Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

BUSH PROPOSES LARGEST EXPANSION OF GOVERNMENT SINCE TRUMAN
CNN ^ | 6/6/2002 | President

Posted on 06/06/2002 5:17:43 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye

I am watching President Bush giving a speech on CNN telling us he is expanding federal government more than any Democrat since Truman.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bush; defense; expansion; homeland
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541-550 next last
To: Lower55
How do you spell cockamaime? sp?

Libertarian.

161 posted on 06/06/2002 6:34:37 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 142 | View Replies]

To: Lower55
You trying to bust up our party?

LOL! Sorry to be such a downer;)

162 posted on 06/06/2002 6:34:49 PM PDT by Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 155 | View Replies]

To: lawdog
Combining a law enforcement function with intelligence services is risky business and is fraught with the potential to supress the very liberty it seeks to protect.

Right.
What we really want is law enforcement with no intelligence at all.
It could be dangerous for them to actually know who to go after.

163 posted on 06/06/2002 6:35:07 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 149 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Why is that relevant. I miss your point.

You all are lauding and applauding this new Cabinet post and all that goes along with it, comments posted read as though this is a temporary fix, needed because of this emergency situation, gee, when it's all over and we've won, it won't exist any more.

Nothing lives longer than a government program, this position is PERMANENT. Any government program receives more and more tax dollars every budget cycle. There is no way in he** this cannot be called an expansion of government ... it simply needs the preposition "now" added to the phrase.

And you can bet your life that the next Dem who becomes president and appoints one of his buddies to the post is going to make his *turf* as big as he possibly can. That's my point.

164 posted on 06/06/2002 6:35:10 PM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 124 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Lol...you got it. never thought of that spelling.
165 posted on 06/06/2002 6:35:26 PM PDT by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 161 | View Replies]

To: Pete
Excellent information but it won't mean swill to some here. Thanks for the information.
166 posted on 06/06/2002 6:35:28 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Your attempt to educate is commendable but it will fall on deaf ears. The Bush Bashers on here are not interested in facts, they are only interested in bashing the President.
167 posted on 06/06/2002 6:36:12 PM PDT by Kath
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
No that's not what I said. Do have any experience in either ?
168 posted on 06/06/2002 6:36:44 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
No look, these are the agencies from those departments that are going into Homeland:

--Agriculture Department: Secretary Ann Veneman's agency will lose the Plant Health Inspection Service and the Plum Island Animal Disease Center.

--Commerce Department: Secretary Donald Evans' agency will lose the Critical Infrastructure Assurance Office.

Of course this stuff is typical of the government. Why did the Secret Service wind up under Treasury? Oh I'm sure somebody had a compelling arguement at the time (probably the guy in charge of the department) but it doesn't take long for these things to stop making sense.

I think people are actually mad because this is going to totally screw up their trivial pursuit game. What department is this agency in is a fun game to play with our government. Now there's going to be a bunch that actually make sense. And people are miffed.

169 posted on 06/06/2002 6:37:21 PM PDT by discostu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
You are kidding, right ?

Actually, Ag (and the FDA) oversee the security of the nation's food supply.
170 posted on 06/06/2002 6:37:23 PM PDT by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 158 | View Replies]

To: MississippiDeltaDawg
Would Nadler be considered an expansion in government?

Would defeating him be a reduction?

171 posted on 06/06/2002 6:37:26 PM PDT by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: UnBlinkingEye
Now I am going to refrain from calling you a liar or stupid BUT it is a re-organization,. Yes it is the most extensive re-organization,/B> since the creation of the defense department but IT IS NOT AN EXPANSION and your post should be deleted in the interests of accuracy.
172 posted on 06/06/2002 6:38:03 PM PDT by Texasforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: discostu
Outside of our borders. It's a CIA vs FBI thing.

I'm not clear on the responsiblities now, but in the past the CIA was only to investigate outside the U.S. and the FBI was used for domestic intelligence.

DOD runs the military who's job is to invade other countries and defend our from invasion. Terrorists don't do that invasion stuff, it's not their style.

The ultimate responsibility of the DOD and federal government is to protect the citizens and prevent and defeat foreign attack.

Bush didn't pick this fight, but it is his job, as specifically outlined in the constitution, to win it. If you've got better ideas pony up. But all I see is whining.

I suggest we abandon our role as globocop, mind our own borders and keep our nose out of other nations business.

173 posted on 06/06/2002 6:38:11 PM PDT by UnBlinkingEye
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 153 | View Replies]

To: Jorge
Excuse me," Do you have .."
174 posted on 06/06/2002 6:38:13 PM PDT by lawdog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 163 | View Replies]

To: MississippiDeltaDawg
And you can bet your life that the next Dem who becomes president and appoints one of his buddies to the post is going to make his *turf* as big as he possibly can. That's my point.,

So your premise is that we would have less spending proposed by a tax and spend liberal without this department ? Your still kidding aren't you ?

175 posted on 06/06/2002 6:39:00 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: sinkspur
He's probably got 'em all memorized or can get 'em from some guy sittin' in his underwear on the short wave.

As a matter of fact, I read the list right here at FR, a Bush supporter who wanted everyone to know just what had been going on, what Clinton had added, and what Bush was going to fix, FWIW. Wish I'd had the foresight to save the thread ... but I didn't think y'all would turn into a bunch of Carville-sound-alikes.

176 posted on 06/06/2002 6:39:32 PM PDT by MozarkDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 139 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
Then don't vote for a democrat.
177 posted on 06/06/2002 6:40:32 PM PDT by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: VRWC_minion
also:

Creating new agency--stripping away good personnel, authority, and funding from large ineffective bureaucracies (for example--taking cargo inspection dollars and responsibility away from the Dept. of Transportation and moving it over to Homeland Security)--equals good business sense.

GW is doing a classic deal--a merger of sorts--reallocating personnel and assets so that they can be used more effectively--structuring a new chain of command to facillitate decision making (Tom Ridge said it took 4 months to get some troops on our Canadian border because so may steps/ agencies were involved.)--bringing together all the relevant threads necessary to develop an efficient reactive capability--it is a brilliant business proposal presented at exactly the right time--the Democrats can hardly refuse to relinquish some of their power over agency departments after squealing so long and hard about the need for GW to create a cabinet position...he is the fox...Karl Rove, Karen Hughes, and even Tom Ridge have earned my admiration tonight.

178 posted on 06/06/2002 6:40:54 PM PDT by foreshadowed at waco
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: discostu
What department is this agency in is a fun game to play with our government.

I see. By taking irrelevant departments and their existing budgets and giving them a new mission, Bush has co-opted their budgets and related pork to use to further the security of our country. Now I get it.

179 posted on 06/06/2002 6:42:05 PM PDT by VRWC_minion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: foreshadowed at waco
And Laurie Dhue is a good-looking sum-bit.
180 posted on 06/06/2002 6:42:41 PM PDT by Lower55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200 ... 541-550 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson