Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush out to beef up presidency
The Detroit News/Drudge Report ^ | 05.20.02 | Bill Straub / Scripps Howard News Service

Posted on 05/20/2002 10:36:24 AM PDT by callisto

Edited on 05/07/2004 7:08:50 PM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last
To: Prince Caspian
"You are easily frightened. You wouldn't have a predisposed agenda, would you?"

Now who's passing around the tin-foil hat? Besides, it is indeed a frightening thing when a political party's grassroots movement no longer keeps their public leaders accountable for their actions while in office.

81 posted on 05/21/2002 7:45:16 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
"And would that include Bush upholding his oath of office and FAITHFULLY EXECUTING THE LAWS of this land where the democRAT criminals of the last 9 years are concerned? THAT is the part of the Presidency that Bush needs to attend to ... after 9 years of the Clinton's using the office to subvert the Constitution and our laws. And frankly, I'll believe what the RNC has to say the day they publicize the Riady non-refund, a blockbluster which they never even bothered to mention on their website or announcements. Why would the RNC ignore something that significant?"

Keep preaching it BeAChooser. We need faithful and dedicated patriots like you around.

82 posted on 05/21/2002 7:49:54 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: freeeee
"It is an absurd assertion that the powers of the executive office have been diminished over the last 30 years. They have grown at every turn."

You are absolutely correct, anyone who says otherwise does not know their history. George Washington never even used his veto power while in office, because he was concerned about over-asserting his executive powers.

83 posted on 05/21/2002 7:52:38 PM PDT by FreedominJesusChrist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: callisto
Fein said that while it's appropriate to cite national security at times, it's ridiculous to claim that anyone will be inhibited by his or her communications with the president if the information is made public.

Bill Clinton.. sleeezy phone sex,subject to blackmail, perjury...HELLO!

84 posted on 05/21/2002 7:55:56 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Askel5
BUMP
85 posted on 05/22/2002 8:20:37 AM PDT by Scholastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson