Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Narcissism Squared: Bill's Never Ending Obsession with Himself
Common Conservative ^ | 01/01/02 | Heidi Parent

Posted on 01/01/2002 10:35:26 AM PST by Jean S

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last
To: Howlin
In Clinton's world, the only valid needs are those of Clinton - he's one classic narcissist.

Where, exactly, does Clinton say that is in their job description?

101 posted on 01/01/2002 5:56:39 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: soundsolutions
The Clinton negatives are high and getting higher. They would have to do some major cheating to win another election.

Oh, I think that it is you the underestimates the power of this man and the potential destruction he could still wreck upon this country. His wife is being touted as the next president; he is the number 1 fundraiser for the liberals. Do I have to spell it out any clearer?

102 posted on 01/01/2002 6:00:34 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: soundsolutions
Well said:

British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain responded the same way to the Nazis in 1930s Europe as President Clinton did to terrorists in 1990s America. As long as military intervention remained unpopular with the British citizens, Chamberlain was satisfied with letting Hitler do as he pleased. No military intervention, just big words ("I believe it is peace for our time." Once again, maybe if we say it enough, it will come true). But Chamberlain's failure to contain Hitler, even if it meant using military force, soon led to World War II and it was left to Winston Churchill to right Chamberlain's wrongs. Sixty years later, Bill Clinton's failure to contain bin Laden, even after repeated terrorists attacks on Americans here and abroad, allowed the attacks of September 11th to take place and now it is left to George W. Bush to act where Clinton did not.

103 posted on 01/01/2002 6:02:49 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Another interesting article....thanks, Liz!
104 posted on 01/01/2002 6:07:05 PM PST by summer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: 4Liberty
You're right. We must never forget.

Q: SO, YOU DON’T BELIEVE JUANITA BROADDRICK’S CLAIM?

Gore: NO; I DIDN’T SAY THAT. I said I don’t know how to evaluate that, and I didn’t see the interview. But I must say something else to you about this. Why don’t you just stand back up; I’d like to look you in the eye. I think that whatever MISTAKES [Bill Clinton] made in his personal life are in the minds of most Americans must be balanced against what he has done for his public life as president. My philosophy, since you asked about my religious faith, I’m taught in my religious tradition to hate the sin and love the sinner. I’m taught that ALL OF US ARE HEIR TO MISTAKES, that flesh is heir to. And I think that, in judging his performance as a president, I think that most people are anxious to stop talking about all the personal attacks against him. And trying to sort out all of the allegations, and want to, instead, MOVE ON, and focus on the future. Now, I’ll say this to you, he is my friend, and that friendship is important, and IF YOU’VE EVER HAD A FRIEND WHO HAS MADE A SERIOUS MISTAKE and then repaired the friendship and MOVED ON, then you know what that relationship has been like for me. Secondly, I felt the same disappointment and anger at him during the period when all this was going on that most people did. You may have felt a different kind of emotion, I don’t know. I sense that maybe you did. I certainly felt what most Americans did. Third, I have been involved in a lot of battles where he and I have fought together on behalf of the American people, and I think we’ve made a good, positive difference for this country. Number four, I’m running for president on my own. I want to take my own values of faith and family to the presidency, and I want you to evaluate me on the basis of who I am and what you believe I can do for this country as president. Thank you.

This conversation was reprinted in The Weekly Standard, Dec. 27, 1999, p. 2.

http://weeklystandard.com/

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Bottom line: Rape = mistake

105 posted on 01/01/2002 6:22:50 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
My faith, which is Christianity, teaches me that I should have nothing to do with a person that knowingly “practices” sin unless they repent (do an about face). It also teaches me that we are always forgiven for our transgressions from the Lord, but he will not take away the consequences. Clinton has neither repented nor adequately suffered the consequences.
106 posted on 01/01/2002 6:46:28 PM PST by soundsolutions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: soundsolutions
Clinton is above the law - God's and man's

Clinton has neither repented nor adequately suffered the consequences.

107 posted on 01/01/2002 9:06:51 PM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ
The Clinton negatives are high and getting higher. They would have to do some major cheating to win another election.

I think we saw in 2000 just how low the 'rats will go into the voter fraud department. They came up short in manufacturing votes this time; look for them to redouble their efforts in '02 and '04.

Case in point is Florida -- do you think the demofascists would have gone along with eliminating punch-card ballots if they hadn't already figured out how to cheat the new systems?

108 posted on 01/01/2002 9:38:55 PM PST by Morgan's Raider
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: randog
ask vince foster how muich money the 'toons had in switserland.
109 posted on 01/01/2002 9:48:38 PM PST by scott91
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Morgan's Raider
Actually, without a paper trail, the new system will be easier to cheat with. Your point is well taken:

Case in point is Florida -- do you think the demofascists would have gone along with eliminating punch-card ballots if they hadn't already figured out how to cheat the new systems?

110 posted on 01/02/2002 6:46:38 AM PST by GOPJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-110 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson