie's appointments were either proposed or vetted by Her Royal Heinous, Hitlery Rotten Clitoon.

I'm serious, he didn't make any appointments without her OK. The flunkies weren't suggesting appointments; they just trembled in their boots when she was around.

37 posted on 07/04/2002 11:40:21 AM PDT by Ole Okie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: RJCogburn
. Dobson compliments Bush all the time and attacking him for his differences will not aid Bush in the least. Correction of nonsense sentence (sorry, my fingers go faster than my brain sometimes)

Dobson compliments Bush all the time. He likes Bush for the most part. But Dobson has the right to point out where he differs with Bush. Dobson's voice represents my voice and so I am very appreciative. Conservatives may not always agree on everything and it is important to remember the big picture. At the same time we should not require lockstep following of leadership at the expense of our own consciences.

Hopefully that's clearer.

38 posted on 07/04/2002 11:52:39 AM PDT by RAT Patrol
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
The idea that all Republican's should walk in lockstep whether they agree with a decision or not is appalling to me.

And me.

39 posted on 07/04/2002 12:42:03 PM PDT by RJCogburn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Ole Okie
Dave, Sick Willie's appointments were either proposed or vetted by Her Royal Heinous, Hitlery Rotten Clitoon. I'm serious, he didn't make any appointments without her OK. The flunkies weren't suggesting appointments; they just trembled in their boots when she was around

You're probably right. I would be trembling with that Hillary witch looking over my shoulder. My point though was I dont think Bill Clinton, himself, could have cared less who was in those slots. Now his wife is a different animal. She is an an extreme partisan Liberal.

40 posted on 07/04/2002 1:49:02 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-65 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson