[Vercingetorix]

"That's mere conjecture, not science. One can't say that "every living thing is an example of natural processes" any more conclusively than one can say that "every living thing is an example of intelligent intervention." We simply don't have the data to conclusively say either, scientifically." -- Southack

It is not conjecture. Living things really do exist. Don't you have a garden? Did you never have a pet? Ever been to the zoo? Every process that occurs in living organisms can be understood in purely natural terms.

[Southack]

"That's mere conjecture, not science. One can't say that "every living thing is an example of natural processes" any more conclusively than one can say that "every living thing is an example of intelligent intervention." We simply don't have the data to conclusively say either, scientifically." -- Southack

"It is not conjecture. Living things really do exist

On the contrary, it is conjecture because we have no conclusive proof that the origin of Life was either from natural processes or from intelligent design.

This has nothing to do with whether things really do exist after they are created, either, since the central question is how they are created. That Life exists is not in dispute by anyone besides yourself (and only then because you didn't understand the very debate at hand)...