[Gamma-131-I]

And the whole study should be thrown out the window and started over (or not...). As another person wrote, how do we know the other years' data wasn't tampered with too? In any event, I'd have to think the data from this run of the study is now tainted.

But then what do I know? I'm just a computer programmer. It's not like I really think they were actually trying to find the truth here. More like they had a conclusion in mind (the area is a habitat to an endangered species) and kept searching for some way to prove it.

Gamma

[woollyone]

"More like they had a conclusion in mind...and kept searching for some way to prove it."

Yup!...that the statists' typical method of operation though. *sigh*