Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

JUDICIAL WATCH UNCOVERS 1.8 MILLION CLINTON WHITE HOUSE E-MAIL
Judicial Watch e-mail ^ | January 17, 2002 | JW

Posted on 01/17/2002 10:38:33 AM PST by litany_of_lies

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last
To: Eroteme; aristeides; YaYa123; Plummz; Angelwood
FYI
21 posted on 01/17/2002 11:35:47 AM PST by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NittanyLion
They have been working on this a long time
Judicial Watch, which is prosecuting the Filegate $90 million class action lawsuit on behalf of those whose FBI files were misused by the Clinton White House, first exposed the e-mail scandal in early 2000 through its client Sheryl Hall, a former top computer official at the Clinton White House, who testified that incriminating e-mail concerning virtually all the Clinton-Gore scandals had never been produced as they should have in response to document requests and subpoenas. Another Judicial Watch client, former White House computer contractor Betty Lambuth, also testified (along with others) that high-level White House officials threatened Northrop Grumman White House computer contractors to keep quiet about the hidden e-mail or face jail and firing. These threats occurred in the middle of the Lewinsky scandal. The scandal was the subject of a months long evidentiary hearing that included the testimony of the late Charles Ruff, John Podesta, and Cheryl Mills. The court is in now considering whether to commence criminal contempt proceedings. A decision is expected soon.
Press Release
22 posted on 01/17/2002 11:39:03 AM PST by LynnHam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies

Finally, nice job Larry!

23 posted on 01/17/2002 11:41:10 AM PST by Southack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
The e-mail, which is in the custody of the National Archives, must now be searched pursuant to court orders.

My experience with JW (and I've made contributions in the past ... not recently) they always seem to come up empty. They may have something here, but I'm not optimistic ... we'll see. If nothing else it may give the Clintonistas a few sleepless nights.

24 posted on 01/17/2002 11:44:29 AM PST by BluH2o
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
Excuse me. Shouldn't that statement be addressed to Ashcroft? Remember ... Klayman can only file CIVIL suits.

I know, that's why I said get one started instead of prosecute one. If Klayman ever turned up enough criminal evidence to force a prosecution of Clinton I would be thrilled. The problem is he is always opening new doors before completing the tasks he started.

25 posted on 01/17/2002 12:01:11 PM PST by mlo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: gulfcoast6
Wish I could disagree with you..........*sigh*
26 posted on 01/17/2002 12:15:37 PM PST by BARLF
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: ChaseR
More hope.
27 posted on 01/17/2002 12:27:39 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
Any from Monica to Slick?
28 posted on 01/17/2002 12:29:11 PM PST by RetiredArmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
We need a law that says all government officials, all LEO's and all politicians must follow the law. Think that would help em any? :-)
29 posted on 01/17/2002 12:30:27 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: BeAChooser
Sad but you are 100% correct. This "two-party Cartel" has NO intentions of disrupying it's fiefdom that it has created. You see they only argue in Congress about how & what amount they will STEAL OF YOUR MONEY.
30 posted on 01/17/2002 12:30:32 PM PST by Digger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
I've yet to see results or conclusion to anything by Klayman. If it ever happens I will start the Yippee. Until then it's just more bla bla.
31 posted on 01/17/2002 12:32:16 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mercuria
A *bit* of fodder for the cannon, Merc. ;^)

...some good news is never too late 'round here.

32 posted on 01/17/2002 12:32:54 PM PST by Landru
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
Fourth and long, .... Klayman backpedals, ....he's under pressure and scrambling, it's a long pass and its ..........CAUGHT ON THE 5 YARD LINE! That Klayman just can't miss!
33 posted on 01/17/2002 12:36:11 PM PST by USC-Varsity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LynnHam
Sheryl Hall, a former top computer official at the Clinton White House, who testified that incriminating e-mail concerning virtually all the Clinton-Gore scandals had never been produced as they should have in response to document requests and subpoenas.

I don't expect much to come of it. Klayman once again overstates the evidence, at least that's what I gather after having gone through nearly all the documents on the Filegate case on the JW website some time ago. For one thing, Hall never testified that "incriminating email...had never been produced." That's just Klayman's spin. Hall testified that she heard Clinton staffers say in her presence that their intention was to stall responses as long as possible; she also swore, IIRC, that email and voicemail were not properly backed-up and thus, large chunks of email data were never searched in response to various subpoenas. Larry has hopes that there is incriminating evidence, but he really has no idea. The data will be searched, but under the law, as I understand it, only responsive documents can be produced.

He may get contempt of court against Podesta, et al., but that, too, could be less than likey. By the time anything comes of this, Larry'll be trying to get on the news deposing Osama bin Laden and Castro. There seems to be no current event that Larry will not try to attach his name to.

Cheers.

34 posted on 01/17/2002 12:38:29 PM PST by ssterns
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
good, now he can leave our President alone....
35 posted on 01/17/2002 12:41:00 PM PST by The Wizard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: USC-Varsity
CAUGHT ON THE 5 YARD LINE!

Unfortunately, he NEVER gets across the goal line. And all the razzle-dazzle hoopla doesn't mean diddly without a SCORE !

36 posted on 01/17/2002 12:43:16 PM PST by jimt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: litany_of_lies
I FOUND IT! I FOUND IT!

It's right there in the Constitution. BilHillarygore are exempt from the laws of the land because they formed the "most ethical administration in US History"

NOT! Go Klayman Go!

37 posted on 01/17/2002 12:43:18 PM PST by Young Werther
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Landru
So true true true, Landru...

BOOM!!!

38 posted on 01/17/2002 12:44:56 PM PST by Mercuria
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: jimt
There's only 30 seconds left and the team's only down by 2.
39 posted on 01/17/2002 12:45:23 PM PST by USC-Varsity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Young Werther
LOL Good one
40 posted on 01/17/2002 12:48:55 PM PST by Native American Female Vet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-143 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson