If that was true then it would conclusively refute and scientifically disprove natural selection (as responsible for the narrow issue of creation of life, at least) because natural processes are prone to losing data after enough natural events have passed, and only intelligent design has been shown to be able to retain all data for any reasonable length of time.
For instance, a rock doesn't retain the data for its precise original shape for its existence prior to being eroded by natural processes, nor do acids prior to interacting with bases.
Finish reading the previous post. Deletions excepted and mutation rates noted. It is the very presence of time dependent deterioration that is being measured.
This evidence is entirely and only capable of being interpreted in favor of evolution. It absolutely refutes intelligent design.