Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

They're Coming After You
Worldnetdaily/Creators Syndicate, Inc. | 3-6-02 | Walter Williams

Posted on 03/06/2002 5:21:26 AM PST by farmall

They're coming after you

Posted: March 6, 2002 by: Walter Willaims

1:00 a.m. Eastern

© 2002 Creators Syndicate, Inc.

Most Americans were pleased with the legislative attack on cigarette smokers, not to mention confiscatory tobacco taxes. We reveled in the Environmental Protection Agency's dishonest study concluding that second-hand smoke causes cancer. And, by the way, I'd like to hear whether the Food and Drug Administration would sanction pharmaceutical companies employing EPA's research methods to test drug safety – and if not, why not?

The real reason for the attack on smokers is that many people are offended by the tobacco odor. Unfortunately, in their quest to eliminate tobacco fumes, Americans are willing to trade away constitutional principles and rule of law.

Tyrants are never satisfied. They've lined up new victims. Surgeon General David Satcher has provided them with ammunition by describing obesity as America's No. 1 killer, costing 300,000 lives annually. As a result of cardiovascular disease, diabetes and other obesity-related illnesses, it's costing us billions upon billions of health dollars. That means, according to John Banzhaf of George Washington University School of Law and other tyrants, America's food industry is to blame and liable. New York University Professor Marion Nestle agrees, saying that the food industry "can't behave like cigarette companies. ... Yet there's a lot of people who benefit from people being fat and sick, and the whole setup is designed to make people eat more. So the response to the food industry should be very similar to what happened with the tobacco companies."

The Center for Science in the Public Interest is one of the Washington lobbies that wants to control what we eat. These tyrants not only propose taxes on what they deem as non-nutritious foods, they've also proposed a 5 percent tax on new television sets and video equipment, and a $65 tax on each new car or an extra penny per gallon of gas. You might ask why tax these items? CSPI Nazis see watching television and videos, and riding instead of walking, as contributing to obesity. And, as they see it, just as tobacco companies were responsible for people smoking, television manufacturers are responsible for people being couch potatoes, automobile companies are responsible for people riding instead of walking and the food industry is responsible for people eating too much.

Mothers Against Drunk Driving has joined these tyrants. No reasonable person advocates drunk driving, but MADD has another agenda. It wishes to outlaw driving even after having one drink. It has successfully pushed Congress to lower the blood/alcohol level for a drunk-driving arrest to .08 percent. But its true agenda was revealed by Steve Simon, chairman of the Minnesota State DUI Task Force, when he said: "If .08 percent is good, .05 percent is better. That's where we're headed. It doesn't mean that we should get there all at once. But ultimately it should be .02 percent."

That's the way Nazis work – incrementally. If they had demanded Congress make the blood/alcohol .02, they wouldn't have gotten anything – not even .08 percent. I wouldn't be surprised if their ultimate agenda is alcohol prohibition.

The Center for Consumer Freedom keeps up-to-date information on these and other tyrants. You might say, "What's the fuss, Williams? These people will never get away with controlling what we eat and drink!" Think again. In the '60s, when the anti-smoking zealots were simply asking for smoking and non-smoking sections on airplanes, no one would have ever anticipated today's tobacco taxes, laws and regulations.

Most evil done in the world is done in the name of promoting this or that good. By turning away from rule of law and constitutional government, Americans are following in the footsteps of the decent Germans, who during the 1920s and '30s built the Trojan Horse that enabled Hitler to take over. --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

WorldNetDaily contributor Walter E. Williams is the John M. Olin Distinguished Professor of Economics at George Mason University in Fairfax, Va.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial
KEYWORDS: pufflist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last
some people i know thought the tabacco suits were just fine,i told my wife then that i could use the same reasoning to sue the local all you can eat buffet.

now here we go

1 posted on 03/06/2002 5:21:26 AM PST by farmall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: farmall
The difference as I see it is that I can sit beside the 'all you can eat buffet' all day while other people gorge & I won't gain one single pound. I can't sit beside even one smoker while he puffs with out my asthma kicking in. I'm not worried about the cancer aspect, at least not for me, but asthma occurs within minutes.
2 posted on 03/06/2002 5:31:07 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmall
Once again, another giant I TOLD YOU SO for Limbaugh. He, virtually alone, said that fatty food would be target #1 after the nico nazi were sucessful with their tobacco shakedown.

He was right on SUVs too. His ability to predict the future is better than anyone else on the political front.

3 posted on 03/06/2002 5:33:57 AM PST by Phantom Lord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmall
I wish I could go and take some of Mr. Williams classes, at George Mason.
Love listening to him on Rush, This man is one of the smartest I have ever heard or read.
The problem is how do we stop the madness.
4 posted on 03/06/2002 5:34:24 AM PST by vin-one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: farmall
In the '60s, when the anti-smoking zealots were simply asking for smoking and non-smoking sections on airplanes, no one would have ever anticipated today's tobacco taxes, laws and regulations.

Williams is wrong here; many people knew and railed about the incremental nature of the zealot's assault. These people were dubbed "alarmists", or "reactionaries" or "tobacco executives", and denouced as "evil".
5 posted on 03/06/2002 5:34:45 AM PST by motzman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Then get up and move. It is a very large country and no one is requiring you to sit beside that person who is smoking - no matter where it is.

And no, I'm not a cigarette smoker.

6 posted on 03/06/2002 5:36:06 AM PST by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: farmall
Let me know when the mandatory minimums for cigarettes and cheeseburgers kick in. Maybe I'll give a damn.
7 posted on 03/06/2002 5:39:51 AM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Mandatory minimums? Huh?
8 posted on 03/06/2002 5:43:50 AM PST by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: farmall
What is ominous is the ease with which some people go from saying that they don't like something to saying that the government should forbid it.

When you go down that road, don't expect freedom to survive very long.

- Thomas Sowell

MKM

9 posted on 03/06/2002 5:46:26 AM PST by mykdsmom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mykdsmom
Gee, I wonder what our newly elected senator's stance will be on this < /sarcasm>. It's bad for you, so you don't need it or shouldn't use it. Guns, seatbelts, and coming soon to a tobacco field near you, higher taxes on our state's #1 legal cash crop. May God have mercy on tobacco growers in this state.
10 posted on 03/06/2002 5:51:18 AM PST by billbears
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
Are you really do dense that you don't get my point?
11 posted on 03/06/2002 5:58:29 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Phantom Lord
Once again, another giant I TOLD YOU SO for Limbaugh. He, virtually alone, said that fatty food would be target #1 after the nico nazi were sucessful with their tobacco shakedown.

Well if you need Rush to tell you that then you aren't too swift

But you ain't gonna see alcohol with all the boozers in congress
12 posted on 03/06/2002 6:02:57 AM PST by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
Bottom line. The government has no business telling us what we can eat, drink or whatever. They have no business telling me I have to wear a seat belt in my car "for my own good". I don't smoke, don't abuse alcohol, don't use drugs, wear my seatbelt, and wear my helmet while riding my motorcycle. I exercise 4-5 times a week, and have a low-fat, low-sodium diet. I make these choices for myself for MY OWN GOOD. I don't need some government pinhead legislating common sense to me.
13 posted on 03/06/2002 6:09:25 AM PST by wjcsux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
No, I'm not dense (thanks for the cheap, personal shot). I get your point about someone else's eating not affecting you like smoking near you kicks in your asthma, I just don't agree with your conclusion that because of that, the government should regulate - if not ban - smoking.

See post #9.

14 posted on 03/06/2002 6:10:11 AM PST by SW6906
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
Are you really do dense that you don't get my point?

Well, if you want to start hurling insults...

Are you really so lazy that you can't get up and move away from the smoker?

BTW, I am a smoker, but as a courtesy I do not expose others to my habit, I go outside, even at home.

15 posted on 03/06/2002 6:14:22 AM PST by ravingnutter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: SW6906
Then you have never had asthma.
16 posted on 03/06/2002 6:15:31 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: farmall
Thanks for posting this. Williams, as usual, is brilliant. Now if we could only get him elected President...
17 posted on 03/06/2002 6:15:56 AM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jimt
i'd vote for him

almost if not all his articles i read i agree with

18 posted on 03/06/2002 6:19:45 AM PST by farmall
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
I can't sit beside even one smoker while he puffs with out my asthma kicking in.

Before all the laws were passed limiting where smoking was permitted you could just tell the smokers of your condition and they would generally snuff them out without protest. But now that the smokers are feeling defensive about their habit most often you get some rude comment about this being the smoking area and to get lost. I know because my daughter is allergic to smoke and I’ve dealt with this issue for 20 years now. I was a smoker until my daughter was born.

It is sad to think that in this country we have replaced manners with laws. If manners were still taught in the home and at school most people would see these laws as unnecessary.

19 posted on 03/06/2002 6:23:44 AM PST by Gaston
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter
I do move away, all the time. Then there are times like last night, when I am half way thru dinner (in the non smoking section) when a guy at the table next to me but across that invisable line that denotes the smoking section, desides to light up while perusing his menu. Then he has another after ordering & is still smoking when his food comes so he doesn't put it out while he eats, he lets it sit there & smolder. What do you do, get your food in a box & eat at home? My question, why can't that guy get HIS food in a box & smoke at home? He was the only smoker in the reataurant & he bothered at least 20 people. Thats why smokers are hated.
20 posted on 03/06/2002 6:27:33 AM PST by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-198 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson