Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AlGone2001
"I can't wait for you to tell us all what the "political objective" is (concerning the USGC). Do tell. Be extremely and painfully specific. I am waiting."

I do not know what your after, but if you can't see the politics in this latest directive, then your lost. Placing the USCG under another newly appointed political agency is a slap at every coastie who ever served. This newest move was surely to upstage the US Senate. Just like the appointment of Ridge was. 170,000 folk is what? Streamlining?

Let me be simple to you. Its the USCG who should be leading the Homeland Defense of the United States. Not some political jerk. Get it!?

446 posted on 06/06/2002 9:10:55 PM PDT by PoppingSmoke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 431 | View Replies ]


To: PoppingSmoke
Let me be simple to you. Its the USCG who should be leading the Homeland Defense of the United States. Not some political jerk.

You are proposing a military dictatorship to solve the problem. How interesting. Wonder why the globalist advisors to Bush didn't think of that.

454 posted on 06/06/2002 9:15:21 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies ]

To: PoppingSmoke
I do not know what your after, but if you can't see the politics in this latest directive, then your lost.

That was all I expected you to provide. Thanks any way.

My cousin is in the Coast Guard. I have great respect for the people.

The US Army is still mad that the Army Air Forces were separated from them in 1947 as the US Air Force.

Reorganization worked there, didn't it?

457 posted on 06/06/2002 9:17:50 PM PDT by AlGone2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 446 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson