Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mrsmith
[Now, you kooks go back to having your ball]

It doesn't occur to you to question the effect of this ruling or why the DoJ should expend resources in defending it, does it? You'd better think twice before referring to your fellow FReepers as "kooks", boy. You just never know when you'll have to face us at a FReep.

Of course, you might just feel secure in your insults by the fact that you never plan on attending any FReep in the future. That would make you something less than a FReeper, wouldn't it?

254 posted on 02/27/2002 4:18:24 AM PST by Twodees
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies ]


To: Twodees
Your anger at me for finding out why the DOJ is in this case should be directed at those who encouraged you in concocting a fantasy without first looking at the facts..

If you stick around FR a while and you'll find it's best to just admit your errors.

Cheer up, there are plenty of kooky theories that can't be so simply blown away by facts.

256 posted on 02/27/2002 6:30:57 AM PST by mrsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 254 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson