Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush's Record Calls into Question His Conservative Label
The American Partisan ^ | June 5, 2002 | David T. Pyne

Posted on 06/05/2002 8:47:43 AM PDT by rightwing2

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-278 next last
To: rightwing2
He lost me over his policy (or non-policy) on illegal immigration.

As far as I'm concerned unless he aggressively addresses the illegal immigration problem to my satisfaction before '04 he's lost my vote.

61 posted on 06/05/2002 10:27:04 AM PDT by Bikers4Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
Don't blame me I voted for the Conservative candidate.
============

 

alt
A Conservative Agenda
for a New Century

by Patrick J. Buchanan
Conservative Political Action Committee
Arlington, Virginia January 21, 2000

alt

The elites have two candidates; Middle America has none. We mean to change that. Let me outline for you a Freedom Agenda, a Populist Agenda, a Conservative Agenda, a Reform Agenda that, if I am nominated, we will offer you and the American people ...

 

My friends, it is good to be here at the 27th gathering of CPAC, the Conservative Political Action Committee. Among today’s speakers, I may be the only one who spoke at the first gathering CPAC, back in the Watergate days of 1973.

Let me recall briefly the history of our movement. It took life in Chicago in 1960, when Barry Goldwater stood up at that Republican convention and roared: “Let’s grow up, conservatives, we can take this party back.” Four years later, we did take our party back, and we nominated Mr. Conservative himself for President of the United States.

But after the assassination of John F. Kennedy and the liberal lie that the American Right “created the climate” in which Lee Harvey Oswald, a Communist, murdered the president, Sen. Goldwater went down to crushing defeat—as did we. But we did not quit. Sixteen years later, we took back our country, and elected Ronald Reagan President of the United States. It is now forty years since I heard Barry Goldwater speak those words in Chicago, twenty years since Ronald Reagan captured the White House. Let us look back at what we have accomplished, and what we have failed to do—as we conservatives set our compass for a new century.

In the field of electoral politics we have triumphed. In 1964 we captured the Republican Party. In 1972, Richard Nixon routed FDR’s New Deal Coalition, capturing 49 states, creating a “New Majority Party.” Woodstock values were repudiated; then came Watergate. They said we were finished. But in 1980 we came back again, and the golden age of modern conservatism began.

Ronald Reagan restored the American spirit; he cut tax rates and unleashed the mighty engines of private enterprise that roar on to this day. He restored the might and morale of our armed forces. Greatest of all his achievements, he led America to victory in the Cold War. Try as they might, our liberal historians cannot deny the greatness of the real Man of the Century: Ronald Wilson Reagan. But that was yesterday, my friends. Now it is time that this generation of conservatives grew up and recognized that the Cold War is over, that the Day of Reagan is past. We can’t go home again.

Since Ronald Reagan returned to California a dozen years ago, his movement has been wandering in the desert. With no Evil Empire, no Cold War to unite us, we have subdivided into quarrelsome factions. In twelve years, our victories have been few. Even those have left us with ashes in our mouths. Our hopes of a second Revolution in 1994 sank in the mire of the old politics of compromise and capitulation. It is a time for truth. Since Reagan went home, Big Government has regained all its lost ground. President Bush turned his back on conservatism, raised taxes, imposed racial quotas on small business and declared that America’s mission in the world was to create “a New World Order.” The cheers from the UN and liberal media were thunderous.

As a result, the Republican party twice went down to defeat at the hands of Mr. Clinton, winning 38% and 41% of the vote, the most lopsided Republican defeats since the 1930s. But worse than defeat was the conservatives’ loss of faith and confidence. You know the truth as well as I: On issue after issue, Beltway Republicans have become the fellow travelers and secret collaborators of William Jefferson Clinton.

Today, on foreign policy, trade policy, immigration policy, Big Government and Beltway power, the two major parties have become inseparable twins. In handing out permanent NATO war guarantees for all of Eastern Europe, Bill Clinton trampled all over the wisdom of Washington and Jefferson—with the backing of the Republican Party. In appeasing China with permanent MFN, Bill Clinton today has the backing of the Republican Party. In his unconstitutional war on Serbia, Mr. Clinton had the backing of the foreign policy elite of the Republican Party. Bush and McCain were unhappy we didn’t send in 200,000 American troops. That is not conservatism; that is globalism -- and we reject it in the name of Washington, Jefferson, John Quincy Adams, Ronald Reagan, and all the other great patriot-presidents who put America First—ahead of anybody’s New World Order.

Clinton hails NAFTA, GATT, the WTO, and globalization; and like trained seals, Republicans clap in unison. Mr. Clinton favors open borders, a million new immigrants a year, and handing over high-tech jobs to low-wage workers from foreign lands. Bush and McCain cheer him on and the Congressional Republicans applaud.

Clinton calls for a vast increase in lending authority for the IMF and more foreign aid. A Republican Congress gives him everything he demands. Clinton asks for billions more for the Department of Education; a Republican Congress gives him more than he asks.

The Republican Party calls itself the party of limited government and low taxes. But after four years of George Bush and five years of a Republican Congress, can anyone name a single regulation that has been repealed, a single agency that has been abolished, a single tax that has been cut? Even that miserable little National Endowment for the Arts gamely soldiers on. What we are witnessing in national politics is the triumph of an old globalist named Carroll Quigley.

Years ago when Bill Clinton and I passed through Georgetown, there was a renowned teacher who wrote a book called Tragedy and Hope. In it Dr. Quigley wrote: The argument that the two parties should represent opposed ideals and politics...of the Right and...the Left, is a foolish idea...the two parties should be almost identical, so that the American people can ‘throw the rascals out’ without leading to any profound or extensive shifts in policy...” “It should be possible,” wrote Quigley, “to replace one party with the other party which will pursue, with new vigor, approximately the same basic policies.”

Quigley’s dream is America’s nightmare. Our two Beltway parties have become two wings of the same bird of prey, two arms of one national establishment that means to rule in perpetuity. Our two-party system is a fraud, a sham, a delusion. On foreign policy, trade, immigration, Big Government, we have one-party government, one party press; and conservatives are being played for suckers.

My friends, I left a Republican Party I served 35 years, because I believe my country deserves a real choice, not a choice between a second Bush Administration and a second Clinton Administration. We ought to have a broader range of candidates than either the son of a U.S. Senator from St. Alban’s and Harvard, or the son of a President from Andover and Yale. The elites have two candidates; Middle America has none. We mean to change that. Let me outline for you a Freedom Agenda, a Populist Agenda, a Conservative Agenda, a Reform Agenda that, if I am nominated, we will offer you and the American people.

First, we will not just prattle about the principle of federalism; we will make constitutionalism our compass. As control of welfare was returned to the states, we will return to parents, teachers and local school districts the decisions about the primary and secondary education of their children. We need a President who not only speaks up for parental choice, but who will shut down the U.S. Department of Education. George Bush won’t; I will. Goals 2000, School-to-Work, busing, the expulsion of God and the Ten Commandments from our schools, the indoctrination of children in the tenets of evolution and secular humanism, none of these were demanded by parents. All were imposed by federal bureaucrats, judges or the NEA, the dismal triangle that has made a hellish mess of American education. All three need to be expelled from the classrooms of America like the disruptive delinquents they are.

Half our federal Cabinet departments were created to service special interests: Education, Housing, and Transportation should be abolished and the money sent back in block grants to the states and taxpayers. If we believe in states right and states’ responsibilities, let us begin acting on that belief.

Second, if we are to survive as one nation and one people, and not break down into an ethnic war of all against all, all discrimination must be ended by the federal government. No man or woman should be held back because of race, color, or creed; and no man or woman should be given preferential treatment because of race, color or creed. Al Gore favors racial preferences; Mr. Bush refuses to fight them; the Reform Party and I will end them once and for all.

Unlike the timid and tongue-tied Mr. Bush and Mr. McCain, we are not afraid to speak up loudly for the God-given right to life of the unborn. Roe v Wade was an abomination; and if I name the next two Justices to the Supreme Court, it can be overturned. If elected, on January 22, 2001, the anniversary of Roe v Wade, I will issue an executive order overturning every executive order Bill Clinton made to make abortion on demand the policy of the United States Government.

Fourth, we will repeal the Bush and Clinton tax hikes, and tear the U.S. tax code up by its roots, cut tax rates across the board, and shift the burden off small businesses and American families onto global corporations, foreign companies, and Chinese Communists, who will no longer have overnight privileges in the Lincoln Bedroom.

Fifth, the looting of the American nation by global socialists of the IMF and World Bank will end. The time for foreign aid has come—and gone. It is a crime against justice that U.S. tax dollars are used to bail out the failed investments of Wall Street bankers, and pay the bills of corrupt regimes that vote against America’s interests again and again and again in the United Nations.

That brings me to our sixth commitment. Kofi Annan has said that only the United Nations can authorize the legitimate use of force in the world, that national sovereignty must give way to the UN’s right to intervene anywhere in defense of human rights. Under the new UN War Crimes Tribunal, American pilots can now be seized and prosecuted without America’s permission. Let me give you my word: When I raise my hand to take the oath, all surrenders of American sovereignty to any and all institutions of the New World Order come to an end. And if just one U.S. soldier, sailor or airman is seized by any UN police, we will send the Marines to get him back, and boot the United Nations so far out of the United States the next General Assembly will meet in Katmandu. American sovereignty is not negotiable, not now, not ever.

Seventh, the balance of power in the U.S. Government will be shifted away from bureaucrats and judges, back to the elected representatives of the American people. It is time to stop the kowtowing to the Supreme Court; and to confront the Justices with the authority of the Constitution itself, and the power of the people.

We shall begin real reform of our U.S. political system. The only people who will contribute to election campaigns will be citizens who vote in those campaigns, not corporations, and not unions. All contributions will be voluntary. All “soft money” will be outlawed. Congressional pensions shall be abolished. All members of Congress and federal judges will be subject to term limits, and the Supreme Court will be marched back into the narrow stalls intended for it by the Founding Fathers.

Eighth, as we are a republic, not an empire, all entangling alliances dating to a Cold War that has been over ten years will be reviewed. It is time the rich and prosperous nations of Asia and Europe started to carry, themselves, the full cost of their own defense, and stopped the freeloading off Uncle Sam.

Ninth, we will establish a new America First trade policy that cuts out the cancerous Clinton trade deficits and gives goods Made in the USA the same access to foreign markets that we give foreign goods in our markets. And if the WTO objects to the new America First trade policy, then, it is “adios muchachos” to the WTO. And unlike the Republican bellhops of the Business Roundtable, we will not take orders from the Fortune 500.

Lately, Thomas Donahue of the U.S. Chamber of Commerce warned members of Congress that if they vote against permanent MFN for China, they do so, “at their peril.” Well, I have an e-mail for Mr. Donahue: Go back and tell the boys at the Business Roundtable: Republicans may carry your golf bags; we don’t. If you bring up permanent MFN for China in this session of Congress, we will knock it down.

Finally, my friends, we cannot walk away from the cultural war for the soul of America, because it is about who we are, what we believe, what we stand for as a people. The outcome of that culture war will determine what kind of people we are, and what kind of society we shall become. And the ultimate question is this:

Is this God’s country? Are we commanded to conform our laws and our society to His will? Or has God’s law been expelled forever from the market place of American ideas and ideals? Once, we were God’s country. If we have the courage of that generation of young conservatives who heard Barry Goldwater and devoted their lives to the causes he and Ronald Reagan pursued, we can and shall prevail.

That’s where we are going. Come follow us.


62 posted on 06/05/2002 10:28:28 AM PDT by ex-snook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The Old Hoosier
For conservatives to get much more from Bush, we have to give him the Senate in November.

I agree, but I'm concerned that if we do give him the Senate, it may be infested with Moderate Republicans. This we do not need.
63 posted on 06/05/2002 10:30:54 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
I constantly hear that the only answer to every issue is all out pure conservatism, regardless of the circumstances. To me, that logic is no different than the cries that the military's only choice should be full-bore ahead, nuke 'em all. But circumstances, environment, limitations, and collateral results often destine such simple solutions to certain failure. That's where strategy comes in.

I have no doubt that many of the whiners here would have been b____ & moaning in the early '40's at Eisenhower and FDR, claiming they were weak, squandering, and missing opportunities. There was a lull after Pearl Harbor as we ramped up our war preparation.

I'm not advocating abandoning conservative principles, nor ignoring the ultimate goals of conservatism. But too many here have little grasp of the real world limitations that force tough decisions on picking one's battles. Please show me where Reagan actually reduced overall Federal gov't spending. Oh he certainly tried, but according to the logic of some here, there is a lot more he could have done. Why didn't he shut down the gov't, why did he compromise and sign environmental legislation, farm subsidies, and tax hikes. Many a time he compromised and gave an inch, I guess then that makes him a sellout?

64 posted on 06/05/2002 10:31:36 AM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Comment #65 Removed by Moderator

To: Howlin
but i must say, if gore (were he pres.) had done some of the things bush is being defended for now, the defenders would be screaming bloody murder about what a liberal statist, etc. gore is.

i do support bushs' stance re: second amnd.

66 posted on 06/05/2002 10:35:32 AM PDT by galt-jw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

Comment #67 Removed by Moderator

Comment #68 Removed by Moderator

To: Diddle E. Squat
There was a lull after Pearl Harbor as we ramped up our war preparation.

Do you see obvious signs that we are "ramp[ing] up our war preparation"? Are our borders any more secure than they were on September 10th?

I'm sorry, I see Bush fiddling with socialist programs while his VP admits that terrorists will be getting and using nukes and there is "nothing" we can do about. And I hear that right now there are terrorist cells still operating within this country planning the next attack while the FBI is busy re-arranging deck chairs on the Titanic and the politicized, gutted CIA is still operating under a Clinton appointee.

Heck, Bush comes back from Europe after - we think - drumming up support for a future attack on other terrorist sponsoring countries like Iraq, etc. What was the first speech he made upon returning? Was it a major policy speech or announcement of how things went in Europe in talking to our allies? No. It was some crap about "authtentic"[sic] black music and his desire for an African American Cultural Museum or some such crap. I expect more from a wartime president. I would have expected more from Eisenhower and FDR too if this was the crap they were pulling after Japan attacked.

69 posted on 06/05/2002 10:41:04 AM PDT by Spiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

Comment #70 Removed by Moderator

To: rightwing2
"President Bush has undertaken a major effort to remake the GOP in "his" image, alienating many of his conservative supporters in the process."

Nonsense. Bush has 90% support of Republicans and 75% support of the nation at large. Someone would have to either be clueless or deliberately lying to claim that 90% base or 75% national support was equal to "many" being alienated.

Also, the author neglects to mention that Bush killed the Kyoto Treaty on Global Warming. Does anyone here honestly think that killing that treaty is something favored by Earth-In-The-Balance leftists?!

71 posted on 06/05/2002 10:45:43 AM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
Ron Paul/Tancredo, 2004 ... then maybe we can do something about the invasion of illegal aliens!

g

72 posted on 06/05/2002 10:47:15 AM PDT by Geezerette
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: TonyRo76
removing the left-wing American Bar Association (ABA) from the "vetting" process for nominees to the Federal bench?

What's it matter if they never bring the nominee to a vote?
73 posted on 06/05/2002 10:48:14 AM PDT by Registered
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
I have spent the last three days looking at sites from the government, independent scientific groups, and greenies.

The research does not confirm what you say, nor does it refute it. My degree is in geology and I took several courses in environmental and climatology areas. I understand how to read the charts.

The data is ambiguous, and more study is needed. My best guess is that there is a slight degree of warming, but that man-made causes are a minimal part of the entire picture.

74 posted on 06/05/2002 10:50:18 AM PDT by Miss Marple
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

Comment #75 Removed by Moderator

To: Registered
"Or are you too busy on the phone with pollsters?"

ROFL

76 posted on 06/05/2002 10:50:58 AM PDT by F16Fighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: massadvj
"I can't imagine how Al Gore would have been worse."

Al Gore (AKA Mr. Earth In The Balance) wouldn't have killed the Kyoto Treaty on Global Warming.

Al Gore wouldn't have withdrawn the U.S. from the Soviet ABM treaty.

But hey, you aren't a Conservative, are you? I mean, you don't want the U.S. to defend itself with Bush's national missile defense, right? You think that pulling the U.S out of the U.S. - CCCP ABM treaty is a "liberal" policy, don't you?

77 posted on 06/05/2002 10:51:02 AM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: WhiteGuy
"I don't have a bit of confidence that bush would nomiate a conservative."

What would you call Ashcroft's nomination for Attorney General, a liberal?!

78 posted on 06/05/2002 10:53:16 AM PDT by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Miss Marple
The research does not confirm what you say, nor does it refute it.

Understandable - the research is widely differing in its methodology and conclusions.

My degree is in geology and I took several courses in environmental and climatology areas. I understand how to read the charts.

Didn't mean to insinuate that you didn't, MM. I'm just hanging my hat on the upper atmospheric temps remaining steady, which has been supported by a number of researchers (but as you say there's no consensus).

79 posted on 06/05/2002 10:53:33 AM PDT by NittanyLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: rightwing2
Bush is no conservative

No, he's not, and neither was GHWB. Both are somewhat to the right of middle-of-the-road moderate. We have known this all along.

80 posted on 06/05/2002 10:56:07 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 261-278 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson