Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Montana: Medical Marijuana Approved
The Billings Gazette ^ | November 3, 2004 | Allison Farrell

Posted on 11/03/2004 1:51:01 PM PST by Wolfie

Medical Marijuana Approved

Helena -- Montanans suffering from certain medical conditions may be able to legally smoke marijuana to ease their symptoms come January 1. The Medical Marijuana Act passed by a 63 to 37 percent margin Tuesday with 375 of 881 precincts reporting. The new act will protect patients, their doctors and their caregivers from state and local arrest and prosecution for the medical use of marijuana.

Teresa Michalski of Helena couldn't be happier. Michalski once lived in fear that her late son, Travis, would spend the last few months of his short life in jail for using marijuana during the last stages of Hodgkin's disease.

"I knew the people in Montana were compassionate and I could count on them," said Michalski, a fifth-generation Montanan.

U.S. Deputy Drug Czar Scott Burns, however, warned Montanans that federal law trumps state law, and said during a recent visit to Montana that no state initiative permitting the medical use of marijuana can circumvent the federal law prohibiting the possession and use of the drug.

"There's no safe harbor," Burns said.

But Paul Befumo, treasurer of the Marijuana Policy Project of Montana, said he's "elated" that the measure passed.

"People don't have to worry about being criminalized any more," he said.

Proponents say smoking marijuana relieves nausea, increases appetite, reduces muscle spasms, relieves chronic pain and reduces pressure in the eyes. It can be used to treat the symptoms of AIDS, cancer, multiple sclerosis and glaucoma, among other diseases, they say.

Medical marijuana has been approved by voters in Alaska, California, Colorado, Maine, Nevada, Oregon and Washington. In Hawaii, a law was passed by the Legislature and signed by the governor in 2000. In Vermont, a law was passed by the Legislature and allowed to become law without the governor's signature in May 2004, the Marijuana Policy Project reports.

The Montana measure's campaign was financially backed by the national Marijuana Policy Project out of Washington, D.C.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; US: Montana
KEYWORDS: drugwar; giveitupwolfie; wodlist
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

1 posted on 11/03/2004 1:51:01 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

This is a conservative issue, too. Notice the red states that have approved med-pot by 60 percent margins. Please, W... don't ask me to arrest cancer patients.


2 posted on 11/03/2004 1:54:02 PM PST by Lexington Green (The REAL Texas State Motto = Be Friendly Or We'll Kill You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

"U.S. Deputy Drug Czar Scott Burns, however, warned Montanans that federal law trumps state law, and said during a recent visit to Montana that no state initiative permitting the medical use of marijuana can circumvent the federal law prohibiting the possession and use of the drug. "



Hey Scott - how many illegals crossed the Mexican border while you were making your threats?


3 posted on 11/03/2004 1:59:48 PM PST by Blzbba (Conservative Republican - Less gov't, less spending, less intrusion.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green

I've been hearing conservative radio talking about this as a conservative issue, but I'm having a hard time swallowing it. Perhaps I just need to learn more about the position..

And I like that motto.


4 posted on 11/03/2004 2:00:12 PM PST by SBOinTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Blzbba

Burns can stick his warning up his overgrown federal butt!


5 posted on 11/03/2004 2:01:42 PM PST by claudiustg (Go Sharon! Go Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Good one for me home state. Some of the things listed as medical conditions that would qualify one (ie cancer) are often fatal. If someon's dying I say give them whatever the hell they want, including pot.


6 posted on 11/03/2004 2:03:20 PM PST by Ignatius J Reilly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBOinTX
I've been hearing conservative radio talking about this as a conservative issue, but I'm having a hard time swallowing it. Perhaps I just need to learn more about the position..

Read some of Clarence Thomas' writings on the Substanial Effects doctrine.

7 posted on 11/03/2004 2:03:52 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Lexington Green
"Please, W... don't ask me to arrest cancer patients."

Oh my. He's not going to ask you to arrest cancer patients. Don't be silly. He is, however, going to ask the DEA to continue to arrest anyone who violates federal law.

99% of "patients" who smoke marijuana for medical reasons were already smoking marijuana before they even saw a doctor for their condition. (Little known statistic.)

8 posted on 11/03/2004 2:05:09 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tacticalogic

Wow thank you


9 posted on 11/03/2004 2:05:34 PM PST by SBOinTX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SBOinTX

I see it as a States' Rights issues. So did the Prez the first time he ran.


10 posted on 11/03/2004 2:05:55 PM PST by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie

Big Sky Country suddenly looks even more...spacious!

Like Wow, man - that sky is SO blue...;^)


11 posted on 11/03/2004 2:10:36 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SBOinTX
"I've been hearing conservative radio talking about this as a conservative issue,"

It is a conservative issue in the sense that conservatives are against it.

Liberals, Libertarians, and anarchists are in favor.

12 posted on 11/03/2004 2:10:56 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
(Little known statistic.)

It must have hurt like hell when you pulled it out of your *ss!

13 posted on 11/03/2004 2:12:41 PM PST by headsonpikes (Spirit of '76 bttt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Wolfie
I don't want medical marijuana. Its silly. This is not about medical marijuana, its about legalizing marijuana.

Medical marijuana advocates are just using this issue as a blind for making marijuana legal. OK, I can deal with that, lets just make it legal and be done with it.

Its not worth keeping it illegal. Lets just be done with it.

Former warrior in the WOD.

14 posted on 11/03/2004 2:15:22 PM PST by Dogrobber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BigSkyFreeper


Hey buddy...
where are you?


15 posted on 11/03/2004 2:16:50 PM PST by onyx (John "F" Kerry deserves to be the final casualty of the Vietnam War - Re-elect Bush/Cheney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
Liberals, Libertarians, and anarchists are in favor.

So, let me get this straight. According to you, if a person doesn't believe marijuana should be illegal, no matter that person's stand on ALL other conservative issues, then that person is NOT a conservative?

16 posted on 11/03/2004 2:18:04 PM PST by houeto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: onyx
Right here!

I voted against that! My thoughts on that are, if you legalize medical marijuana, eventually I think, there will be a movement to legalize marijuana to the same level as cigarettes. That's just a theory of mine. The handwriting is on the wall.

17 posted on 11/03/2004 2:19:37 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Congratulations President-Re-Elect George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: robertpaulsen
It is a conservative issue in the sense that conservatives are against it.

If what you're trying to "conserve" is the New Deal.

18 posted on 11/03/2004 2:20:57 PM PST by tacticalogic ("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ignatius J Reilly
"If someon's dying I say give them whatever the hell they want, including pot."

Yeah. I mean, they gonna die anyways.

Hmmmm. I wonder. Would it be out of line to maybe try some dangerous experimental drugs on them? You know. If they're gonna die ...

Or wait! Why can't we take, say, a healthy kidney or one lung or maybe a piece of their liver (a small piece, of course) before they die if someone else needs it right away.

I mean, they're gonna die anyways.

19 posted on 11/03/2004 2:21:10 PM PST by robertpaulsen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Dogrobber
I don't want medical marijuana. Its silly. This is not about medical marijuana, its about legalizing marijuana.

Precisely how I feel about the issue. Medical marijuana is just a euphemism for "legalizing marijuana for any purpose".

20 posted on 11/03/2004 2:22:35 PM PST by BigSkyFreeper (Congratulations President-Re-Elect George W. Bush!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-149 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson