You can't even get the quote right. It's "son of a Bush family friend".
If you go read Wallaby's article (which I found and linked), you'll see what I mean.
If indeed Hinkley tried to assassinate Reagan, then indeed it was the son of a Bush family friend/acquaintance who tried to assassinate Reagan.
Lord knows I try but I'm a little weak on "Coincidence Theory". I should think that the Bush Family itself (enamoured as they are of "sending a message") understand this sort of thing perfectly well.
You must be the only person in this country who is glad that Bush is president only because it allows you to post all that garbage on your hard drive out in public.
Lord knows I try but I'm a little weak on "Coincidence Theory". I should think that the Bush Family itself (enamoured as they are of "sending a message") understand this sort of thing perfectly well.
You're backtracking here. First you insinuate that Bush was behind's Reagan's assassination attempt. Then you say that he wasn't, but the evil "they" who were behind it were sending him a message. Wow, spooky -- one of Bush's five children knew one of John Hinckley's brothers. And what was this "psuedo-MESSAGE," as you call it? It's a pretty weak one, if you ask me.