[Steely Glint]

Well, you addicts have fun here. Try to find a valid argument somewhere, as you haven't found one yet. In fact, you're not even close to finding one. Invalid and stupid arguments that smoking isn't harmful or that the government can't regulate restaraunts and bars or that the government can't regulate smoking in public places because other things are harmful as well won't get you anywhere.

Those of you dumb enough to maintain that cigatette smoke is not a health hazard really need to start reading the literature on the subject. If you have any questions about your secondhand smoke being a health hazard, drop by any asthma-related web site.

Have a nice day, addicts. You don't get as many as non-smokers do.

[Madame Dufarge]

You don't get as many as non-smokers do.

It's a small price to pay to avoid the company of the real oxygen thieves.

[Shethink13]

Have a nice day, addicts. You don't get as many as non-smokers do.

You seem to have a reading comprehension problem. Several of us, myself included, have stated that we are NOT smokers, but agree with the private property argument.

Of course, we wouldn't want the FACTS to interfere with your ill-formed, socialist opinions, would we?

[Just another Joe]

The person here that has not advanced a valid argument yet is yourself.

You won't provide any substantiation on any of your statements except that smoking may cause harm to human beings (We already knew that) and that restaurants are subject to some regulation.

We, OTOH, have provided much substantiation on the effects of ETS, including links to govt agencies, peer reviewed scientific studies, and many others.

Don't run away mad, just run away.

[Just another Joe]

Have a nice day, addicts. You don't get as many as non-smokers do.

BITE ME YOU SANCTIMONIOUS SOB!