Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

County of the Scopes Trial Is Told To Halt Bible Classes in Schools
New York Times ^ | Saturday, February 9, 2002

Posted on 02/09/2002 12:00:32 AM PST by JohnHuang2

February 9, 2002

County of the Scopes Trial Is Told To Halt Bible Classes in Schools

By THE ASSOCIATED PRESS

CHATTANOOGA, Tenn., Feb. 8 — The Tennessee county where the Scopes Monkey Trial of 1925 resulted in a verdict favoring the classroom teaching of biblical creationism over evolution was ordered today by a federal district judge here to stop holding Bible classes in its elementary schools.

The classes, held in Rhea County for 51 years, violate the constitutional separation of church and state, said the judge, R. Allan Edgar.

The 30-minute classes were held weekly for about 800 students in kindergarten through fifth grade at the county's three elementary schools. Parental consent was not required, though pupils were allowed to participate in alternative activities if they objected to the classes.

A couple with two children in the schools sued over the classes, which were taught by students from Bryan College, a Christian institution in Dayton, the Rhea County seat, some 40 miles north of here.

Bryan College is named for William Jennings Bryan, the orator who assisted the state prosecutor in the Scopes trial, held in Dayton 77 years ago. Bryan squared off in that trial against Clarence Darrow, who defended John T. Scopes, a schoolteacher charged with violating a state law that barred the teaching of lessons contradicting the Bible's account of human creation. Scopes was found guilty and fined $100, though his conviction was later thrown out on a technicality by the Tennessee Supreme Court.

In the Bible classes case, the Rhea County school system contended that the lessons included "character education." But the judge ruled that county school officials "acted with both purpose and effect to endorse and advance religion in the public schools."

The identities of the parents who sued have not been disclosed. A branch of the Freedom From Religion Foundation, a group based in Madison, Wis., that promotes separation of church and state, was also a plaintiff.

"We are always happy to see the wall of separation between church and state buttressed or strengthened," Dan Barker, a spokesman for the foundation, said of the decision.

John Mincey, chairman of the Rhea County school board, said the ruling would be appealed. "We still feel like we haven't had our day in court," he said.



TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: crevolist
Quote of the Day by Republic
1 posted on 02/09/2002 12:00:32 AM PST by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Total farce. The Constitution was written to protect religious people from the Federal government, not to allow the Feds to dictate to localities what they may and may not do in terms of religion.

"We are always happy to see the wall of separation between church and state buttressed or strengthened," Dan Barker, a spokesman for the foundation, said of the decision.
That's the Freedom From Religion Foundation speaking! Nevermind that when the Constitution was ratified, many of our states were virtual theocracies. Course, that's just 'cause the Founders didn't understand the Constitution they had just written and voted on, right Mr. Barker?

2 posted on 02/09/2002 1:32:10 AM PST by pariah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pariah;crevo_list
Here's another article about the ruling, this one from the FFRF (the organization that joined the lawsuit against the county). It includes extended quotes from the ruling, & I think shows the ruling was pretty much a no-brainer.


Forceful Opinion Calls Instruction Like "Sunday School Class"

Foundation's Legal Victory Today in "Scopes II" Case Halts Illegal Bible Instruction in Dayton, Tennessee Schools

February 8, 2002

The Rhea County Board of Education today was forcefully ordered by U.S. District Judge R. Allan Edgar of Chattanooga, TN, to stop conducting an illegal Bible Education Ministry program, the subject of a federal lawsuit taken by the national Freedom From Religion Foundation on behalf of parents with children in Rhea County public schools.

"Rhea County, Tennessee, is no stranger to religious controversy," writes Judge Edgar, in the opening of his 19-page decision. "In 1925, the Rhea County Courthouse was the site of the well known 'Scopes' or 'Monkey' trial, wherein high school teacher John Scopes was tried for violating a Tennessee statute making it a misdemeanor to teach 'evolution theory' in the State's public schools. The trial pitted William Jennings Bryan, the 'Great Commoner,' representing the State, against Clarence Darrow for the defense. The legacy of that trial in some respects gives rise to this lawsuit."

The Foundation's lawsuit on behalf of John Doe and Mary Roe, pitted the rights of the parents, who are under a protective court order in the hostile Dayton-area community, against an obdurate school system, which refused to honor more than five decades of Supreme Court precedent against religious instruction in the public schools.

The bible instruction, carried out for decades in grades kindergarten through five in three Rhea County elementary schools, has been taught during regular school hours for 30 minutes each week without parental consent. The bible program is operated by students from Bryan College (a bible-based college founded after the Scopes trial) to help public schools students become "exposed to the Bible," with no public school oversight. An assistant professor who is Director of Practical Christian Involvement supervises the program, which Judge Edgar characterized as what might be found in "a Sunday School class in many of the Christian churches in Rhea County."

"The lesson plans retained by Bryan College," Edgar wrote, "reveal that the children are being taught that the Bible conveys literal truth about God and Jesus Christ reflective of the Bryan College 'Statement of Belief,' " that the bible is literally true. Students are asked to memorize bible verses, act out skits of biblical stories, and sing songs such as "Jesus Loves Me," "My God Is So Great," "Pharaoh, Pharaoh," "Twelve Men Want to Spy on Canaan," "Shout to the Lord," "Change My Heart, Oh God," and "I'm In The Lord's Army."

At oral argument, the judge's decision noted, counsel for defendants even admitted the bible is being presented "as the truth."

Aside from the content, Edgar said, "the wholesale delegation of the administration of that program to Bryan College, a decidedly religious institution, by itself results in an impermissible entanglement of government and religion."

". . . the government, through its public school system, may not teach, or allow the teaching of a distinct religious viewpoint. This is what the Rhea County School Board has done by allowing the teaching of the Bible through the BEM program. . . [acting] with both the purpose and effect to endorse and advance religion in the public schools," Edgar wrote.

"The Rhea County courses are being taught to the youngest and most impressionable school children by college students who have no discernible educational training and no supervision by the school system."

"This is not a close case," Edgar observed, pointing out that since 1948, when McCollum v. Board of Education was decided by the Supreme Court, religious instruction in public schools has been barred. The Rhea County practices do not differ substantially from McCollum, "except that, if anything, they make out an even stronger case for violation of the Establishment Clause," Edgar concluded.

Vashti McCollum, the Champaign, Illinois mother who brought the McCollum challenge, is in her eighties, and is an honorary officer of the Foundation. The Foundation recently reprinted a new edition of her acclaimed account of her dramatic lawsuit, One Woman's Fight. Also cited as precedent is Abington v. Schempp, against prayers in public schools. Ed Schempp, who brought that case with his son, is also an honorary Foundation officer.

"We're delighted with Judge Edgar's eloquent opinion upholding the rights of public school children--who are a captive audience, to be free from such overt religious proselytizing," said Dan Barker, public relations director of the Freedom From Religion Foundation. "The Bible Education Ministry program was a flagrant and atavistic First Amendment violation. It's tremendously satisfying to see the wall of separation between church and state be reinforced by such a strong decision."

The lawsuit, filed in April 2001, arose after the school district ignored letters from the Freedom From Religion Foundation pointing out that the practice violates numerous Supreme Court decisions. The attorneys representing the Foundation and its plaintiffs are Joseph H. Johnston, Nashville, and Steve Doughty and Alvin Harris, Nashville.

John Doe, Mary Roe, and Freedom From Religion Foundation v. Sue Porter, Supt. of the Rhea County School System, and Rhea County Board of Education, U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee at Chattanooga, Case No. 1:01-cv-115

The Freedom From Religion Foundation, based in Madison, Wis., is a national association of freethinkers (atheists, agnostics and others) working since 1978 to keep church and state separate.

3 posted on 02/14/2002 12:37:16 PM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Oops, here's the link to the article above.
4 posted on 02/14/2002 12:37:58 PM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Who else should be pinged to this? Crevo_list is a little relevant, but not really.
5 posted on 02/14/2002 12:39:07 PM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Here's the judge's ruling. It's a PDF file, & I don't know how to cut & paste text from it. But go down to Footnote 2, the lesson plans, & ask yourself if religious indoctrination isn't being commingled with public school education in this class.
6 posted on 02/14/2002 12:49:43 PM PST by jennyp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: jennyp
Bump.
7 posted on 02/14/2002 4:04:35 PM PST by PatrickHenry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson