Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Christian Review of The Fellowship of the Rings
Decent Films ^ | 12/18/01 | Steven Greydanus

Posted on 12/18/2001 6:04:52 PM PST by jrherreid

Review by Steven D. Greydanus

There can be no more fitting tribute to Peter Jackson’s The Fellowship of the Ring than to apply to it the words with which C. S. Lewis acclaimed the original book when Tolkien first wrote it: “Here are beauties that pierce like swords or burn like cold iron; here is a [film] that will break your heart.”

J. R. R. Tolkien’s wildly popular epic masterpiece The Lord of the Rings has been repeatedly hailed in surveys as the greatest book of the 20th century — over the sour objections of snarky literati unjustly deriding it as “escapist” and “adolescent,” damning it for its unconcealed lack of interest in such things as introspective character exploration, sex, and, in short, everything that the literati have decided is important and must be dealt with in any literary work that they are going to take seriously.

This peevish critical Tolkien-bashing has been cheerfully and solidly rebutted by more appreciative critics and scholars, among them Tolkien’s successor at Oxford, philologist T. A. Shippey (J. R. R. Tolkien: Author of the Century). Other recent works have focused on the significance of Tolkien’s world as a work of serious mythopoeia and religious imagination (for example, Joseph Pearce’s J. R. R. Tolkien: Man and Myth and Tolkien: A Celebration).

“If someone dislikes it,” poet and literary critic W. H. Auden once declared of Tolkien’s epic saga, “I shall never trust their literary judgment about anything again.”

I feel exactly the same way about the first of Jackson’s three films, one of the grandest, most joyous, most resonant, most richly satisfying films in years, a film that is an absolute must-see for both Tolkien fans and newcomers alike. (One caveat: Younger audiences may find the intense battle sequences and scary creatures more overwhelming on the big screen than on the printed page. Somewhere from ten to thirteen is probably a fair cutoff age.)

Like Tolkien’s book, Jackson’s The Fellowship of the Ring vividly conveys a sense of a great event ripped from a larger historical continuity, as rife in complexity and persuasive detail as our own world. Seldom if ever has the ancient theme of good versus evil been given mythic shape with such conviction and imaginative force. In fact, never before has this sort of epic mythopoeic adventure been successfully treated in a major film. Only Star Wars came close, transposing the melodic structures of myth and fairy tale into the register of science fiction.

Yet The Fellowship of the Ring not only has a specificity and moral depth lacking in Star Wars, it’s also a pure representative of its genre. In this film, an unbroken string of mediocre to terrible “fantasy” movies (Legend, Willow, Dragonslayer, etc.) has finally been broken. Like 2001: A Space Odyssey, The Fellowship of the Ring is unprecedented in its class; it is the uncontestable Citizen Kane of its genre, and may well be the first of one of the most noteworthy film series of all time.

Jackson and his team achieve this level of credibility in part by not approaching their subject as “fantasy.” Like Tolkien’s books, Jackson’s The Fellowship of the Ring has the weight of epic historical drama; one takes it more seriously than Braveheart or Gladiator. Yet it’s also more entertaining and more fun than either of those. Virtuoso moviemaking at every level, it combines eye-swimming production design, vanishingly invisible special effects, screenplay adaptation both faithful and inventive, masterful combat sequences, and cinematography as lush and soaring as the subject matter itself.

CLICK HERE FOR THE REST OF THIS REVIEW



TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last
Great review from a Catholic movie critic!
1 posted on 12/18/2001 6:04:53 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog; RosieCotton; billbears; ObfusGate; austinTparty; Texas2step; ecurbh; maquiladora...
One Ping...
2 posted on 12/18/2001 6:05:55 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
Thank you for the one ping....

I have MY tickets...

But they are for Saturday!!! :(

3 posted on 12/18/2001 6:22:51 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
I do like this review for its depth. It is clear that the reviewer is intimately familiar with the books, and did not read them for the sake of the movie review.
4 posted on 12/18/2001 6:24:31 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Yep--the Tolkien junkie reviews are always better. I'm one myself, and have been trying to convince some of the more hardcore Tolkienites that the movie will be just fine. (And I never did like Tom Bombadil, anyway...)
5 posted on 12/18/2001 6:27:30 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I'm seeing it tomorrow night!
6 posted on 12/18/2001 6:27:51 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
Blasphame!... I LOVED Tom Bombadil... AND Goldberry - The River-daughter, and of course the grand pony Fatty Lumpkin... (click my profile and look at the name of my pony)

Seriously... I Do love Tom... Loved his songs, loved his love of his woods and his lack of corruptability. He may be the reason I am still single... No one has measured up.... But I won't whine about it... got that out of my system the first couple of threads. I can visit Tom any time I want!

And his socks were yellow.

7 posted on 12/18/2001 6:37:34 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Just find a guy who wears a bright blue coat, yellow boots, and who can run through the rain without getting wet. Dime a dozen.
8 posted on 12/18/2001 6:41:30 PM PST by Gordian Blade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
We're going to see it in just over an hour! We'll be at this theater in Athens Georgia, wearing t-shirts from TheOneRing.net and carrying some signs. Mine says "Gandalf 3:16" :-)

Expect a full review later this evening.

9 posted on 12/18/2001 6:46:37 PM PST by Darth Sidious
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Gordian Blade
I wish... Alas... and I suppose my Dad would have a heart attack if I brought ole Tom home, with the wardrobe and the beard and all.... Probably accuse ole Tom of being a Seirra Clubber.
10 posted on 12/18/2001 6:47:42 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
Well, I liked Bill the Pony. Fatty Lumpkin was just kind of... well... just seemed out of place. The whole Bombadil episode was more of a"Farmer Giles of Ham" type of thing than a "Lord of the Rings" type of thing. In my opinion. :D

BTW, nice horses!

11 posted on 12/18/2001 6:48:16 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
I will try to stay up for the East-Coast early returns.

Have to make some coffee...

12 posted on 12/18/2001 6:49:04 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
You son of a bachelor! I have to wait until tomorrow!!
13 posted on 12/18/2001 6:49:34 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
Bill was a very good pony too... I just loved the name Fatty Lumpkin.
14 posted on 12/18/2001 6:51:52 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: jrherreid
I have to wait until tomorrow!!

Not me! However, since I live on the left coast, I still have over 4 hours to go. :-(

15 posted on 12/18/2001 6:53:29 PM PST by mtngrl@vrwc
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Darth Sidious
"Gandalf 3:16"

WhAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA!!!! Got me there,got to get a bumper sticker like that.

16 posted on 12/18/2001 6:57:48 PM PST by tet68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: tet68
I have the feeling that the party has moved... They have all left to go to the movie, and I am left alone to rake up the beer cans.
17 posted on 12/18/2001 7:11:40 PM PST by HairOfTheDog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog

18 posted on 12/18/2001 7:25:34 PM PST by jrherreid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tet68
This is a very beautiful review. Tomorrow, tomorrow!
19 posted on 12/18/2001 7:25:47 PM PST by Cascadians
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: HairOfTheDog
I'll be seeing it tomorrow. the whole system administrator's group is going to lunch and then to the film for our quarterly fun day.
20 posted on 12/18/2001 7:29:39 PM PST by Centurion2000
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson