[Texasforever]

LOL! Sure CO2 emissions have increased since the Industrial Revolution.

However, Bush has only conceded that point and rightly so because it is NOT debatable. Co2 is only ONE of hundreds of "greenhouse gases". Just because the NYT and other media outlets including WND have spun this to mean that Bush has conceded that GLOBAL WARMING is man made is a gross inaccuracy and frankly agenda driven. It drives me up a dammed wall when people jump to conclusions based on false premises. This article along with the NYT "analysis" has done just that. Bush has NEVER once stated that GLOBAL WARMING is a man made phenomena.

[goldstategop]

Well I'd like to hear him correct Ari Fleischer. I will be satisfied once he says his press secretary got it wrong, no we're not backing that report and we'll have nothing to do with the statist agenda in that report, period. Until then its a bone of contention on my part cause I don't think we'll like where I fear we may wind up. That's why I'm calling this on the President.

[ChasingFletch]

"Bush has NEVER once stated that GLOBAL WARMING is a man made phenomena."

And I hope he never does. If and when he does I hope he includes one other "certainty". V.F. drove his own car to the Park that warm day! (sarcasm warning)

[Sam Cree]

One thing is for sure, everyone is confused on Bush's stance on this issue, whether they should be or not. It's discouraging, but I doubt it will become clearer. If Bush wants to hedge issues to get what he needs to fight terror, I understand, I just don't think people will vote for a second rate "democrat" when there are real ones (unfortunately) handy.

I don't see that science has any clear conclusion on what man's effect is on global warming; a meteorologist I spoke with indicates that sunspot activity may well be the main player. My belief is that the computer models used are seriously flawed.

When scientists can figure out tomorrow's weather for one city, maybe then they can have a shot at the whole planet for decades at a time.