Then there is a fundamental shift where the Writer is now asking questions and inserting a lot of his own commentary. Note that in the last few paragraphs there are no outsourced quotes.
This conclusively proves that the writer of the last few paragraphs could not be the same writer that wrote the first paragraphs.
I see you've got the literary style of sarcasm down. Don't you have anything relevant to say or add to the discussion? Do you see any validity to this theory? Or is this your way of saying you don't? I'm sorry, I'm not fluent in sarcasm.
Scripture wasn't put in written form until around 700 B. C. Before that stories were memorized. When the scribes started writing the stories down and they had different stories, they wrote both down because who were they to say one account was better than another.