Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

W I D E B O D Y strikes again!
News 12, The American Spectator | 10-15-01 | Mia T

Posted on 10/15/2001 11:16:34 AM PDT by Mia T

W I D E B O D Y
strikes again
 

Clinton OK After Airport Incident

News/Current Events
Source:
News 12
Published: 10/14/01
Posted on 10/14/01 8:04 PM Pacific by
areafiftyone

YONKERS - A bizarre accident at Westchester County Airport involved Senator Hillary Clinton's entourage Sunday.

Sources tell News 12 Westchester that a vehicle in Senator Clinton's security team tried to bypass a mandatory check point at the airport, which has been under a heightened state of alert since the terrorist attacks. A county police officer attempting to stop the vehicle from getting through injured his shoulder. That officer was taken to Saint Agnes Hospital in White Plains, and his condition is not known.

Senator Clinton, who turned 54 Sunday, was en route to board a private jet to an unreleased destination. The former first lady could not be reached for comment.

IN HER GRASP FOR POWER, DEPRAVED WIDEBODY COWARD (WITH AN EXAGGERATED SENSE OF SELF-IMPORTANCE)
Pushy Dame

Online Prowler--The American Spectator

 
Sen. Hillary Clinton is losing fans by the day on Capitol Hill due to
her performance at last Tuesday's Bush address to Congress.
 
According to congressional reporters, Senator Clinton pushed fragile
Republican Strom Thurmond out of the way in order to get to the NBC New
York affiliate's camera crew. "Thurmond stumbled and nearly fell down,
but Sen. Ted Kennedy grabbed hold of him," says one of the reporter
witnesses.
 
Clinton has also further angered her own leadership. Her staff
presented Senate Minority Leader Tom Daschle with a request that he
approve two additional positions for her office at salaries of $85,000
or more. "She wants to hire a permanent staff pollster and media
adviser," says a source in the minority leader's office. "She explained
that they would be available to all of her Democratic colleagues, but
they would work out of her offices."
 
The so-called "office expenses" indicate how naive Clinton is about
real-world politics. It would be next to impossible to hire a pollster
at a salary of $85,000, let alone cover the costs of polling out of a
Senate office. "She's thinking like a first lady, and not a freshman
senator," says the Daschle aide. "But no one has the nerve to tell her
where to get off."
 

(Updated 3/5/01 at 12:30 p.m.)

Q ERTY4
co-rapist's typo

The clintons' fundamental error: They are too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.

Mia T

Mindless rhinestone-studded-and-tented kleptocracy

 

 
 
"Hillary's people are very bright," said a well-connected Democrat yesterday. "But they think everybody else is stupid."
Stupid is as stupid does, says Off the Record. . .

OFF THE RECORD: AN OLD DOG NEEDS NEW TRICKS

 
Don't lose
Your head
To gain a minute
You need your head
Your brains are in it.
--an old roadside ad, Pushme-Pullyou
 
 
 
 

HEY, HEY MARY JO!
by Mia T
 
So many pardons 4 sale.
 
So many rodhams & clintons to nail.
 
Hey, hey Mary Jo!
 
Can you spell R-I-C-O?



TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

1 posted on 10/15/2001 11:16:34 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I can't believe the title is "Clinton ok...". Clinton ok? She is the one who ran in to the guard! How's he doing?
2 posted on 10/15/2001 11:18:42 AM PDT by Rodney King
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
I thought this was an incident in Clinton, Oklahoma. Whew! Glad she wasn't around here.
3 posted on 10/15/2001 11:23:05 AM PDT by Brett66
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
bump. and if it had been a M16 weaponized sentinel? ... that idiot is lucky she was not shot at.
4 posted on 10/15/2001 11:24:31 AM PDT by lavaroise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
This is airport security. National Guard troops should have been called in. The Air Force should have forced the plane down.
5 posted on 10/15/2001 11:25:20 AM PDT by Tai_Chung
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
That lady seems to be doing her damndest not to get re-elected to public office.
6 posted on 10/15/2001 11:26:31 AM PDT by Captain Ugly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rodney King
Exactly.

And notice how the injury was inflicted by the police officer -- not the W I D E B O D Y oink.

And I'd like to know whether this paragon of Paragould -- er -- courage -- has boarded a commercial jet post-9-11.

7 posted on 10/15/2001 11:31:43 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
This country will never be save as long as Hitlary Clinton continues to remain free.
8 posted on 10/15/2001 11:33:30 AM PDT by rebapiper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lavaroise; Mia T
..... bump. and if it had been a M16 weaponized sentinel? ... that idiot is lucky she was not shot at .....

You call waking up every morning and looking all around -- and then in the mirror -- and seeing that bone-marrow-butt-ugliness looking out at you -- and saying, "is this all there is?" -- lucky?

Nah.

For her, taking one behind the ear would be "lucky."

9 posted on 10/15/2001 11:38:17 AM PDT by Brian Allen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Captain Ugly
That lady seems to be doing her damndest not to get re-elected to public office.

My suspicion about liberals is that they are gutless craven cowards and if a leader abuses them, they love her for it.

You'll notice it's very rare for a CONSERVATIVE woman to complain about spousal abuse. She spots the warning signs before marriage, and exits the relationship. It's liberal women who bow down in abusive relationships. Hillary knows her demographic. That's why she got her hubby elected, and that's why she got herself elected.

10 posted on 10/15/2001 11:40:56 AM PDT by 537 Votes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Was Vince Foster collecting osama bin laden money for influence--secrets(treason)!
11 posted on 10/15/2001 11:41:13 AM PDT by f.Christian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rebapiper
"Somebody needs to do the rest of his [Vignali's] time. Somebody
politically in either L.A. or Washington needs to do the rest of his
time -- and I'll do the paperwork for it."
Rodham revelation angers Twin Cities investigators
 
 
 
68 rms riv view
NY househunting for AR felons
In my view, "Newgate" would be the perfect home for the clintons.
Erected in rural country ("pleasant, airy, and salubrious," as Thomas Eddy called the site in his 1801 book), Newgate was located about two miles above City Hall in what is now Greenwich Village. (Selling point: Hillary-as-Giuliani-irritant is inversely proportional to distance of clinton abode from City Hall.) Construction was begun in the summer of 1796 and finished in late 1797.
 
On four acres overlooking the Hudson River, the Doric-style building was of two stories with a cupola, surrounded by a stone wall ranging from 14 to 23 feet high. It contained 54 12-by-I 8-foot rooms designed for eight persons each; there were also 14 solitary cells, eight feet by six feet and 14-foot high, with windows eight feet from the floor, for a total capacity of 446 occupants. A large room for a chapel was set aside, as were living quarters for the keeper and his family. Another two-story building of brick, 200 feet long by 20 feet wide, contained the work-shops. There was also a garden "in excellent order," as Eddy wrote. 'The entire cost of the grounds, buildings, and a wharf on the river-front was $208,846. The first "residents" arrived Nov.28, 1797.
 
Caveat emptor!
The clintons would be wrong to automatically equate the creepingly leftist location and incipiently leftist penal code of New York's first state prison with suitability.
 
Although Newgate was the embodiment of a new, "more enlightened" penal code--prior to Newgate, 16 crimes were punishable by death in New York, including murder, rape, robbery, treason, burglary, the taking of goods from a church, forgery and counterfeiting--it must be emphasized that treason and murder were retained as capital offenses as were all other felonies, if committed a second time.
 
Truth-in-advertising compels me to disclose that Newgate no longer exists. But this small detail should pose absolutely no problem for the clintons and their promiscuous campaigns, all of which being, after all, mock documentaries about non-entities, the paradoxical personification of nothingness.
 

 
 
 
Are you ready to SING, SING, SING
--doug from upland
 
 
 
Up the River Means Downwardly Mobile
 
Sing-Sing and the clintons would be a great fit, 68 rms riv view and Newgate notwithstanding. Imagine the two grim, oranged-suited, arrogant mobsters, marching in silent lockstep, their proximity to the infamous death house and the electric chair causing them quotidian night sweats, (If it's good enough for Ricky Ray Rector. . .). Imagine their fear, their subjugation to overbearing authority (If it's good enough for Billy Dale. . .) All the stuff of Sing-Sing legend. . .
 
Sing-Sing (much like the clintons, themselves) was conceived as a profit-making if exploitive enterprise. It was located on the Silver Mine Farm, an abandoned 130-acre mining site on the banks of the Hudson River precisely because of its rich quarry which provided materials for the construction of the prison (built with prisoner labor) and future sales.

The clintons, who have several decades of experience turning prisons into profit-making enterprises--(see BLOOD TRAIL NEWS ARCHIVES)--not to mention copious experience in fraudulent mining ventures--(see Zairean quid pro quo)--will feel right at home in Sing-Sing.


12 posted on 10/15/2001 11:43:36 AM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
This is the most disturbing post I've seen in quite awhile. If you are this obsessed with Hillary Clinton, you are not of sound mind, in my opinion.
13 posted on 10/15/2001 11:46:59 AM PDT by FreeYourMind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
OMG! I just got a mental image of Hiltery having to be patted down at the security check point. I think the injured shoulder is better than having to do the above search. ;^)
14 posted on 10/15/2001 11:47:47 AM PDT by Balata
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Balata
LOL! Can you imagine putting your hands on that black pants suit--Old Crusty--I wonder how bad it smells?

The Tarheel

15 posted on 10/15/2001 12:02:18 PM PDT by Tarheel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: FreeYourMind
You are either uninformed (FreedYourMind?)
or on the co-rapist's staff (or both).
 
Bill Clinton may not be the worst president America has had, but surely he is the worst person to be president. There is reason to believe that he is a rapist ("You better get some ice on that," Juanita Broaddrick says he told her concerning her bit lip), and that he bombed a country to distract attention from legal difficulties arising from his glandular life, and that. ... Furthermore, the bargain that he and his wife call a marriage refutes the axiom that opposites attract. Rather, she, as much as he, perhaps even more so, incarnates Clintonism

---GEORGE WILL, Sleaze, the sequel

The rape took place while Bill was running for governor. Hillary came bursting into the room to talk to two people, one of whom I personally know. She said "You won't believe what this &^%$#@#$%^ did now. He tried to rape some b*tch."

It was the job of these two to squelch the story.

doug from upland to Shaun Hannity, WABC, 10/16/00

You had questioned the gentleman who drove you and Mr. Clinton from the airport. You asked him about me and if I would be at the gathering. Do you remember? You told the driver, "Bill has talked so much about Juanita", and that you were so anxious to meet me. Well, you wasted no time. As soon as you entered the room, you came directly to me and grabbed my hand. Do you remember how you thanked me, saying "we want to thank you for everything that you do for Bill". At that point, I was pretty shaken and started to walk off. Remember how you kept a tight grip on my hand and drew closer to me? You repeated your statement, but this time with a coldness and look that I have seen many times on television in the last eight years. You said, "Everything you do for Bill". You then released your grip and I said nothing and left the gathering.

What did you mean, Hillary? Were you referring to my keeping quiet about the assault I had suffered at the hands of your husband only two weeks before? Were you warning me to continue to keep quiet? We both know the answer to that question.

JUANITA BROADDRICK, AN OPEN LETTER TO HILLARY CLINTON

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

Christopher Shays, Shays Shocker: Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice

It's no longer acceptable to say that the abuse and mistreatment of women is cultural. It should be called what it is: criminal."

-- Hillary Rodham Clinton, addressing the UN, 3.4.99  

As we've learned from the Juanita Broaddrick story (non-story, I should say) and countless others, the Clintons will do their best Muhammad Ali impression and play rope-a-dope one more time. Like they said - they've got to "get back to the business of the American people." You know - degrading the military, censoring the Internet, and bombing other countries. There's no time to deal with rape allegations or small details like a contempt charge.

---No Person is Above the Law

"Who is Juanita Broaddrick? I've never heard of her!" cried Betty Friedan, the founder of modern feminism. Friedan's outburst came at last Fridayís conference, entitled "The Legacy and Future of Hillary Rodham Clinton." Held at the American Enterprise Institute in Washington. D.C., the event offered a chilling microcosm of an angry, divided America.

For nearly an hour, a five-woman panel had been debating whether Hillary qualified as a "feminist heroine." I thought Broaddrick's claim of having been raped by Hillary's husband had some bearing on this point, so I broached the subject during the question-and-answer period. Friedan's dyspeptic denial followed.

Was Friedan telling the truth? Maybe. And maybe all those millions of Germans who professed ignorance of the death camps were telling the truth too. The problem is, having admitted her ignorance, Friedan showed no interest in exploring the matter further. And that was the problem with the Germans too.

Totalitarian impulses flourished at the conference. Taking a page from Soviet psychiatry, some Clintonites suggested that Hillary hating might be a mental illness. . .

---Richard Poe, The Hillary Conspiracy

The clinton Rapes: Credit where credit is due...
Even hillary hagiographer, Gail Sheehy, concedes that hillary clinton deserves no less than half of the credit for the clinton rapes.
She made the money, she laid out the political strategy. She fought his political enemies for him. She gave him a beautiful child. She was an excellent mother. What more could you want in a political wife? So these other little escapades on the side were just, you know, white noise.---GAIL SHEEHY
Historically, hillary clinton has always been a co-equal partner in clintoncrime.
Specifically, hillary clinton raped, too. For two decades, for power, for all intents and purposes, hillary clinton both provided and pinned her husband's prey as he raped them, again and again.
 
In a novel twist of logic and reality during the First Rapist's impeachment trial, the co-rapist portrayed the endless string of clinton rapes as significant clinton public policy, euphemistically dubbing chronic clinton predation "ministering to troubled young girls."

Mia T, First Rapist's Rose-Garden Escape: The Full Story

With Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
 
 
Thursday August 3, 2000; 9:35 AM EDT
 
Shays Reveals Details of Clinton's 'Horrific' Broaddrick Rape
 
Arkansas nursing home operator Juanita Broaddrick told impeachment
investigators she was raped not once but twice by Bill Clinton during a
brutal attack in a Little Rock hotel room 22 years ago, Connecticut
Congressman Christopher Shays revealed Wednesday.
 
Shays was one of forty moderate congressional Republicans to visit the
Ford Building evidence room during the House impeachment probe, where
Broaddrick's accusation and documentation of other alleged Clinton
crimes were made available for review.
 
Five days after Clinton was impeached by the House, Shays told the New
York Times that the evidence was, "very alarming and very unsettling,"
involving, "conduct by the president that is alleged to be pretty
horrific."
 
In his comments to the Times Shays made no mention of the second attack
on Broaddrick.
 
But when asked about the Ford Building evidence on Wednesday by WELI New
Haven talk-radio host Tom Scott, Shays replied, "I believed that he had
done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it
was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event."
 
When Scott asked Shays if he believes the president is a rapist, the
congressman replied, "I would like not to say it that way.
But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."
 
Shays comments to Scott were first reported by National Review Online
late Wednesday.
 
The reactions of other House members who viewed the evidence at the time
suggested that Clinton's assault on Broaddrick was more disturbing than
what has been reported in the press since.
 
Just days after the impeachment vote Arizona Rep. Matt Salmon told the
Arizona Republic that what he saw in the Ford Building left him
"nauseated." Delaware Rep. Mike Castle was reduced to tears, according
to CNBC's Chris Matthews.
 
The shocking presidential rape evidence briefly moved Shays into the
pro-impeachment column, he told the Times after the vote. But a personal
meeting with Clinton, Shays said, changed his mind.
 
Not a single U.S. Senator viewed the Ford Building evidence before
voting to acquit Clinton on two articles of impeachment.
 
In 1999, Georgia Congressman Bob Barr told NewsMax.com that the Ford
Building materials would remain sealed unless the American people
demanded their release.

Shays Shocker Clinton Raped Broaddrick Twice.

National Review Online
By NR staff
8/02/2000

Connecticut Rep. Chris Shays said on a talk radio show Wednesday that, based on secret evidence he reviewed during the impeachment controversy, he believes President Clinton raped Juanita Broaddrick, not once, but twice.

Talk-show host Tom Scott of Clear Channel Broadcasting, New Haven (WELI 960) asked Shays about the mysterious impeachment "evidence room," prompting the GOP moderate to say that Broaddrick "disclosed that she had been raped, not once, but twice" to Judiciary Committee investigators.

Shays, who is often hailed by the New York Times for his independent judgment and good sense, found the evidence compelling:

"I believed that he had done it. I believed her that she had been raped 20 years ago. And it was vicious rapes, it was twice at the same event." Asked point blank if the president is a rapist, Shays said, "I would like not to say that it way. But the bottom line is that I believe that he did rape Broaddrick."

And Shays voted against impeachment!

 

LINK
 
by Mia T
 
It is natural for man to indulge in the illusions of hope.
We are apt to shut our eyes against a painful truth,
and listen to the song of that siren
till she transforms us into beasts.
Is this the part of wise men,
engaged in a great and arduous struggle for liberty?
Are we disposed to be the number of those
who, having eyes, see not,
and having ears, hear not,
the things which so nearly concern their temporal salvation?
For my part, whatever anguish of spirit it may cost,
I am willing to know the whole truth;
to know the worst, and to provide for it.
-----------------Patrick Henry
 
In a dark time, the eye begins to see.
----------------- Theodore Roethke
 

THE BOTTOM LINE:

 

16 posted on 10/15/2001 12:02:28 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeYourMind
Well, that just proves it!

She drives us crazy!

17 posted on 10/15/2001 12:07:18 PM PDT by Betty Jo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: FreeYourMind
You must not know of MIA T.

Ya gotta do research.

18 posted on 10/15/2001 12:11:56 PM PDT by Mark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: rebapiper; FreeYourMind

Olson Book's Chilling Warning: Clinton's Terrorist Pardons Sent Signal

Crime/Corruption
Source:
News Max
Published: Oct. 14, 2001 Author: Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff
Posted on 10/14/01 8:23 PM Pacific by
concerned about politics

In a bone chilling chapter of her new book "The Final Days," late heroine-author Barbara Olson warned that ex-president Bill Clinton's pardons of terrorists who had repeatedly bombed buildings in New York City "send a signal" that the U.S. isn't serious about fighting terrorism.

In words that now seem like a harbinger of her own Sept. 11 death at the hands of the Middle Eastern terrorists, Olson cited example after example of how U.S. officials strenuously warned Clinton that pardoning FALN Puerto Rican separatists who had waged their own bombing jihad on America posed a threat to national security.

In August 1999 Clinton pardoned 16 FALN terrorists without even being asked, in a move that was widely seen as a cynical ploy to win Hispanic votes for his wife's New York senate bid.

The group had planned and executed 130 bombing attacks on New York, Chicago and Washington, D.C. from 1974 to 1983. Miraculously, the FALN managed to kill just six Americans. But hundreds more were seriously wounded.

Law enforcement officials were stunned when Clinton decided to pardon the FALN bombers.

"The FBI's assistant director of national security, Neil Gallagher, said that the people turned loose by Clinton 'are criminals, and they are terrorists, and they represent a threat to the United States,'" Olson wrote.

In a subchapter eerily headlined "Pardons for Terrorists Send a Signal," she reported:

"President Clinton had not bothered to consult with relatives of victims of FALN terrorism. In fact, the survivors of those murdered and those whose lives had otherwise been destroyed by the terrorists were not even informed that their attackers were being released."

Olson continued:

"Deputy Attorney General Eric Holder.... conceded that the nation owed much greater consideration to the victims. And Holder's boss, Janet Reno, explicitly acknowledged that groups aligned with the FALN still posed a threat to national security."

In comments turned gut-wrenching in light of last month's attacks, former Justice Department pardon attorney Margaret Love told the late author that Clinton's terrorist pardons should have set off alarm bells.

"We should have seen a big flashing red light because of the FALN cases.... That was a foreshoadowing of what happened later."

Love was referring to Clinton's January 2001 pardons of drug dealers and international fugitives, not the attacks on the U.S., which no one foresaw. But it's nearly impossible now to read those words as anything but prophesy of the terrorist acts that murdered Olson and nearly 6,000 others last month.

In a moment of now legendary heroism, the late author telephoned her husband, Solicitor General Ted Olson, from American Flight 175 to warn that terrorists had hijacked her plane. Mr. Olson had the terrible task of telling his wife that two planes had slammed into New York's World Trade Center minutes before.

Barbara Olson's phone call was the first warning the government had that Washington, D.C. had come under similar attack.

In comments sure to irk those who argued for eight years that Bill Clinton's private life was nobody else's business, the late author contends that the terrorist pardons were payback for Mrs. Clinton indulging her husband's decades of rampant philandering.

"Hillary had done a lot of heavy lifting for her husband, much of it, such as the various bimbo eruptions, that required her to hold her nose. She had to cover for her husband and lie."

Olson called the FALN pardons Bill Clinton's "first return on her investment."

Though a lively debate has raged ever since Sept. 11 over whether the ex-president did as much as he could to stop Osama bin Laden, the one-time congressional Clinton investigator is the first to raise the FALN pardon question at any length.

Perhaps now Sen. Clinton, who has made herself newly available on the TV talk show circuit since the World Trade Center attacks, will be asked whether she agrees with Olson that her husband's terrorist pardons "sent a signal."

 

 

 

"My client had nothing to do with the low-rent, trailer-park trash politicians who infested our country for the past eight years."

--Michael Rosen, lawyer for Thomas Gambino, son of late Mafia boss Carlo Gambino

New York Post via The Wall Street Journal

(Michael Rosen was understandably eager to distance his client, a convicted loan shark, from the clintons. Another Thomas Gambino reportedly paid $50,000 to roger clinton in an unsuccessful effort to get a pardon for his father, Rosario Gambino.),

It's not easy to play fair against Mr. and Mrs. Clinton, who, in the words of the authors, "operated like a crime family, expecting friends and aides to protect them even against their own best interests." What's amazing, of course, is that's exactly what Clinton friends and aides have always done, from Susan McDougal to Webster Hubbell to flocks of nameless White House special assistants. Even Jim McDougal died just in time to deprive the independent counsel of a key witness against Mrs. Clinton, thus derailing what the authors report to have been her likely indictment for perjury and obstruction related to the Whitewater investigation....     

Reading the tumultuous events of the Lewinsky probe in a comprehensive narrative is unlike attempting to make sense of it in daily doses. Something different comes through the heavy accumulation of detail of, for example, the duplicity of the Justice Department, or the sharklike behavior of the White House. One begins to get a choking sense of the atmosphere of corruption and ruthlessness the Clintons inhabit -- and, worse, have forced the rest of us to inhabit. Taken in one piece, the habitual, even casual abuse of power on display begins to resemble conditions one normally associates with a state of totalitarianism, where such concepts as truth and justice are only paid lip service. In the end, then, it makes you wonder when there will be fresh air again.

-----Crime-family values

"I did not have any involvement in the pardons that were granted or not granted," insisted Sen. KnowNothing, seeming to forget her presence at the New-Square/Oval-Office schmooze that secured pardons for the four Hasidic felons who set up a phony school in Brooklyn to swindle the government out of millions intended for the poor.

Mia T, Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton Effectively Pleads 5TH in Press Conference by Invoking Spousal Privilege

HEY, HEY MARY JO!
by Mia T
 
So many pardons 4 sale.
 
So many rodhams & clintons to nail.
 
Hey, hey Mary Jo!
 
Can you spell R-I-C-O?

Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton Holds News Conference
EFFECTIVELY PLEADS 5TH BY INVOKING SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE

by Mia T

 

WASHINGTON- February 22. Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton held her premiere press conference today on Capitol Hill, ostensibly to answer questions about the peddling of White House pardons by her brother and her campaign treasurer. Notably absent among the press queries were any about her own involvement not only in those pardons, but in the larger universe of sold pardons--the incipient clinton scandal du jour--Pardongate.

KnowNothing's brother, Hugh Rodham, secured two of the 141 clinton midnight pardons, one for a cocaine kingpin and the other for a snake-oil swindler. Rodham netted a quick $400,000 for his "work" according to various rodhams and clintons and their assorted lawyers. KnowNothing's campaign treasurer, William Cunningham III, himself a law partner of longtime KnowNothing adviser Harold Ickes, helped obtain last-minute pardons for two convicted felons.

LA FAMIGLIA

Displaying a willingness to throw her brother (along with her husband) to the wolves, Sen. Victim Clinton was quick to make a distinction between her big, bad brother's pardon "work" and that of her campaign treasurer, "a fine lawyer and a fine man." The "family" connection of brother Rodham to Clinton made brother Rodham's "work" bad, bad, bad, whereas the campaign treasurer Cunningham's connection to the senator and her campaign coffers made his securing of two pardons in record time a sterling example of highminded, effective public service.

KnowNothing is apparently not the best of thinkers. If the "family" connection makes lobbying for cocaine-kingpin and snake-oil-swindler pardons bad, bad, bad for brother Rodham, then the "family" connection makes lobbying for the Hasidim 4 (see Keating 5) pardons bad, badder, baddest for the wife, First Lady and senator-elect. Moreover, pardons for votes is arguably worse than pardons for dough.

EFFECTIVELY PLEADS 5TH BY INVOKING SPOUSAL PRIVILEGE

KnowNothing specifically declined to answer when asked whether she discussed the pardons with her husband, effectively pleading the 5th. Turning aside questions about the pardon decisions her husband had made, she told reporters they should address those issues with him and his staff. She refused to say whether he should agree to appear voluntarily before congressional committees investigating the pardons. Interestingly, no one asked her whether she would agree to appear voluntarily before those same congressional committees.

I DIDN'T HAVE SEX WITH THAT PARDON

"I did not have any involvement in the pardons that were granted or not granted," insisted Sen. KnowNothing, seeming to forget her presence at the New-Square/Oval-Office schmooze that secured pardons for the four Hasidic felons who set up a phony school in Brooklyn to swindle the government out of millions intended for the poor.

RESURRECTING RUFF

KnowNothing noted that her"best memory" was that she never spoke to her brother or to Mr. Cunningham about the pardons. With variations of "I don't have a memory" and "my best memory, and avoiding the more obvious "I don't recall" and "my best recollection," KnowNothing reprised the Ruffian standard used during the clinton years to commit perjury without penalty.

I GET LETTERS

...or more precisely, envelopes. During her denials of involvement in any of the pardons, KnowNothing made the curious claim: "People handed me envelopes, I passed them on [and never opened a single one. Honest.]"

I AM VICTIM

Reprising the role of victim that enabled her to win a senate seat in spite of record-high personal negatives and public failures, the senator peppered her answers about big, bad Hugh (understanding that the subtext was big, bad Bill) with "saddened" and "disappointed" and "heartbroken" and "shocked."

UTTER CONTEMPT FOR THE PEOPLE

This session today was cut short by a staffer when reporters appeared dissatisfied by Senator KnowNothing's lack of candor.

In the end, this press conference full of poses, poll-tested phrases and prevarication was just another display of the clintons' utter contempt for the people. Bill Clinton committed the same error last Sunday in his shameless, lie-filled New York Times Pardongate Apologia.

The clintons' fundamental error: They are too arrogant and dim-witted to understand that the demagogic process in this fiberoptic age isn't about counting spun heads; it's about not discounting circumambient brains.

 
 

 
Don't lose
Your head
To gain a minute
You need your head
Your brains are in it.
--an old roadside ad, Pushme-Pullyou
 
 
 
 
HIM: "I didn't have sex with that pardon."

HER: Sen. KnowNothing Victim Clinton Effectively Pleads 5TH by Invoking Spousal Privilege

Connect the dots, Helen...

HEY, HEY MARY JO!
Can you spell R-I-C-O?


19 posted on 10/15/2001 12:18:20 PM PDT by Mia T
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Mia T
Hmm...I think this post is HTML/CSS terrorism. Plain text on plain white backgrounds, minimal graphics, and sticking to ONE point only--these are the marks of communications greatness.
20 posted on 10/15/2001 12:18:20 PM PDT by HoweverComma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson