On Capitol Hill yesterday, the hypocrisy was so thick you could slice it with a knife.Democrats who, during the Clinton years, blithely shrugged off damning evidence of high level bribery, kickbacks, and payoffs suddenly morphed into born-again "reformers" yesterday, railing sanctimoniously against the 'corrupting' 'influence' of "soft money" contributions on politics. All the talk was Enron, Enron, Enron -- as if Chinagate had never happened.
The tartuffery was naueating.
Here was Rep. Marty Meehan of Massachusetts, a 'see-no-evil-hear-no-evil' apologist for Clinton corruption, breathlessly lecturing his colleagues on integrity and probity, sans the faintest hint of shame or irony.
Or take Democrat Rep. Steny Hoyer of Maryland, who in 1998 condemned the House impeachment probe as a "coordinated effort to harass...to really undermine the ability of the [Clinton] White House to do the business expected of it."
Three years later, Hoyer turns a new leaf. Yeah, right.
So, now that Shays-Meehan has passed the House, what's next?
Much to the chargin of the McCainiacs, it ain't over quite yet. The bill now heads for the Senate, where it likely will face new challenges. Sen. Robert Torricelli of New Jersey has already labeled "problematic" the House's decision to drop a key provision in the Senate-passed version requiring broadcasters to offer politicians ad time at special low rates. McCain-Feingold won with less than 60 votes in the Senate, so a filibuster is not out of the question.
If Torricelli switches sides and joins a filibuster, all bets will be off. The beauty of this scenario: The McCainiacs will only have themselves to blame.
Initially, the so-called "reformers" tried to muscle this turkey through the House sans legitimate debate on amendments. Their 'my-way-or-the-highway' hubris was illustrative. It underscored the sinister -- but thinly concealed -- purpose behind this bare-knuckle attack on the Bill of Rights, namely, to gag and de-fund the right.
Here's the deal: To lefties, the only thing standing in the way of socialist paradise here in America is 'evil' campaign money. Particularly donations from business interests.
The demise of Hillary-care was widely "blamed" on those memorable 'Harry and Louise' ads, which the media branded "misleading" and "deceptive".
But they weren't. Those ads exposed the fangs behind the smile of Hillary-care, an attempted coup detat over 1/7 of the U.S. economy.
In fact, the ads were devastating precisely because they were honest and candid. They conveyed the fatal flaws of Hillary-care in language everyone could understand and relate to.
Make no mistake: Just as Hillary-care was but the first step towards the total Sovietization of healthcare, McCain-Feingold/Shays-Meehan is merely the first phase towards the complete nationalization of American politics. The left aims to squelch all Harry and Louise voices of dissent.
Mandatory public financing of all elections and a ban on all independent political advertizing would pave the way.
To achieve that ultimate objective, McCain-Feingold/Shays-Meehan constitute the necessary opening preamble. By compromising even an inch on the first amendment -- and these bills go well beyond that -- the precedent for government control over grassroots/independent political activities will have been set, greasing the skids for more draconian controls down the road -- after the next round of "reforms". The "reformers", newly emboldened, will come back for more -- again and again.
McCain-Feingold is only dress-rehersal.
At the end of this slippery-slope, in a world where private campaign expenditures are outlawed, politicians will no longer feel constrained to bend to business and corporate interests. Ergo: Socialism flows inexorably out of this new political landscape.
I'm convinced that's the cynical purpose behind the mad rush for "campaign finance reform".
But, for the "reformers", there's still one major hurdle: The U.S. Constitution.
The McCain-Feingold/Shays-Meehan provision prohiting independent political advertizing weeks prior to elections can not pass constitutional muster. Not under the judiciary as currently constituted, that is.
Despite eight years of leftist appointments to the bench under Clinton-Gore, constitutionalists still out-number usurpers where it matters most: The U.S. Supreme Court.
That's where McCain-Feingold/Shays-Meehan would ultimately land, where it would ultimately be vetted IF -- and that's a big IF -- it were to become law.
My two cents...
"JohnHuang2"
They will have no opposition because issue ads will not be able to be run by groups who could make clear the lies that are being perpetrated.
THE RATS CONTROL EVERY SINGLE MAJOR MEDIA OUTLET IN THIS COUNTRY. EVen Fox - now with Whoraldo and Great on.
On the non cable "news" shows - and on programs such as 60 minutes whose pro-Clinton defense piece was aired right before the 92 election - RAT BASTARDS WILL BE ABLE TO GET ON THERE AND GET THEIR MESSAGE ACROSS WITH ZERO OPPOSITION AND INFORMATION ALLOWED BY THE GROUPS WHO ARE SUPPORTED BY MR. AND MRS. AVERAGE AMERICAN!
What this also means is that Mr. and Mrs. AVerage American who support the NRA, for instance, will find out that the NRA is not very effective any longer fighting for their pro-2nd amendment rights and will stop supporting the NRA.
This piece of legislation is the worst to come before the Congress since HIllary care.
IN fact, I predict, it will allow HIllarycare to be put into place.
Further, it proves to the Clinton led Rat Party that they have the Republicrats in the palm of their hands and therefore it paves the way for further such "victories" for those who want to destroy us.
I am totally disgusted that the Republican party HEAD - our President - cannot defeat the Rats in his own party - and now is being forced to veto this legislation (something I want him to do with all my might) or to let it go and suffer the consequences.
Again, my party supports these liberal traitors. They have just killed my country and I refuse to be a party to their atrocity. If President Bush has the internal strength and character that I think he does, HE MUST veto this bill no matter what else happens. If he does not - and I say this with all the seriousness I possess - it is OVER for this nation. There will be no more chance to take it back......watch and see.
IMHO, they are alot more concerned with grassroots and semi grassroots organizations informing their members of the cannidates real positions and voting records, as opposed to the tornado strength spin the cannidates put out in the last 60 to 90 days of the campaign.
Mandatory public financing of all elections and a ban on all independent political advertizing would pave the way.First, get it right <VBG>; it's McShame-Slimeroad/Shames-Noman Conservative Elimination Act of 2002. This elevates the role of the media from watchdogs to kingmakers, as the electronic portion no longer will have to give us a voice through advertisements, and they have sole control over who is on their "news and interview" shows (which will, as Rush pointed out, become unpaid ads). As the dominant media culture is socialist, that's what we'll be consigned to.To achieve that ultimate objective, McCain-Feingold/Shays-Meehan constitute the necessary opening preamble. By compromising even an inch on the first amendment -- and these bills go well beyond that -- the precedent for government control over grassroots/independent political activities will have been set, greasing the skids for more draconian controls down the road -- after the next round of "reforms". The "reformers", newly emboldened, will come back for more -- again and again.
McCain-Feingold is only dress-rehersal.
At the end of this slippery-slope, in a world where private campaign expenditures are outlawed, politicians will no longer feel constrained to bend to business and corporate interests. Ergo: Socialism flows inexorably out of this new political landscape.
Tonight I am really sick, as the man I hoped to support in the opening battle towards the ultimate removal of Tom Daschle from power, my Congressman at Large, John Thune, for purely politcal reasons, voted with the Constitutional Pirates.
From what I have gathered so far, he will get away with crapping on his base. I can't describe adequately the feelings I currently have. It is akin to the mourning process.
Are there no real leaders out there any longer who stand on principle? Is every position taken for purely political gain? And worse, where are the people demanding principles before partisan party political power?
Thanks to Mr. Thunes action last night, this night I have similar feelings to which I felt, when it became crystal clear that Trent Lott was not going to allow a "real trial" in the Senate Impeachment dog and pony show.
I am back to tagging my rants with ...