To: jgoode
I think others were involved in OJ's cover-up. But OJ had to be the primary killer. Either that or he was foolish to leave his blood at the crime scene and get the victims' blood all over him.
19 posted on
12/05/2001 7:33:18 AM PST by
Chemnitz
To: Chemnitz
You do realize that none of O.J.'s blood was found at the scene until hours after he gave a sample to police. The detective that took the sample to the police department to be logged for evidence walked around for a couple of hours first with the vial in his jacket pocket, then lo and behold, there are a few drops on a gate and sidewalk that the police missed the previous three days. One of the top criminal forensics experts in the world then testified that the blood found on O.J.'s socks found laying on the cream carpet in his bedroom had the blood of Ron and Nicole pressed into it and there was no blood found on the carpeting. But anyway, you are right, O.J. did it, no need to examine the evidence.
To: Chemnitz
I think others were involved in OJ's cover-up. But OJ had to be the primary killer. If you think OJ is guilty what coverup are you talking about?
122 posted on
12/05/2001 9:41:36 AM PST by
mlo
To: Chemnitz
You are an idiot.
243 posted on
12/09/2001 4:40:16 PM PST by
jgoode
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson