Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Exnihilo
It's up to you to present the theory with evidence. The burden of proof rests with the affirmative side. Please post the evidence. You might start with an example of something that is not-designed compared to something that is designed.
128 posted on 01/07/2002 7:14:42 PM PST by Doctor Stochastic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: Doctor Stochastic
",i>It's up to you to present the theory with evidence.

It is up to evolutionists to prove that their theory is true, not for others to prove it untrue. Intelligent design is a criticism of evolution. Evolutionists have never been able to show that either their theory is true or that the criticism of intelligent design - that nothing as complex as a living being can be created at random - is untrue. The idiot Dawkings trying to disprove the undisprovable goes into such idiocies as saying that mountains with some features that can be imagined as representing something man made are the same as Mt. Rushmore. The arguments of evolution against intelligent design criticism are totally idiotic. One writer for example asked if a hurricane going through a waste dump would create a Boeing 747. Obviously it would not. Neither would random forces create anything as complex as a human being or even a fly which is millions of times more complex than a 747.

136 posted on 01/07/2002 7:47:56 PM PST by gore3000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 128 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson