GO PATS!
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: paul in cape
My newspaper speculated on the outcome of the playoffs (beforehand of course) - and they've hit it dead on so far. They picked St Louis in the SB - by a big time score difference. Reason? They have too many good players.
To: paul in cape
And, after the last two games, one has to think
God's on their side!!!
40 posted on
01/28/2002 3:24:03 AM PST by
grania
To: paul in cape
Hey, is Michael Bishop still with the Patriots? He was a quarterback at Kansas State a few years back and went to the Pats in a later round. He was never intended, I believe, to be used at q'back, but was such an awesome athlete that they spoke of using him elsewhere.
Anyone know.
I watched him throw a football 70 yards once, perfect spiral, from a flat-footed stand....all arm strength. Fast and slick -- unfortunately not an NFL style q'back. He was a scrambler, option, runner. But he had this desire to win that wouldn't quit; would always figure out a way.
41 posted on
01/28/2002 3:25:45 AM PST by
xzins
To: paul in cape
Sorry--but it will be another freakin BLOWOUT!
After 8 1/2 hours of hype--the Superbowl game will be all but over in 15 minutes, and the people at the parties will start discussing how the commercials last year were so much better.
RAMS 52........................PATS 17
42 posted on
01/28/2002 3:26:15 AM PST by
SkyPilot
To: paul in cape
On the record:
Pats 27
Rams 24
In OT.
I have spoken...
46 posted on
01/28/2002 4:10:37 AM PST by
metesky
To: paul in cape
Also, IMHO, first time Pats have been there with a real coach.
And by now, after '86, '96, the Pats should know the field pretty well. 8^)
47 posted on
01/28/2002 4:13:51 AM PST by
metesky
To: paul in cape
On the battlefield and the playing field, one wins by neutralizing one's opponents strengths and exploiting each and every opportunity.
Does this sound like the Pats?
To: paul in cape
Because their fans are good spellers?
To: paul in cape
this is a political discussion?
To: paul in cape
This will be another in a long line of boring Superbowls. The Pats shot their wads beating the Steelers. When they face the Rams they will be
spanked badly by a very superior team. Count on it!
GO RAMS!
To: paul in cape
The key to the game will be the Patriots ability to maintain some form of a ball control offense and keep time of possession relatively even. If they do they will keep it close.
If they don't their defense will tire (like it did against Pittsburgh) and the Rams will pull away in the fourth quarter. Kurt Warner's not going to melt down like Kordelia did.
-Eric
60 posted on
01/28/2002 4:55:47 AM PST by
E Rocc
To: paul in cape
Seven interceptions and three fumble recoveries in the last two games. That's why a week from today New England will be 0-3 in the Big Dance.
To: paul in cape
#1-10. Kordell Stewart is the most useless QB the Steelers have had since Cliff Stout.
To: paul in cape
I think the RAMS will win it.
To: paul in cape
Goooooooooooooooooooo Raiders!
To: paul in cape
GO BRONCOS!!! ;)
80 posted on
01/28/2002 5:59:06 AM PST by
BluH2o
To: paul in cape
I can't believe the Pats are IN IT. It has often seemed down through the years that the Redsox curse somehow wafted out to envelope Foxboro.
I'm rooting for the Pats. Miracles do happen.
81 posted on
01/28/2002 6:00:15 AM PST by
Wm Bach
To: paul in cape
The Pats looked impressive. They need to shut down the Rams running attack and I think they have a possibility of winning.
82 posted on
01/28/2002 6:02:27 AM PST by
1Old Pro
To: paul in cape
Three reasons the Rams will win.
1) Kurt Warner
2) Marshall Faulk
3) Aeneas Williams
To: paul in cape
Did Jerome Bettis play yesterday? I couldn't watch but I heard he was out.
Pittsburg without Bettis is half a team.
84 posted on
01/28/2002 6:06:22 AM PST by
js1138
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson