Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Better run out and buy one of those "Segways".
1 posted on 12/05/2001 1:25:47 AM PST by mdittmar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mdittmar
By cutting 150,000, Russia is reducing production by about 2%. That doesn't sound like much, especially compared to Norway and Mexico, who are cutting comparable amounts off of already lower total production. But I'm not an expert, and small changes can lead to big price swings in some commodities. However, I was reading (here on FR, I think) about a week ago that the Russian oil industry is a very private, free-enterprise operation. Almost none of the production is under direct government control. The production companies are probably parts of an association, but I doubt that anyone has effective power to enforce production limits in Russia. They need money and will sell every barrel they can extract.
2 posted on 12/05/2001 1:48:11 AM PST by Stirner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mdittmar
From It Is Time to Declare War by Leonard Peikoff
Fifty years ago, Truman and Eisenhower surrendered the West's property rights in oil, although that oil rightfully belonged to those in the West whose science, technology, and capital made its discovery and use possible. The first country to nationalize a Western oil company, in 1951, was Iran. The rest, observing our frightened silence, hurried to grab off their piece of the newly available loot.

If America is not going to take back what is rightfully ours in the Middle East, then at least we should open up our own soil to exploration and production. But thanks to Traitor Lott, it looks like that is not going to happen:

Senate GOP gives up on energy vote

Of course, maybe the price of gasoline needs to get back to $2 per gallon before the cowards and traitors in the senate will release their death-grip on domestic oil production.

3 posted on 12/05/2001 2:04:25 AM PST by snopercod
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mdittmar
I have never and will never understand this. Why the hell do we let one cartel literally determine our economic future? I just don't get it. We should have been free from the chains of foreign oil decade ago.
4 posted on 12/05/2001 2:13:18 AM PST by paul544
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mdittmar
Gee - that was a brief alliance.
6 posted on 12/05/2001 5:22:33 AM PST by norton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mdittmar
I feared this would happen.

The US, Russia, Norway, Mexico, Kazakstan, Canada, and Turkmenistan need to form our own oil organization. Sell it for half the price of OPEC oil, but only to countries that boycott OPEC.

If it were to happen, the UK, Japan, and Australia would jump on board rather quickly, while the EU rots.

9 posted on 12/05/2001 12:54:40 PM PST by jae471
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mdittmar
"Carefully calculated." as in chess.
10 posted on 12/05/2001 2:01:19 PM PST by flamefront
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mdittmar
War On Terrorism: Diplomacy - US and Russia on verge of deal over oil and missiles

"RUSSIA AND the United States may be on the verge of a strategic and diplomatic grand bargain over missile defence, oil and Nato, as part of an extraordinary rapprochement made possible by the transformation of the international scene since 11 September."

14 posted on 12/05/2001 6:33:02 PM PST by Orion78
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson