Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Shoulder to shoulder, Blair and Bush nominated for peace prize
Guardian/UK ^ | 2/05/02 | Stuart Millar

Posted on 02/04/2002 11:27:24 PM PST by kattracks

One has ordered his forces into battle more times than any other postwar British leader. The other threatens military action against "evil" nations and keeps a scorecard of dead al-Qaida leaders, marking each fatality with an X.

Now, Tony Blair and George Bush have received international recognition for their unswerving willingness to use force: a nomination for the 2002 Nobel peace prize.

The prime minister and US president have been jointly nominated for the accolade by a rightwing Norwegian politician who believes their military campaign against terrorism meets Alfred Nobel's criteria that the winner "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses".

Harald Tom Nesvik, who represents the Party of Progress in the Norwegian parliament, said yesterday: "The background for my nomination is their decisive action against terrorism, something I believe in the future will be the greatest threat to peace. Unfortunately, sometimes you have to use force to secure peace."

Mr Nesvik has nomination rights as a member of a national legislature.

The committee keeps the names of nominees secret for 50 years, but those making nominations often make their choice public. The full list of nominees will not be completed until later this month.

There are signs that Mr Blair and Mr Bush are up against tough competition to secure the $940,000 (£670,000) prize money and see their names added to an elite list which includes Martin Luther King, Mother Teresa and Nelson Mandela.

Other unconfirmed September 11-related nominations are believed to include Rudolph Giuliani, the former mayor of New York, and Guy Tozzoli, an engineer who helped design the World Trade Centre.

The winner will be announced in October.

Mr Blair's nomination appears to have brought little cheer to Downing Street. Last night a No 10 spokeswoman said: "I think it would be a matter for the committee to consider any nomination. I don't think it would be a matter we would comment on."


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last
To: kattracks
Oh my GOD! Clinton will be throwing a FIT!! If this is a joke, it's a good one. I cannot see Bush getting a peace prize, but you never know about these people.
21 posted on 02/05/2002 12:09:57 AM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
That would be a hoot. Clinton would just die! His legacy would be shot to he--. Still, it is the Nobel. If Bush were to win it would almost be a negative statement of sorts. But can you imagine the look on Clinton. Heck, if Buddy weren't already dead I'd fear for the poor pooch.
22 posted on 02/05/2002 12:10:46 AM PST by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
You're welcome! I remember that Slick tried to buy the nomination--or was it the prize? Anyway, HAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHHA! ;-D
23 posted on 02/05/2002 12:11:12 AM PST by Judith Anne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
"clintons lobbied for prize"

You don't suppose that tipped the scale in favor of Bush do you? I guess we'll never know what motivated them to choose Bush.

24 posted on 02/05/2002 12:13:58 AM PST by CyberAnt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
meets Alfred Nobel's criteria that the winner "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies

What the...? I suppose that would be an indication of an individual worthy of a prize in some addle-brained Utopian's world, but that sounds like pure lunacy to me. People have been beating the crap out of each other since there were more than two of us. It ain't about to get better because some elites award a prize to a person or a pair.

How can a group of people be so deluded into thinking that all will be swell if we can just get the people to give each other hugs?

25 posted on 02/05/2002 12:19:00 AM PST by cincinnati_Steve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Harald Tom Nesvik, who represents the Party of Progress in the Norwegian parliament, said yesterday: "The background for my nomination is their decisive action against terrorism, something I believe in the future will be the greatest threat to peace. Unfortunately, sometimes you have to use force to secure peace."

So, by his reasoning, George Patton should've won the Nobel prize in 1944. At last . . . a European who gets it!

26 posted on 02/05/2002 12:20:56 AM PST by Rubber Duckie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Rubber Duckie
LOL. Reminds me of the statement Clinton made to the effect of: "We had to bomb Serbia to obtain peace..."
27 posted on 02/05/2002 12:23:21 AM PST by Demidog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
Thanks, Doghty ! I am so glad that YOU and others ( except for Demi ... sheeeeeeeeeeeesh ! ) get the joke. I think that almost all FREEPERS could have a field day ( should President Bush win this ) with a " Caption This " thread of Slick's face. It would be such a hoot ! : - )
28 posted on 02/05/2002 12:50:16 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: CyberAnt
Who knows ?

Still, it IS delicious , to imagine what the Clintons are thinking about this. They must have been told. ROTFLOL

29 posted on 02/05/2002 12:52:50 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Demidog
Ignorant troll
30 posted on 02/05/2002 1:02:52 AM PST by ElephantMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
The morning of Sept. 11, naturally, I was on FR. A thread popped up about a plane hitting the world trade center and I was in shock. Pictures were posted almost immediately. I found an old television at my office, fiddled with the rabbit ears, and saw live the plane hitting the second tower. My shock had turned to panic. I was scared and sick considering the reports that 50,000 people worked in the twin towers. (One perceptive poster even speculated that this was Bid Laden's doing.)

When President Bush made his first statement, I thanked God that Al Gore was not at the helm, that we were being led by a strong man, a christian man. The President's speech on the 20th brought me assurances that this terror would be dealt with decisively and with dogged determination. My panic was replaced an inner peace thanks to our great President - he gets my peace prize.

God Bless President Bush.

31 posted on 02/05/2002 1:12:09 AM PST by Quilla
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
nopardons That would be a hoot. Clinton would just die! His legacy would be shot to he--. Still, it is the Nobel. If Bush were to win it would almost be a negative statement of sorts. But can you imagine the look on Clinton. Heck, if Buddy weren't already dead I'd fear for the poor pooch.

You two are very naughty!

And I really like that aspect of you both! -- <]:^)~< -- B

32 posted on 02/05/2002 1:17:22 AM PST by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: kattracks; Snow Bunny; Alamo-Girl; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; onyx; SusanUSA...
Shoulder to shoulder, Blair and Bush nominated for peace prize

Excerpt:

One has ordered his forces into battle more times than any other postwar British leader. The other threatens military action against "evil" nations and keeps a scorecard of dead al-Qaida leaders, marking each fatality with an X.

Now, Tony Blair and George Bush have received international recognition for their unswerving willingness to use force: a nomination for the 2002 Nobel peace prize.

The prime minister and US president have been jointly nominated for the accolade by a rightwing Norwegian politician who believes their military campaign against terrorism meets Alfred Nobel's criteria that the winner "shall have done the most or the best work for fraternity between nations, for the abolition or reduction of standing armies and for the holding and promotion of peace congresses".

Harald Tom Nesvik, who represents the Party of Progress in the Norwegian parliament, said yesterday: "The background for my nomination is their decisive action against terrorism, something I believe in the future will be the greatest threat to peace. Unfortunately, sometimes you have to use force to secure peace."


Excellent news and well deserved by both, IMHO!
(((PING))))))
Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my ping list!. . .don't be shy.
33 posted on 02/05/2002 1:24:48 AM PST by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Thank you ! Most of us feel the same way. Ask those of us, who actually lost family and / or friends how we feel ; you'll get a a thumbs up , from us.
34 posted on 02/05/2002 1:27:45 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Brian Allen
Hi Brian , and thanks .... :-)
35 posted on 02/05/2002 1:28:57 AM PST by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: kattracks

Hurl-lery is overjoyed at the news!

36 posted on 02/05/2002 1:51:25 AM PST by Caipirabob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
What did Blair do?

Oh...I get it. He's in there so Bush can win.

37 posted on 02/05/2002 1:51:31 AM PST by The Raven
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
"Peace through strength" award or what? Thats odd these days.
38 posted on 02/05/2002 2:05:55 AM PST by Ymani Cricket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Boy, I'll bet Klintoon is smacking himself 'long side the head! Why didn't he think of that? Instead of desparately trying to get a Nobel Peace prize for himself by bringing Israel and the Palestinians to the peace table, he could have gone into Afghanistan and kicked some ass!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!


lest we forget

THE CULPABILITY OF WILLIAM JEFFERSON CLINTON

39 posted on 02/05/2002 2:14:42 AM PST by Shenandoah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Quilla
Somebody won't be happy to hear about this...


40 posted on 02/05/2002 2:20:29 AM PST by gratefulwharffratt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-122 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson