[RadioAstronomer]

Very nice non-answer. Thank you.

It is very much an answer. The onus is on you to present ID to the scientific community, not the other way around.

[Exnihilo]

I see! So the definition of 'scientific' is "anything that has been submitted to peer reviewed journals, and published", right? Gee. Has any explaination of mutations and natural selection as original information creating mechanisms been submitted to a peer reviewed journal? No? Gosh, not scientific!! For shame! And what of naturalism? Science itself presupposes naturalism (as it well should). Has any paper been submitted to a peer reviewed journal attempting to empirically verify said naturalism as it applies to the origin of biological information? No? Gosh, again, unscientific! Naughty boy!

[keithtoo]

Darwinian Social Promotion? Don't Monkey with Truth you Evo-Doers