[RAT Patrol]

I assume they were not unemployed to begin with so no one would be denying them employment. There is no way I believe they were the best people for the job and just happened to be gay. They were stategically chosen for political purposes. In that case the goal is to normalize immorality. That is very different from a private matter. No one is saying "We are hiring these adulterers and we are proud of it because they are so qualified for the job so who cares if they are cheating on their wife..." If they advertise their sexuality then let them get a job in the private sector. Bush is wrong on this one and he is aiding the normalization of a very abnormal and harmful behavior.

You wouldn't say "So what if he uses cocaine" or "so what if he mutilates his body" or any other harmful to self act. Bush is a fool.

[gcruse]

 
You wouldn't say "So what if he uses cocaine" or
"so what if he mutilates his body" or any other harmful to self act.

You know, you may have a point.  All those smokers in
civil service are driving up health premiums.  Fire all
cigarette smokers for self-harm and hire no more.  </sarcasm>

[sinkspur]

Since you brought religion up....are you gonna tell them like Jesus did "go and sin no more"?

I'm not Jesus. He's welcome to tell them that if He wishes to.

Their is no way I believe you would approve of an appointment of a known and ongoing adulterer who would bring the "other woman" to government events. Your statements say that you think it is moral behavior.

Are the gay people acting gay at work?

Did the fact that Rudy Guliani was living in adultery affect his handling of 9/11?

I care about what people do at work. If somebody's adultery or their gay activities get in the way of work, then deal with that.

I trust you're not an executive, peeping into people's private lives to determine whether or not they're "moral" in your eyes.

[Dave S]

If they advertise their sexuality then let them get a job in the private sector. Bush is wrong on this one and he is aiding the normalization of a very abnormal and harmful behavior

So these four candidates wear signs saying they are gay? Or do they wear gay clothes to the office? Or do they have sex in the office? Do they hit on their male counterparts? How does anyone know these guys are gay unless you tell us.

What if someone else in the future wanted to ban "holy rollers" from the government because they tended to be hate mongers? Seems you're in risky territory making this kind of claim given you're not in the mainstream.

[sneakypete]

In that case the goal is to normalize immorality.

How is this normalizing homosexuality in any way? These people will dissapear into the woodwork,and never seen again by the public once they start work. None are high-profile public positions.

BTW,has Bubba-2 replaced the homosexual ambassador to Belgium? If not,why not? THAT was something worthy of all the negative attention,not some dweeb or geek being hired to shuffle papers in some bureaucracy.