To: NautiNurse
There is evidence and it fits a pattern that you are missing. Iraq had and HAS a huge Anthrax arsenal. Their bio-weapon scientist (hiding out in Virginia) openly states that the Bentonite traces in one of the two strains means that, without a doubt, this is Iraq. And as for the other strain, At the trial of one of his associates, it was admitted by him that Bin Laden bought $15,000 of powdered Anthrax spores from Czecholslovakia, and elsewhere. Gee, doesn't EVERYBODY? And one of the At-large suspected Pakistani's on an expired student visa who lived along the route of the Anthrax-contaminated PO Box in NJ did mysteriously VANISH from his apartment after Sept. 28...when the postal lady came down with the symptoms. How many and how tight to do dots have to be before you start seeing you need to connect them??? This is not a freaking court of 'laws'. There are no rules other than the rule of possibility with terrorists.
To: Paul Ross
I'm not missing anything. I never said anything about domestic terrorism with the anthrax. Rebdov is attributing things to me that I never said.
To: Paul Ross
It is frankly amazing. A person reads ONE line of a message, ignores all else and launches an attack. Now she claims I am putting words in her mouth. No, she ignored the words that came from mine. HAHAHA. This is like Kafka's Trial. I resented the assumption by government that this anthrax couldn't Al-Qeda because it doesn;tfit their pattern therefore it must be domestic. I thought that was silly. We only have 911, we haven'tseen enough from them to establish a pattern.Who knows what next they have in store for us.
72 posted on
10/28/2001 8:38:03 PM PST by
rebdov
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson