Posted on 09/27/2005 10:05:14 AM PDT by NYer
Moscow, September 24, Interfax - Cardinal Lubomyr Husar, head of the Ukrainian Greek Catholics, following President Viktor Yuschenko, has spoken in favour of establishing a one Church in Ukraine.
According to the cardinal, all the church problems would be solved, if Ukraine had one patriarch for all. This is the basis on which both the Orthodox and Catholics could return to the primary unity, he believes as cited by the Religious Information Service in Ukraine this week.
At the same time, he adds, there are no claims that a Greek Catholic should be the patriarch; what is only important is that this patriarch should be a person capable of uniting all.
However, Husar lays down the condition that this Church and this patriarch should be united with Rome. It seems to mean that if the patriarch is not initially Uniate, he will have to join the Unia afterwards.
The Ukrainian Greek Catholic Church, its leader affirms, continues the historical policy of the Kiev Metropolia, but as the cardinals present designation of supreme archbishop is little known in the tradition of Eastern Churches, an ordinary Christian does not know what to do with it. In Husars view, the UGCC has long grown up to act as patriarchate, for it is a natural development for a Local Church in the Eastern tradition.
At the same time the cardinal is concerned about the failure of the Latin theology to appreciate any sharing between Local Churches and Rome. The Vatican, he believes, understood unity as subjection and this process was called Uniatism.
Denouncing Uniatism today, Husar points out, he seeks a vision of unity which should be built not on uniformity, but on the preservation of everyones own tradition in the form of sharing. This is a rather complicated problem and, to the cardinals regret, not quite adequately solved. The Ukrainian Greek Catholics, however, intend to move towards its solution and to be in the vanguard, though not everyone in Rome has been made to change his mind.
The Supreme Archbishop underscores that in the matter of one Church much hangs on relations with the Orthodox, referring to both the Ukrainian Orthodox Church linked with the Moscow Patriarchate and the unrecognized Ukrainian Autocephalous Church.
He believes however that among the Orthodox the spiritual processes develop in a very much disordered way - a reason for which we all are in a rather chaotic state, from which we should come out step by step.
Husar says he would welcome the emergence of three patriarchs in Kiev at once, Russian Orthodox, Greek Catholic and Autocephalous, because they would make three partners in negotiations, and this would make a concrete talk much easier and help to come to the idea of one patriarch and one patriarchate much sooner.
According to the cardinal, neither Moscow nor Rome will give us our unity. It has to be developed independently. And then Rome, Constantinople or Moscow, which is much younger compared to them, will just accept this fact. He sees it more desirable to consider this issue in a discussion in which various confessions and the government could participate, since the Ukrainian president has stated on many occasions that the government would like to see a one Local Church.
In order to influence those Ukrainians who are not disposed to such a dialogue today, the cardinal proposes to use the existing examples of certain decisions. He cites Northern Ireland, where people are struggling for a life in harmony. His also cited relations between the Palestinian and the Israeli as a similar example.
In Husars opinion, the negotiations on unification should be started by people with higher education and solid religious training. In doing so, they should understand that the aim of the negotiations is already clear: the Church should be one, and we all recognize it, so the unification is not a matter of our good will. It is the commandment that is in point.


Orthodox ping!
Kinda goes without saying.
A prayer "that they may all be one..."
thanks for posting....this would truly be monumental!
I wondered when this fellow would get around to something like this. My prediction is that both Rome and Orthodoxy in general will write him off as a loose, and dangerous, cannon.
One point, though. It seems to me that the article itself is confusing in that it says that the ultimate "Patriarch" in this scheme will have to be in communion with Rome and thus a Uniate. From what is quoted, it looks like a Uniate is exactly what this man is saying the "Patriarch" will not be.
Extremely confusing. When someone demystifies it, please send me a ping.
As I read it, he says this union must be developed independently. IOW, once agreement is reached, it would be generally accepted. Who better to understand such a working model than those who live it, right? (or am I misunderstanding something else here)
ping
ping
More Garbage attempts to unite with Rome and water down Orthodoxy. UNACCEPTABLE.
Sorry, I don't follow. This Cardinal is head of a Uniate church in communion with the Successor of Peter. Why is he condemning his own church?
Lol .... classic
Husar wants his Uniatism without subjection. Uniate in a new way, shall we say.
That's the same (or similar) drift I've gotten from other reading on potential Catholic-Orthodox reunion.
"More Garbage attempts to unite with Rome and water down Orthodoxy. UNACCEPTABLE"
That's exactly what it is, Tex!
"Why is he condemning his own church?"
A) Rome has thusfar refused to designate him a "Patriarch".
B) Uniatism is falling apart in the land of its birth.
C) Both of the above
You pick!
Wow....we do agree on some things I suppose...:)
Maybe he has found a BETTER one.....
The One, Holy and ORIGINAL Orthodox Church!
Accept NO substitutes.
Yeah, I was kind of surprised myself! :)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.