If necessary, I could supply you with a four-page SUMMARY of the "flaw" in the ND Constitution. I don't think you are that interested, frankly. But, if you read Reply 96 and my reply to "connectthedots" thereafter, you will find that others directly involved who can claim damages appreciate that there is a route to secure damages and the strongest is Hafer v. Melo 502 U.S. 21. I think I replied to her in Reply 103.
By the way, I am a paralegal who prepares documents for Federal court for attorneys, so you know from whence I speak.
I acknowledge the flaw; no need to pelt me with that: I think I made myself clear.
But again you evade the substance of my query. You're a paralegal: lay upon me an example of one who has the standing of an aggrieved party by reason of whatever wrong-doing.
Are you under a gag order?