Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

US and Russia on verge of deal over oil and missiles
The Independent ^ | Oct 20, 2001 | RUPERT CORNWELL

Posted on 10/19/2001 9:20:36 PM PDT by CommiesOut

War On Terrorism: Diplomacy - US and Russia on verge of deal over oil and missiles
The Independent - United Kingdom; Oct 20, 2001
BY RUPERT CORNWELL IN WASHINGTON

RUSSIA AND the United States may be on the verge of a strategic and diplomatic grand bargain over missile defence, oil and Nato, as part of an extraordinary rapprochement made possible by the transformation of the international scene since 11 September.

The trade-off would have many elements, each offering advantages to both sides. On missile defence, Moscow is sending signals it is ready to accept a modification of the 1972 Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty, which it had hitherto insisted was the cornerstone of nuclear arms control - but which the White House's cherished anti-missile shield would breach.

In return, America seems ready to embark on massive cuts in its nuclear arsenal, for which Moscow has long been pressing. This in turn would encourage greater co-operation between Nato and Russia, especially in the fight against terrorism, where Russia sees its bloody and thus far unavailing campaign in Chechnya as of a piece with the American offensive against the Taliban in Afghanistan.

The co-operation may not go as far as joint military operations. However, Russia has already gone well beyond anything seen since the Second World War by granting overflight permission for American military operations, and sanctioning the deployment of US troops in Uzbekistan - and perhaps other former Soviet central Asian republics, now independent but still within Moscow's sphere of influence.

In return, Moscow wants - and has apparently been tacitly promised - a softening of official Western criticism of its human rights record in Chechnya, on the basis that this military campaign, however brutal, is part and parcel of the new global struggle against terrorism.

Of greatest potential importance in the long run is central Asian and Russian oil and gas, which constitute an ever more attractive alternative source of supply given the growing fears of political instability in the Gulf, not least in Saudi Arabia, America's biggest source of imported oil.

In the past, political uncertainties in the region, a lack of pipeline capacity and ample world energy supplies have slowed development of the massive central Asian oil and gas fields.

All that may now change - and again to the obvious advantage of both sides: security of supply for America; and a huge economic boost for the impoverished former Soviet states and for Russia, through which many pipelines run.

The prospective deal began to take clearer shape after a meeting in Shanghai between the Secretary of State, Colin Powell, and the Russian Foreign Minister, Igor Ivanov.

This will be followed by a private session between the President, George Bush, and his Russian counterpart, Vladimir Putin, on the sidelines of the Apec summit of Pacific Rim countries in the Chinese city.

Officials caution that the precise framework may not be settled in Shanghai, nor even when President Putin travels to Texas next month. But rarely have the pieces in the jigsaw of improving Russia/US relations appeared to fit so perfectly.

Russian diplomats quoted by the normally reliable Interfax news agency said the summit at President Bush's ranch near Waco - which, before September 11, some in Moscow were publicly doubting would even take place - would now be "of exceptional significance".

General Powell was no less upbeat. "Not only is the Cold War over," he declared in Shanghai, "the post-Cold War period is also over".

American officials travelling with General Powell went even further, talking of an "across the board" change in attitude in the Kremlin towards co-operation with the West.

More even than the renewed talk of a Palestinian state, or the rediscovered friendship between America and Pakistan, or the curious diplomatic ballet being played out between Washington and its former nemesis Iran, the new climate between the one-time superpower rivals is proof of how international relations have been turned upside down by the terrorist attacks in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.

One startling sign has already come this week, with the closure of Russia's 40-year-old electronic eavesdropping facility at Lourdes, near Havana, and its naval operations at Cam Ranh Bay in Vietnam. Ostensibly the decision to close installations that symbolised the Cold War was to save money for the strapped Russian defence budget. But it also removed a severe irritant in US relations with Moscow.

The moves were instantly hailed by Mr Bush as proof that "the Cold War is over". Now he will use exactly the same argument to promote his missile defence plans, to which he is more, rather than less, committed as a consequence of 11 September.

The ABM treaty was "outdated, antiquated and useless", the President declared last week - and the Russians seem to be edging towards acceptance of that rationale.

One reason for the softening is Mr Putin's domestic political strength, enabling him to override the diehard anti-American mindset of some Russian politicians. But he can also point to the advantages to Russia of a new approach, and to how the unyielding unilateralism of the early Bush administration has also been a casualty of the 11 September atrocities.

All Material Subject to Copyright



TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

1 posted on 10/19/2001 9:20:37 PM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: madrussian; malarski; Askel5; GROUCHOTWO; Zviadist; Free the USA; Black Jade; Carry_Okie
Uh oh... Bad news for our M.E. friends. All of them.
Now they have to provoke something even more sinister.
Bumpy ride ahead.
2 posted on 10/19/2001 9:23:24 PM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jmp702
.
3 posted on 10/19/2001 9:25:34 PM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
I would love to get out of the old Saudi oil blackmail scheme even if it meant getting some of our supply from our new friend the Russian Federation of States. I want to see the arabs eat sand for about 1,000 years!
4 posted on 10/19/2001 9:26:08 PM PDT by seeker41
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
bump
5 posted on 10/19/2001 9:29:16 PM PDT by Free the USA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Colin Powell declares: "I believe it is peace in our time."
6 posted on 10/19/2001 9:32:37 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Yep, here it comes a new "Northern Alliance" circling the globe: North America-Europe-Russia. I sense a new alignment in the world coming based on a Containment strategy we used against "communism" (do we care about that -ism much any more?). The containment target is moslems and their nations, kind of a Caliphate OBL dreamed of, or Islamism. Due to borders, internal minorities, and desire to keep the world economy sttable the "containers," or "allies" if you will, will be the core areas of North America, Europe, Russia, China and India, with periphery partners like Japan.

I wish I could find it again, but I read an article by a Lebanese intellectual warning Arabs that this whole mess has put the USA and Russia together, implying that the Arabs could no longer play off the two. They may be getting more than that...

7 posted on 10/19/2001 9:37:37 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
In return, America seems ready to embark on massive cuts in its nuclear arsenal, for which Moscow has long been pressing.

No!!! I love my nukes. We need more, not less. Russia still has almost 2:1 ratio over us.

8 posted on 10/19/2001 9:37:50 PM PDT by SirAllen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: seeker41
Russian ICBM's are usless even if they could afford them. Addict America to cheap Caspian sea oil and watch middle east fade back into the dessert. Nuclear war is for suckers, energy supplies rule!
9 posted on 10/19/2001 9:39:04 PM PDT by operation clinton cleanup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Thanks for the post!
10 posted on 10/19/2001 9:39:50 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Big Steve; deport; Irma; PhiKapMom; Wait4Truth; blackie; Deb
Bump
11 posted on 10/19/2001 9:42:29 PM PDT by Lady In Blue
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SirAllen
No!!! I love my nukes. We need more, not less. Russia still has almost 2:1 ratio over us

As do I...However I think that we probably have something better by now, Nukes are so 1940's.

12 posted on 10/19/2001 9:43:45 PM PDT by Dosa26
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Bump.
13 posted on 10/19/2001 9:45:26 PM PDT by Faraday
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
Yeah, looks like Israel is quickly losing its significance. Bummer.
14 posted on 10/19/2001 9:47:44 PM PDT by madrussian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SirAllen
As I understand it, atomic weapons need a great deal of care and feeding to keep them in prime working order. They aren't something that you can build and then just put on a shelf for storage. However, I'm no expert in this field and I will gladly defer to the opinion of anyone who has more knowlege.

However, if I am correct in my assumptions, then there is a fair question as to just how much of the Russian arsenel is actually useable, with a fair chance that most of it has fallen into disrepair.

15 posted on 10/19/2001 9:48:39 PM PDT by Billy_bob_bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Dosa26
It's looking like Saudi Araba and Egypt will end up like the Afgans - poor and with wacko muslems in control?
16 posted on 10/19/2001 9:50:18 PM PDT by america-rules
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: madrussian
Now, who will provoke what? Any ideas?
17 posted on 10/19/2001 9:55:55 PM PDT by CommiesOut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: CommiesOut
I think Bush and Putin have a secret plan that they are unleashing on us one step at a time. This can only mean good things with our fight with terrorism.
18 posted on 10/19/2001 9:56:27 PM PDT by Crispy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: operation clinton cleanup
Yup. I like it.
19 posted on 10/19/2001 9:57:04 PM PDT by paul51
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: madrussian
Hardly, If this were true and we could reduce or eliminate our dependence on middle east oil we could take the moral high road and completely support Israel, the only democracy with any civil rights in the mid-east. Buh-Bye terrorists.
20 posted on 10/19/2001 9:58:52 PM PDT by The Vast Right Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson