Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: VinnyTex
How cute! The WSJ attempts to avoid the racism charge by getting a black to write the article.
5 posted on 01/07/2002 9:04:08 PM PST by atafak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: atafak
The WSJ attempts to avoid the racism charge

Are you suggesting the Wall Street Journal is racist?

7 posted on 01/07/2002 9:11:26 PM PST by VinnyTex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: atafak
How do you get a black to do that? That is a rediculous statement atafak.
9 posted on 01/07/2002 9:21:23 PM PST by A CA Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: atafak
WHADDAYANUTZ??????????????????????????????????

WSJ isn't allowed to publish articles by blacks???????????????????????????????????????????????????

GO AWAY.,,,please.

17 posted on 01/08/2002 6:46:17 AM PST by Neets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: atafak; okie01
"...The WSJ attempts to avoid the racism charge by getting a black to write the article."

How embarrassing for you. How do you hope to have your opinions viewed as credible when you attack the messenger rather than the message?

What is the subject of (assertions made in) the article? It is: "White guilt = black power".

Maybe you think that those who read and post on this Free Republic forum are unable to have the courage to engage in critical thought.

If you want to enjoy credibility with any, other than feminized, emotion-driven males and air-head females, you will have to legitimately refute the assertions made in "the message" rather than disengenuously attempt to judge the motives of "the messenger" and the paper for which he writes.

Comments such as the one you made are just another example of how the legalistic, religious left (modern-day Pharisees) always expose themselves as the quintessential examples of intolerance and judgementalism. Unless others "convert" to their politically correct views, and speak and act as they "should" they are "bad people".

Now, if you want to make an attempt to legitimately refute the assertions that Shelby Steele makes, please do so. If all you can do is engage in personal attacks, you won't be taken seriously by intellectually honest people.

59 posted on 01/09/2002 10:00:21 AM PST by Matchett-PI
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson