Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: aculeus
Question unaddressed in this article (and in Biology literature) why didn't they evolve in 500 million years?
Because they didn't need to. They survived just fine without changing. Evolution is not about going from simple to complex or from "worse" to "better". It is about surviving in your enviroment long enough to reproduce.
4 posted on 01/29/2002 4:29:15 PM PST by mykej
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: mykej
Question unaddressed in this article (and in Biology literature) why didn't they evolve in 500 million years?

Because they didn't need to. They survived just fine without changing. Evolution is not about going from simple to complex or from "worse" to "better". It is about surviving in your enviroment long enough to reproduce

You're confusing survival with evolution. Evolution means change. 500 million years ago our ancestors were bony fish swimming in the same environment as the jellyfish. Supposedly the jellyfish and the vertebrate fish had access to the same evolutionary mechanisms. Yet some fish became amphibians, reptiles, birds and mammals while the jellyfish remained jellyfish.

There is a mechanistic answer to this ignored question which has been pubished in a peer-reviewed journal and you'll find it here LINK

8 posted on 01/29/2002 5:54:07 PM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson