Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Planned Parenthood funding threatened [Why is it tax-funded to being with?]
The Herald Palladium (St. Joseph-Benton Harbor Michigan The Newspaper for Southwest Michigan) ^ | 1-5-2002 | LYNN STEVENS

Posted on 01/07/2002 9:36:18 AM PST by Notwithstanding

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last
To: Galatea
What is wrong with 'planning' one's life? Nothing, as long as planned serial killing to alleviate the new lifetime already begun in thew womb from behavior is not touted as a 'reproductive' action. Abortion kills a new individual who's lifetime has already started. Dress up human behavior any way you wish, but to terminate a pregnancy is to kill another individual human life. The key is the lack of individual responsibility for one's actions and the dramatic decline in personal integrity America suffers from.
101 posted on 01/10/2002 4:44:45 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: hocndoc;Tribune7; GenXFreedomFighter; toenail; Cicero; Wolfie; IM2Phat4U; Surge-on...
A pregnant woman who is murdered can result in the murderer being charged with two deaths?

Is this true???

102 posted on 01/10/2002 4:49:15 PM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Here's an article about holding the killer responsible for both lives: http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/fr/605621/posts
103 posted on 01/10/2002 8:16:49 PM PST by hocndoc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: madg
What is healthy about encouraging young people to use condoms when they don't protect against all pregnancies never mind STD's?
104 posted on 01/10/2002 9:46:51 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
It depends on which state you live in.
105 posted on 01/10/2002 9:48:05 PM PST by victim soul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood; Brads Gramma; JMJ333; hocndoc; Caleb1411; toenail; patent; Proud2bRC...
Is this true??? 102 posted by Sir Francis Dashwood As one would expect in a world gone PC crazy, it is a case-by-case judgement call for the legal system in many states. But give NARAL and the other death cultists a little time to wend their way through a few trumped up cases and it will be a forgotten protection for the endangered little ones.

Serial killing is becoming institutionalized as enlightened social policy for a godless world ... in America of the twenty-first century, don'tcha know!

When all is said and done, the serial killing of tens-of-millions of American preborn individual living beings is the 'nature' (as in humanist) extension of the denial of God and the eternal human soul; if it's not really an eternal being in that woman's womb, and the woman isn't an eternal being, killing the preborn of any species is just 'selection'. [Personally, I believe human's do have an eternal soul, and that soul God begins to knit to the spacetime body from conception onward. Yes, abortion on demand is a very troubling phenomenon, to me, for my nation's ill health, of the collective souls surviving this current holocaust.]

106 posted on 01/10/2002 10:40:46 PM PST by MHGinTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN; Tribune7; GenXFreedomFighter; toenail; Cicero; Wolfie; IM2Phat4U; Surge-on...
Another source of amazement is the concept of those who hold candlelight vigils for heinous murderers about to be executed, a large number of whom think it is acceptable to murder an unborn child without the benefit of a trial. Is the "right to life" of one responsible for much murder and mayhem more important than that of a truly innocent unborn child? Perhaps we should call capital punishment "post-natal abortion" and identify abortion as a "pre-natal death sentence" or "pre-natal summary execution."
107 posted on 01/11/2002 4:16:09 AM PST by Sir Francis Dashwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Another source of amazement is the concept of those who hold candlelight vigils for heinous murderers about to be executed, a large number of whom think it is acceptable to murder an unborn child without the benefit of a trial.

They are the same people who fall silent when schools teach Islam, yet shriek like banshees when the name 'Jesus' is mentioned; they are the same people who claim Christians are suppressors of freedom while they utilize the most totalitarian of tactics against their opponents; in short, they are those who call evil "good", and the "good" evil.

108 posted on 01/11/2002 4:48:19 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
Perhaps we should call capital punishment "post-natal abortion" and identify abortion as a "pre-natal death sentence" or "pre-natal summary execution."

Wow! Excellent post!

109 posted on 01/11/2002 5:43:10 AM PST by SpookBrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
Thanks for the ping, you warrior for life you. =)
110 posted on 01/11/2002 6:19:03 AM PST by JMJ333
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: toenail, Galatea
It would be more in keeping with the intention of the noblest man in the world if our two Christian churches, instead of annoying Negroes with missions with which they neither desire nor understand, would kindly, but in all seriousness, teach our European humanity that where parents are not healthy it is indeed pleasing to God to take pity on a poor little healthy orphan child and give him father and mother, than themselves to give birth to a sick child who will only bring unhappiness and suffering on himself and the rest of the world.

The folkish state must make up for what everyone else has neglected in this field. It must set race in the center of all life. It must take care to keep it pure. It must declare the child to be the most precious treasure of the people. It must see to it that only the healthy beget children; that there is only one disgrace: despite one's own sickness and deficiencies, to bring children into the world, and one highest honor: to renounce doing so. And conversely it must be considered reprehensible: to withhold healthy children from the nation. Here the state must act as the guardian of a millennial future in the face of which the wishes and the selfishness of the individual must appear as nothing and submit. It must put forth the most modern of medical means to do so. It must declare unfit for propagation all who are in any way visibly sick or have inherited a disease and can therefor pass it on, and put this into actual practice.

------Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

111 posted on 01/11/2002 8:45:23 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: toenail, Galatea
A Plan for Peace

MARGARET SANGER
(founder of Planned Parenthood)

Summary of address before the New Historical
Society, January 17th, New York City

First, put into action President Wilson's fourteen points, upon which terms Germany and Austria surrendered to the Allies in 1918.

Second, have Congress set up a special department for the study of population problems and appoint a Parliament of Population, the directors representing the various branches of science: this body to direct and control the population through birth rates and immigration, and to direct its distribution over the country according to national needs consistent with taste, fitness and interest of the individuals.

The main object of the Population Congress would be:

a. to raise the level and increase the intelligence of the population.

b. to increase the population slowly by keeping the birth rate at its present level of fifteen per thousand, decreasing the death rate below its present mark of 11 per thousand.

c. to keep the doors of immigration closed to the entrance of certain aliens whose condition is known to be detrimental to the stamina of the race, such as feebleminded, idiots, morons, insane, syphilitic, epileptic, criminal, professional prostitutes, and others in this class barred by the immigration laws of 1924.

d. to apply a stern and rigid policy of sterilization and segregation to that grade of population whose progeny is already tainted, or whose inheritance is such that objectionable traits may be transmitted to offspring.

e. to insure the country against future burdens of maintenance for numerous offspring as may be born of feebleminded parents, by pensioning all persons with transmissible disease who voluntarily consent to sterilization.

f. to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.

g. to apportion farm lands and homesteads for these segregated persons where they would be taught to work under competent instructors for the period of their entire lives.

112 posted on 01/11/2002 8:54:31 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: He Rides A White Horse
Planned Parenthood funding threatened [Why is it tax-funded to being with?]

Indeed. Why?

113 posted on 01/11/2002 8:59:07 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
f. to give certain dysgenic groups in our population their choice of segregation or sterilization.

"Choice"

114 posted on 01/11/2002 9:01:12 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Sir Francis Dashwood
.........teach our European humanity that where parents are not healthy it is indeed pleasing to God to take pity on a poor little healthy orphan child and give him father and mother, than themselves to give birth to a sick child who will only bring unhappiness and suffering on himself and the rest of the world.

How many times have we heard some variation of this theme from the pro-abortionists?

115 posted on 01/11/2002 9:06:38 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: madg
Like it or not, Planned Parenthood is a public health organization. That’s why they qualify for tax dollars.

(laughing)

116 posted on 01/11/2002 9:14:16 AM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Notwithstanding
LOOKING FOR INFO ON PP--

Does anyone know if a list of donors to this organization is available?

117 posted on 01/11/2002 9:15:43 AM PST by Mamzelle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mamzelle
http://www.stantoninus.net/listab.htm
118 posted on 01/11/2002 10:37:18 AM PST by Notwithstanding
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies]

Comment #119 Removed by Moderator

To: madg
Well, I've read ahead, and already know that this is just the beginning of your full-tilt, multi-part, marathon, ad hominem assault on me.

Read 111 and 112. You can act as dismissive as you want to, but even the most dim bulb can plainly see that these two people share a frighteningly similar ideology. You can't deny it.

120 posted on 01/11/2002 5:26:48 PM PST by He Rides A White Horse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-131 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson