Bush Administration Lawyers Defending Hillary - Gratis

NewsMax ^ | 2/21/02 | Limbacher

[Tumbleweed_Connection]

If there ever was a vast right wing conspiracy, this much is now clear: it certainly never included President Bush - whose Justice Department is now defending New York Sen. Hillary Clinton in a lawsuit brought by Clinton White House whistleblower Sheryll Hall and Judicial Watch.

Over their objections, "the Bush Justice Department represents Hillary Clinton in this lawsuit free of charge, saying that it is in its 'discretion' to represent private parties," the legal watchdog group said in a press release Wednesday.

Hall was the White House computer expert who alleged that Mrs. Clinton was part of a conspiracy to force her out of her job after she told investigators about a data base compiled on the former first lady's instructions that illegally used White House social lists for Democratic Party fund-raising.

Hall also exposed the White House e-mail scandal, where millions of subpoenaed e-mails on some of the most serious Clinton scandals were withheld from investigators.

But despite her heroic efforts to expose Clinton White House wrongdoing, Justice Department lawyers were arguing against Hall yesterday - and instead for Hillary Clinton, a sight that was nearly too much to take for Judicial Watch Chairman Larry Klayman.

"I had to shake my head in wonderment at the sight of the Bush Justice Department working hand in hand with the DNC to defend the Hillary Clinton-led conspiracy to use the White House computer systems for illegal fund-raising," he complained.

"Rather than improperly giving Hillary Clinton free legal representation in this private lawsuit, the Bush Justice Department ought to be prosecuting her for this illegal database and retaliation."

[sneakypete]

Now you tell me. Is that the same as "forbidden" which is the term you used previously?

Yes,are you a "quota graduate" that has to ask the obvious? If it wasn't forbidden,why would anyone have to ask permission?

Okay, I will.

No surprise there.

You and I believe approximately 0% of everything the former prez has to say on any subject.

Bubba-1 will tell the truth when it is to his advantage. Why not? He can't tell the difference between the truth and a lie anyway,so it's all the same to him.

But you lock onto this obvious boast by a pimply-faced young Bill as the gospel truth and you translate his "information most Americans didn't have" into Bill had access to top secret intelligence.

Only because he WAS a intern working for the Senate Foreign Relations Committee,and because he DID have access to classified information.

Influence with whom? LBJ hated his guts and referred to him as "Halfbright." Nixon loved him less.

Right. As one of the most powerful US Senators of his era,Fulbright didn't have any influence at all. A virtual nobody,right?

[sneakypete]

Eloquence too! How clever. Now if we can just find some facts to help you out.

I'm clever enough and have enough facts to say outright that either/both you and your wife are lying about her having a CIB. Care to prove me wrong? What is her MOS,and what unit was she assigned to when she "won" (ROFLMAO!)"her" CIB? What unit and position is she assigned to now?

[catpuppy]

Hillary would need to do similarly. Shrub has voulunteered to extract her from that difficulty.

You make charges without any evidence.

You must be new in town not to be aware of any of this.

Another wrong assumption. You must be new in town.

Bush needs to be held accountable for his actions the same as anybody else. He's getting Hillary off the hook.

You are repeating your charges. Unfortunately, each time you repeat them without giving any evidence to substantiate them, you further weaken whatever case you were trying to make. Again, you might find it useful to read the court cases--or have someone explain them to you.

Bush is aiding and protecting her from just consequences of her actions

Same song third verse.

What is there about any of this that is hard for you to understand.

I understand you perfectly.

[RLK]

I can see at this point there is no agreement between us on what constitutes basic reality, logic, or internal contradiction.

This crack about: Hillary would need to do similarly. Shrub has voulunteered to extract her from that difficulty. You make charges without any evidence... is a winnrer. If Hillary didn't need or want lawyers to represent her, there would be no need to give her a free well-connected legal staff, would there? There's no need for her to pay for it herself to extract her out of the difficulties she brought on herself, is there?

[catpuppy]

I'm clever enough and have enough facts to say outright that either/both you and your wife are lying about her having a CIB. Care to prove me wrong?

Uh Yes, I do care to do that. Sober up and read my lips: I don't know what a "CIB" is (but I guess you mean Combat Infantryman's Badge?). I certainly have never claimed to have one (last time I checked the USAF was not infantry) nor have I claimed one for my wife (who has never been in the military). So tell me "clever one with facts," what are you talking about? And by the way, this is yet another instance of Bush Bashers making outrageous, unfounded claims. Thank you again for making that point.

[Mortimer Snavely]

That dunce cap was no joke. After reading some of your posts, it's plain that only want to irritate the grownups. You know nothing. Nothing.

[catpuppy]

You know nothing. Nothing.

Thanks. Coming from you that means a lot to me. :)

[sneakypete]

Uh Yes, I do care to do that. Sober up and read my lips: I don't know what a "CIB" is (but I guess you mean Combat Infantryman's Badge?). I certainly have never claimed to have one

My apologies. I had you confused with another HorseHillary artist here on FR. The two of you sound so much alike.

[Pagey]

A "Will Wonders ever Cease"? BUMP

[catpuppy]

No apology necessary. I rather enjoyed you proving that your "facts" are not. Have a good evening.