Skip to comments.
Why Conservatives Should Reject Libertarianism
National Review
| Ernest van den Haag
Posted on 02/01/2002 12:30:35 PM PST by Exnihilo
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
1
posted on
02/01/2002 12:30:35 PM PST
by
Exnihilo
To: Exnihilo
INCOMING!!!!!
2
posted on
02/01/2002 12:35:54 PM PST
by
Hacksaw
To: Exnihilo
Convinced that there is by far too much government activity (taxing, subsidizing, licencing, and regulating), they [Conservatives] would greatly reduce it. This is news to me as I have lived through a (great) Conservative President and a Conservative Congress and Senate that never did this.
3
posted on
02/01/2002 12:40:38 PM PST
by
JohnGalt
To: Exnihilo
Did one of those nasty libertarians run over your dog, little boy?
4
posted on
02/01/2002 12:48:44 PM PST
by
laotzu
To: laotzu
I'm in my twenties and I don't own a dog, but thanks for your obviously heart-felt concern.
5
posted on
02/01/2002 12:49:59 PM PST
by
Exnihilo
To: Exnihilo
Why Conservatives Should Reject Libertarianism Cuz they aren't socialistic enough to be cultural conservatives.
6
posted on
02/01/2002 12:55:27 PM PST
by
jlogajan
To: JohnGalt
Surely you jest. We havn't seen a conservative in our lifetime.(I'm 42) Surely you meant Republican, Republican, and Republican.
7
posted on
02/01/2002 12:55:48 PM PST
by
Ragin1
To: Exnihilo
Libertarians oppose all taxes and all public services (not always the services, but always their public, legal, and tax-paid character). Libertarians favor activities only when volunteered or privately coerced. 1 Libertarians oppose public courts, laws, police, armies, roads, parks, education, health. They want no government whatsoeverI could write a rebuttal based on facts (L/libertarians want a CONSTITUTIONAL government, no ZERO government) but to get to your level and that of the author so that you can understand what I'm saying, here goes:
Do not do not do not, infinity
Liar, liar pants on fire.
I have not interest in discussing an article in which the author has not done his homework and/or has no regard for facts and truth.
8
posted on
02/01/2002 12:57:04 PM PST
by
Eagle Eye
To: Exnihilo
Libertarians oppose public courts, laws, police, armies, roads, parks, education, health.
I'm a conservative...but the author of this article is a moron!
To: Exnihilo
Isn't Van Den Haag dead?
10
posted on
02/01/2002 12:57:50 PM PST
by
Clemenza
To: Exnihilo
The one thing about the current Republican party: THEY ARE NOT DELIVERING!!!
Here in Texas our genius Republican Govenor just proposed a $200Billion state funded high-speed rail system. I guess he doesn't read the papers about Amtrack. Perhaps he can't read...??hmmm...
To: Exnihilo
I'm in my twenties That explains a lot.
As you seem to have substituted posting Libertarian bashing articles for self sustaining employment, perhaps you can cite the evidence for even one of the author's assertions about Libertarians. That someone manages to get their babbling claptrap published, doesn't mean it has any basis in fact - as evidenced by this torrent of misrepresentations and false conclusions.
12
posted on
02/01/2002 1:01:46 PM PST
by
another1
To: Exnihilo
Libertarians oppose all taxes and all public services (not always the services, but always their public, legal, and tax-paid character). Libertarians favor activities only when volunteered or privately coerced. 1 Libertarians oppose public courts, laws, police, armies, roads, parks, education, health. They want no government whatsoever. With these sentences, the author conclusively demonstrates:
1. He knows nothing about what Libertarians favor.
2. He's too lazy to find out before he writes at length about a political movement he is ignorant of
and
3. He's therefore a moron, with no credibility.
To: Hank Rearden
Are your sure Libertarian don't oppose health? /sarcasm ;)
To: Exnihilo
"Did one of those nasty libertarians run over your dog, little boy?"
I'm in my twenties and I don't own a dog"
Wow!! So I was correct!
Also; as a conservative, I am heartless(or haven't you heard?).
15
posted on
02/01/2002 1:03:48 PM PST
by
laotzu
To: Clemenza
"Isn't Van Den Haag dead?"
Perhaps he's merely brain dead.
To: Exnihilo
If Dubya gets his wish, in 2 years, Dubya will have increased government spending 14%.
Having said that, is anyone here seriously going to call Dubya a 'conservative'? By the definitions in the article, Dubya is most certainly NOT a conservative.
If Dubya continues on this trend, and manages to get re-elected, we can expect government to be 56% bigger after his 8 years in office. There's your 'conservative' for you.
17
posted on
02/01/2002 1:06:34 PM PST
by
zoyd
To: Hacksaw
LOL!
To: Exnihilo
Another article that lies about what libertarians believe.
19
posted on
02/01/2002 1:08:30 PM PST
by
js1138
To: Exnihilo
Seriously, this idiot has no idea what he's talking about.
It's like listening to the drunk chick at the end of the bar pontificating about football.
20
posted on
02/01/2002 1:09:02 PM PST
by
dead
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-94 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson