Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

2 arrested at airport had top clearance
Seattle Times ^ | February 6, 2002 | Steve Miletich

Posted on 02/06/2002 12:08:30 AM PST by sarcasm

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last
N'Goran would be allowed to seek asylum in the United States on the grounds he faces persecution in his homeland, Salazar said.

Yep, this administration is really serious about cracking down on visa violators.

1 posted on 02/06/2002 12:08:31 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Joe Hadenuf; doug from upland; dandelion; SocialMeltdown; Mercuria; cribsheet; dennisw,FITZ...
ping
2 posted on 02/06/2002 12:10:10 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
It never ends!!
3 posted on 02/06/2002 12:28:15 AM PST by timestax
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Un freakin' believable. This kinda crap just gives Osama and the boys something to chuckle about.

It's good, though, we are moving in the right direction.

4 posted on 02/06/2002 12:29:31 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
Exactly how are we moving in the right direction? I don't see that the administration is imposing any penalty on visa violators.
5 posted on 02/06/2002 12:36:07 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Well, I'm guessing, but for 9-11, these clowns would still be on the ramp slinging bags or whatever.
6 posted on 02/06/2002 12:46:23 AM PST by leadpenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: leadpenny
As far as I know, there has only been a crackdown at two airports, Salt Lake City and Seattle-Tacoma, this is hardly the strategy needed in a war on terrorism.
7 posted on 02/06/2002 12:52:08 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

Comment #8 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm; *TerrOrWar; *immigrant_list
All three cases represent the first time in his 27 years of practice in Seattle that federal prosecutors in Western Washington have invoked a statute requiring aliens to register with the INS within 30 days, Salazar said.

Twenty-seven years of ignoring the law. Why should I obey them?

9 posted on 02/06/2002 1:11:10 AM PST by Lion's Cub
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles A Lindbergh
HERE HERE ! 100% right ! Bush MUST make illegal immigration TOP priority . Why hasn't he already ? It's time to deport ALL illegals forthwith ! This should be normal operating procedure ( and not just a reaction to 9/11 ) . It's not too late !
10 posted on 02/06/2002 1:12:09 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Charles A Lindbergh; sushiman;
Bush still wants an amnesty for illegals:

U.S., Mexico move forward on push for immigration accord Presidents will meet on issue next month

By Karen Branch-Brioso

The St. Louis Post-Dispatch, February 4, 2002

WASHINGTON -- Once-stalled talks on a U.S.-Mexico guest-worker accord gained significant momentum last week with a White House announcement that the nations' presidents will discuss the issue on March 22 - and public assurances from the immigration chief.

"Some people believe that our talks with Mexico have died in the wake of Sept. 11. I assure you that this is not the case," Immigration and Naturalization Service Commissioner James Ziglar told a crowd of immigration advocates and lawyers gathered Friday at a Washington forum. "We should move forward - not because it's in Mexico's interest, but because it's in the United States' interest. These workers are important to the U.S. economy." The terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, carried out by foreign visitors, put temporary brakes on President George W. Bush's vow to bring "normalization" for some of the millions of undocumented Mexican workers in the United States. But the talks returned among mid-level administration officials Nov. 20, right after a three-day visit to Mexico by House Minority Leader Richard Gephardt, D-Mo., and Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle, D-S.D.

Although it hasn't publicly set a deadline, the administration appears on track to produce an agreement this year. With intensively competitive elections this fall that could shift control of the House and Senate to either party, the issue has implications far beyond the economic. The significant growth in the Latino vote may prove decisive. Such immigration pacts - long associated with Democrats - have found a Republican ally in a president who hails from a border state.

"Bottom line, it's become a major battleground between the two parties," said Sergio Bendixen, a consultant and pollster who specializes in the Hispanic market. If the 2001 elections showed anything, he said, it is that "the Hispanic electorate has become one of the major battlegrounds in American politics."

Mayoral elections in Houston, New York and Los Angeles showed the "fluidity" of the Hispanic vote, Bendixen said, with large blocs voting for conservative mayoral candidates in New York and Houston and liberals in L.A.: "Immigration has proven to be the baseline issue for Hispanic voters. Immigration for Hispanics is what civil rights is to blacks."

But the post-Sept. 11 strategy is distinct. Before Bush travels to Monterrey, Mexico, to meet with Mexican President Vicente Fox, Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge will go to Mexico City to establish border security. Ziglar, who participated in the latest round of U.S.-Mexico talks Wednesday in Washington, said the law-enforcement accord will go hand-in-hand with an immigration pact.

"If we could find a way to move a substantial portion of the current illegal flow from Mexico into legal channels via some kind of temporary-worker program and combine that with a new cooperative law enforcement arrangements with Mexico, we could benefit the U.S. economy, we could substantially reduce illegal immigration," Ziglar said. "And, it could enable the Border Patrol and other law enforcement agencies to focus on the bad guys coming across - not on the flow of people who just want to get into this country to work."

Democrats, too, have continued the call. In a Democratic response tailored to Hispanic media, Gephardt answered Bush's Saturday radio address with a call "to bring justice to our immigration laws - to reward those families who work hard, pay taxes, and contribute to our economy and our culture."

Despite the efforts by both parties, plans for the accord will hit some resistance by longtime proponents of immigration curbs who have been emboldened in the post-Sept. 11 atmosphere. The Congressional Immigration Reform Caucus, led by Rep. Tom Tancredo, R-Colo., has grown to 50 members from a pre-Sept. 11 membership of 15. Among the new members are Rep. Todd Akin, R-Town and Country, and Rep. David Phelps, D-Eldorado.

Offering amnesty to workers employed illegally in the United States will be a central sticking point on either side of the aisle, according to Steven Camarota, research director for the Center for Immigration Studies, which favors stricter immigration controls.

"If it's a straight guest-worker problem, the Democrats are going to balk, and if you bring in the green cards (that provide legal access for non-citizens to work anywhere), the Republicans will balk," said Camarota, who believes a guest-worker program would only serve to lower wages for all unskilled workers - U.S. citizens or no. "The bottom line here is Mexican immigration generally makes poor people poorer without creating significant economic benefits."

Also at issue will be whether to extend any guest-worker program to other undocumented workers, something Ziglar did not address. Working with Mexico, the source for an estimated 3.9 million of the 8.7 million undocumented immigrants living in the United States, is clearly his focus.

"We need to bring those folks into the light," Ziglar said, "to give them a status that makes sense."

11 posted on 02/06/2002 1:26:17 AM PST by sarcasm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

Comment #12 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
All three cases represent the first time in his 27 years of practice in Seattle that federal prosecutors in Western Washington have invoked a statute requiring aliens to register with the INS within 30 days, Salazar said.

Any and all pension monies for all Fed prosecutors during that time should be seized immediately. Some other punishments should be levied too, perhaps sharing a jail cell with the illegals for about 30 years...JFK

13 posted on 02/06/2002 1:31:28 AM PST by BADROTOFINGER
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #14 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
This is why the Congress was correct to require that airport screeners be American citizens. This is also why the ACLU is a menace to America for filing suit claiming discrimination, and trying to keep the aliens working at the airports.

Congressman Billybob

Billybob just finished his half hour: Phil is still on the air.

15 posted on 02/06/2002 2:53:24 AM PST by Congressman Billybob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #16 Removed by Moderator

To: sarcasm
Thanks for posting this. Good grief! What does it take to get these people who have "over stayed" their visa's to be rounded up and sent packing?????
17 posted on 02/06/2002 3:10:28 AM PST by kassie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sushiman
I hate to say it, but it's almost as if this administration is delaying action, waiting for the next attack. It makes absolutely no sense at all to not make immediate, major changes in our policy. What the hell is Bush waiting for?
18 posted on 02/06/2002 3:12:19 AM PST by airborne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: airborne
appears that the republicans - having pretty much written off the black vote - are courting the hispanic vote with talk of amnesty , etc. for illegals from latin america . if this is indeed the case the repubs are no better than the whores on the left and will do anything to insure their survival .
19 posted on 02/06/2002 3:25:36 AM PST by sushiman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: sarcasm
Ortiz-Alvarez has agreed to voluntarily leave the country within four months

Yeah, sure he will be gone but disappear in the US again!!!
20 posted on 02/06/2002 3:32:27 AM PST by LynnHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-51 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson